2501 réponses à ce sujet

[NErWOnek]

I think that Shepard did take care of the lunar AI going rogue, it's probably something else

[Darker_than_black]

Michel1986 wrote...

Is overlord the same VI as used in mass effect 1 on luna (earth's moon) ?

I highly doubt that. This VI is some sort of fuse between a human and geth technology. Besides, Shepard took out the VI on Luna, so why would it be back?

Modifié par Darker_than_black, 23 mai 2010 - 10:27 .

[gazz]

cant wait for this to become available ive downloaded every other add on '  a hope the more add ons 2 come

[Mister Mida]

Szabo-Krajnyak Sandor wrote...

It's more than 2 weeks before the release. What do you think, any chance we get Alternate Appearance Pack 2 before it?

Did they announce a release date then? They've said it's coming in June, but not when in June.

Modifié par Mister Mida, 23 mai 2010 - 07:46 .

[Mister Mida]

Szabo-Krajnyak Sandor wrote...

Mister Mida wrote...

Szabo-Krajnyak Sandor wrote...

It's more than 2 weeks before the release. What do you think, any chance we get Alternate Appearance Pack 2 before it?

Did they announce a release date then? They've said it's coming in June, but not when in June.

No they did not yet. I just don't think we'll get it on 1st June. Maybe the week next.
BTW, did you notice it, that we get every DLC on a tuesday?

Yeah, I did. Bioware sure loves his tuesdays. And I got the feeling we probably get it only somewhere late in June. After the 20th or something.

[Mister Mida]

Szabo-Krajnyak Sandor wrote...

Mister Mida wrote...

Szabo-Krajnyak Sandor wrote...

Mister Mida wrote...

Szabo-Krajnyak Sandor wrote...

It's more than 2 weeks before the release. What do you think, any chance we get Alternate Appearance Pack 2 before it?

Did they announce a release date then? They've said it's coming in June, but not when in June.

No they did not yet. I just don't think we'll get it on 1st June. Maybe the week next.
BTW, did you notice it, that we get every DLC on a tuesday?

Yeah, I did. Bioware sure loves his tuesdays. And I got the feeling we probably get it only somewhere late in June. After the 20th or something.

I really hope you're wrong. Or that we'll get a small pack before it. Then it's ok

Well, we'll find out eventually.

[HCS01]

Sound interesting enough... one thing I am personally hoping for is additional N7 armor pieces that aren't helmets. Customization options are very limited with just the standard arm, leg and chest pieces.

[StodgyFrost98]

Cloaking_Thane wrote...

sounds ok, but another $7 bucker is

May in the dlc we can possibly bring Legion along and have some interesting dialogue options.  Just a theory.

[StodgyFrost98]

StodgyFrost98 wrote...

Cloaking_Thane wrote...

sounds ok, but another $7 bucker is

May in the dlc we can possibly bring Legion along and have some interesting dialogue options.  Just a theory.  Hopefully the next dlc will be one of the dlcs that bridge the gap between ME2 and ME3. 

[MarchWaltz]

NErWOnek wrote...

I think that Shepard did take care of the lunar AI going rogue, it's probably something else

After you kill the lunar AI, it sends out a binary.

It translates to HELP.

Doubt this DLC has anythign to do with that though...would be nice.

[SteveGentry]

Well, I hope it starts to gear us up for the final installment in this fine trilogy...I pray that Bio is still listening to we consumers....please don't ruin one of the most imaginative IPs in over 15 years by putting out crappy little DLCs that add nothing to the depth you've created already..your quality standards are a reason I love your work...don't ****** it away at our expense...PLEASE! Otherwise..carry on, folks!

[pra_viilon]

Rive Caedo wrote...

I actually see where Pra is coming from though. If they were to include anything *significant* to the plots established in ME2, anyone who doesn't buy DLC and only buys retail copies of things is going to be left out completely.
Zaeed and Kasumi aren't a problem (and neither is Overlord presumably) because their plotlines are self-contained. Firewalker isn't a problem because it's self-contained and isn't much of a plotline anyway, hehe.

fully agree. DLC shouldn't add something too significant. its like an extra fun.

[Brako Shepard]

Yeah major story situations should be left to either the original game, or future expansion discs which will allow offline gamers to still be involved for the next sequal.

[PARAGON87]

StodgyFrost98 wrote...

Cloaking_Thane wrote...

sounds ok, but another $7 bucker is

May in the dlc we can possibly bring Legion along and have some interesting dialogue options.  Just a theory.  Hopefully the next dlc will be one of the dlcs that bridge the gap between ME2 and ME3. 

I doubt it.  In each DLC we had, there was a severe lack of squadmate voiceovers, I think in Firewalker a squadmate said something when the complex within the volcano was about to explode, also when you completed an objective but that's it. 

I hope I'm proven wrong. :innocent:

[Torrential]

Rive Caedo wrote...

I actually see where Pra is coming from though. If they were to include anything *significant* to the plots established in ME2, anyone who doesn't buy DLC and only buys retail copies of things is going to be left out completely.
Zaeed and Kasumi aren't a problem (and neither is Overlord presumably) because their plotlines are self-contained.

How is it any different with Zaeed and Kasumi if they are going to be in ME3? Assuming you are correct, and they are not going to be in ME3 however:

You're not telling me its difficult to write a self contained plot for any character are you? I could give you several dozen off the top of my head.

Firewalker isn't a problem because it's self-contained and isn't much of a plotline anyway, hehe.

Your tone indicates you think that is a good thing or at least a satisfactory DLC? If so we have massively different expectations from a proven company like Bioware.

pra_viilon wrote...

fully agree. DLC shouldn't add something too significant. its like an extra fun.

What we find fun is vastly different then, and the reason I disagree strongly with you. I enjoy content that adds depth or interesting stories, not pointless fluff.

Modifié par Torrential, 24 mai 2010 - 12:39 .

[nikki191]

im looking forward to this DLC.. but sigh.. fixing up Cerberus screw up that potentially can cause the deaths of millions.. again haha

[FuturePasTimeCE]

nikki191 wrote...

im looking forward to this DLC.. but sigh.. fixing up Cerberus screw up that potentially can cause the deaths of millions.. again haha

can't wait. get to play with Kasumi in more new missions as a awesome squad mate (great additives w. the DLC).

[Maestro975]

NErWOnek wrote...

I think that Shepard did take care of the lunar AI going rogue, it's probably something else

It is. The Lunar VI was called Hannibal. If you're hostile to EDI (picking "AIs are dangerous"), then Miranda attempts to smooth things over, telling EDI that Shepard's mistrust of AIs stems from the incident "the Hannibal program" on Luna. Once you befriend EDI, then she tells you that Hannibal was an attempt to create a controllable AI.

IMHO, I think this was what Keiji found out. That the Alliance, not Cerberus, was doing illegal research on Luna, they deliberately sabotaged Hannibal in an attempt to make it sentient.

So, yeah, Overlord is definitely something different.

[RinpocheSchnozberry]

This is out today, right guys?  Because today is June.

June.  So it's out today.

Guys?

Guys?

:mellow: