Aller au contenu

Photo

Reaper Intelligence and Morality


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
283 réponses à ce sujet

#201
Khayness

Khayness
  • Members
  • 6 852 messages

cruc1al wrote...

Anyone feel like there's going to be some sort of alliance between humans and reapers that don't agree with Harbringer? Sort of reaper rebels? Like the alliance between humans and cylon rebels in BSG?


Let's wait how Retribution will play out. Though I have to admit it would be pretty anti-climatic.

@KnightofPhoenix: Hear, hear!

#202
cruc1al

cruc1al
  • Members
  • 2 570 messages

annihilator27 wrote...

cruc1al wrote...

Anyone feel like there's going to be some sort of alliance between humans and reapers that don't agree with Harbringer? Sort of reaper rebels? Like the alliance between humans and cylon rebels in BSG?


That would be interesting, Reapers fighting amongst themselves.


But I must agree with Icinix, it would be a disappointingly lame cliche. It almost reeks of a deus ex solution. "Hey suddenly there's a civil war between them, just when they were about to destroy us".

#203
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

cruc1al wrote...

annihilator27 wrote...

cruc1al wrote...

Anyone feel like there's going to be some sort of alliance between humans and reapers that don't agree with Harbringer? Sort of reaper rebels? Like the alliance between humans and cylon rebels in BSG?


That would be interesting, Reapers fighting amongst themselves.


But I must agree with Icinix, it would be a disappointingly lame cliche. It almost reeks of a deus ex solution. "Hey suddenly there's a civil war between them, just when they were about to destroy us".


I agree. "Humanising" the Reapers would make them bland. I can understand doing that with the darkspawn (Awakening) because they were quite bland in Origins. But the Reapers do not require this for them to be interesting. Keep them as this huge monolithic threat, each a nation and yet completely united.  

#204
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...


Remember the context when the term was created. It was an excuse for the British to start terror bombing campaigns on the German people, because they were held responsable for their government. Same logic applied to the atomic bombing of Japan. Stalin definately used that logic to allow his troops to rape their way to Berlin.
Same logic is applied to "collective punishment".
 
Collective guilt may exist. But to use it to justify collective punishment and mass murder (which is what it was historically used for) may be a quite dangerous belief.


I agree with you, and that´s one of the reason why it makes me sick that we Germans are STILL held responsible for the N@zi´s crimes though about 99% of the population were children or not yet born in 1945.

But, on the other hand, it is naive to say only Hitler / Stalin / other tyrants are the bad guys. They could not have done anything without other people working for them.

#205
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

cruc1al wrote...

Anyone feel like there's going to be some sort of alliance between humans and reapers that don't agree with Harbringer? Sort of reaper rebels? Like the alliance between humans and cylon rebels in BSG?



So far there is nothing pointing to that. And I have to say, I am quite glad about that.

I mean, even if some reapers disagree with Harbinger I would expect them to wait with their civil war until they´re done with their human / asari / turian / etc / ... enemies.

#206
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

Tirigon wrote...
But, on the other hand, it is naive to say only Hitler / Stalin / other tyrants are the bad guys. They could not have done anything without other people working for them.


Of course. But when you say an entire nation is guilty, the only logical conclusion to this is collective punishment (because the guilty need to be punished). And that logic creates more problems than it solves.

Afterall, N@zi ideology was based on the same logic. All of Jewry was to be held responsable for the acts of some Jewish Bolsheviks (and there is no doubt there were many of them).
 
So I would be careful when applying "collective guilt" to entire nations. Because if that's the case, every single people on Earth has a dark past to be guilty of and punished for.

#207
Costin_Razvan

Costin_Razvan
  • Members
  • 7 010 messages

All of Jewry was to be held responsable for the acts of some Jewish Bolsheviks (and there is no doubt there were many of them).




Oh? Do tell what those Jewish Bolsheviks did. Never knew this.



Tigiron: Following your logic then every German should be sentenced to death.

#208
cruc1al

cruc1al
  • Members
  • 2 570 messages

Tirigon wrote...

cruc1al wrote...

Anyone feel like there's going to be some sort of alliance between humans and reapers that don't agree with Harbringer? Sort of reaper rebels? Like the alliance between humans and cylon rebels in BSG?



So far there is nothing pointing to that. And I have to say, I am quite glad about that.

I mean, even if some reapers disagree with Harbinger I would expect them to wait with their civil war until they´re done with their human / asari / turian / etc / ... enemies.


But the reaping of advanced civilizations would be exactly what ignited the civil war. Some reapers would come to the conclusion that the cycle must end.

#209
Khayness

Khayness
  • Members
  • 6 852 messages

Oh? Do tell what those Jewish Bolsheviks did. Never knew this.


Well they've estabilished a nice cozy soviet republic over here in Hungary. It was short lived, but they wreak havoc so badly it given base for the antisemitism here in the upcoming decades.

#210
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

Costin_Razvan wrote...


All of Jewry was to be held responsable for the acts of some Jewish Bolsheviks (and there is no doubt there were many of them).


Oh? Do tell what those Jewish Bolsheviks did. Never knew this.


What I meant is a lot of Jews (or so called Jews, depends on how you define being "Jewish") were heavily involved in the communist revolution and the subsequent Bolshevik government. So the Jewish Bolshevik conspiracy, while mostly false, was not made up of thin air.

#211
sami jo

sami jo
  • Members
  • 2 248 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Costin_Razvan wrote...


All of Jewry was to be held responsable for the acts of some Jewish Bolsheviks (and there is no doubt there were many of them).


Oh? Do tell what those Jewish Bolsheviks did. Never knew this.


What I meant is a lot of Jews (or so called Jews, depends on how you define being "Jewish") were heavily involved in the communist revolution and the subsequent Bolshevik government. So the Jewish Bolshevik conspiracy, while mostly false, was not made up of thin air.


Antisemitism in Europe and Russia dates back long before communism all the way to the pre-Christian Roman Empire.  That was a large part of what drove some Jews to join the Bolsheviks.  And communism sounded like a grand idea in theory, particularly if you were among the oppressed.  All kinds of people who had been oppressed under the Czars joined the communist revolution.  Most of them, including Jews, faired worse under the new regime. 

KoP's right, if you punish an entire people for the crimes of a few, or even of many in their ranks is a very slippery slope.  That's the sort of argument terrorists use to justify the slaughter of innocents. 

#212
William Adama

William Adama
  • Members
  • 194 messages
A common misconception that I feel needs addressing; the term Jewish technically did not arise until AFTER the establishment of Christianity. Historically speaking, pre-Christian theists whom followed the Septuagint (Greek translated Hebrew testament) and the Old Testament were called Hebrew.



Both Christianity and Judaism are a branch of the religion Hebrew (as is Islam). What differentiates Hebrew from Judaism is the Mishanh (oral torah) which allowed Old testament followers to decentralize their faith in response to the destruction of the Temple at Jerusalem by the Romans.




#213
William Adama

William Adama
  • Members
  • 194 messages

William Adama wrote...

A common misconception that I feel needs addressing; the Jewish religion technically did not arise until AFTER the establishment of Christianity. Historically speaking, pre-Christian theists whom followed the Septuagint (Greek translated Hebrew testament) and the Old Testament were called Hebrew.

Both Christianity and Judaism are a branch of the religion Hebrew (as is Islam). What differentiates Hebrew from Judaism is the Mishanh (oral torah) which allowed Old testament followers to decentralize their faith in response to the destruction of the Temple at Jerusalem by the Romans.



#214
SuperMedbh

SuperMedbh
  • Members
  • 918 messages
Nifty thread.  I wonder how many of you have read Childhood's End by Clarke?  It's a great book, so I won't spoil it if you haven't.  (Synopsis here)  If you've read it, do you see any parallels between the Overmind and the Reapers?  And for that matter, the Overlords and the Collectors?  The big difference is that Clarke presents mankind's metamorphosis as something inevitable, and even desirable in the grand scheme of things.  But in Mass Effect, we have the human race saying "No acension for me, thank you very much".  I doubt that the Reapers think of themselves as evil, per se.  They're just helping the evolution of the species along (or at least the human species).

#215
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

Costin_Razvan wrote...

Tigiron: Following your logic then every German should be sentenced to death.


Of course not. As said, the individual people are not responsible, and most of those who were adults in 1945 are already dead anyways.

However, I think it was a mistake to recreate the German state as quickly as 1949. It would have been better to occupy Germany for longer, and Germany shouldn´t be allowed to have an army. Would not only be a justified consequence of the N@zi rule but also have the advantage that we Germans wouldn´t have to serve in the armyB).

It was quite some trouble to get my T5 (that means I´m considered to be unable to become soldier and thus don´t have to waste 9 months in the army!)

#216
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

SuperMedbh wrote...

But in Mass Effect, we have the human race saying "No acension for me, thank you very much".  I doubt that the Reapers think of themselves as evil, per se.  They're just helping the evolution of the species along (or at least the human species).


If the reapers were just helpers, they would accept if a race disagrees to "evolve" and not wipe them out.

#217
Wildecker

Wildecker
  • Members
  • 428 messages

SuperMedbh wrote...

Nifty thread.  I wonder how many of you have read Childhood's End by Clarke?  It's a great book, so I won't spoil it if you haven't.  (Synopsis here)  If you've read it, do you see any parallels between the Overmind and the Reapers?  And for that matter, the Overlords and the Collectors?  The big difference is that Clarke presents mankind's metamorphosis as something inevitable, and even desirable in the grand scheme of things.  But in Mass Effect, we have the human race saying "No acension for me, thank you very much".  I doubt that the Reapers think of themselves as evil, per se.  They're just helping the evolution of the species along (or at least the human species).


Sovereign's little speech on Virmire did not sound like "We mean you no harm. It's for your best, really."
"You exist because we permit it, and you will perish because we demand it"? That's not your Galactic Social Streetworker.

#218
cruc1al

cruc1al
  • Members
  • 2 570 messages

Tirigon wrote...

SuperMedbh wrote...

But in Mass Effect, we have the human race saying "No acension for me, thank you very much".  I doubt that the Reapers think of themselves as evil, per se.  They're just helping the evolution of the species along (or at least the human species).


If the reapers were just helpers, they would accept if a race disagrees to "evolve" and not wipe them out.


Unless they think the disagreeing races don't know what they want/need.

#219
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

cruc1al wrote...

Tirigon wrote...

If the reapers were just helpers, they would accept if a race disagrees to "evolve" and not wipe them out.


Unless they think the disagreeing races don't know what they want/need.


It is a foolish assumption anyone could know what´s best for you unless yourself. If they think what they do is "helping others to their luck" that means they´re asses and I´ll enjoy kicking their butts in ME3:police:

#220
Guest_Adriano87_*

Guest_Adriano87_*
  • Guests

Tirigon wrote...

Costin_Razvan wrote...

Tigiron: Following your logic then every German should be sentenced to death.


Of course not. As said, the individual people are not responsible, and most of those who were adults in 1945 are already dead anyways.

However, I think it was a mistake to recreate the German state as quickly as 1949. It would have been better to occupy Germany for longer, and Germany shouldn´t be allowed to have an army. Would not only be a justified consequence of the N@zi rule but also have the advantage that we Germans wouldn´t have to serve in the armyB).

It was quite some trouble to get my T5 (that means I´m considered to be unable to become soldier and thus don´t have to waste 9 months in the army!)


you're lucky so far, the serving in the army takes 24 months in our country! but I'm going to be Exempt. yes, the murderers has died and punishing old men and woman has no use in bringing back the innocents who had been killed by them. in trying to expand our view about the penalty of death, I agree with execution in future cases.

ah the Reapers! they want to slash the advanced races of the galaxy. prepare to die! :huh:

#221
Wildecker

Wildecker
  • Members
  • 428 messages

Tirigon wrote...

Costin_Razvan wrote...

Tigiron: Following your logic then every German should be sentenced to death.


Of course not. As said, the individual people are not responsible, and most of those who were adults in 1945 are already dead anyways.

However, I think it was a mistake to recreate the German state as quickly as 1949. It would have been better to occupy Germany for longer, and Germany shouldn´t be allowed to have an army. Would not only be a justified consequence of the N@zi rule but also have the advantage that we Germans wouldn´t have to serve in the armyB).

Ah ... maybe you wouldn't know, but the British Army of the Rhine, the Red Army and the U.S. Army stayed until the early nineties. And they had special jurisdiction - German police had no authority inside their barracks.  So occupation didn't just end in 1949.
The West German army was re-created in 1955, with the East German Army more or less in the same timeframe. My father volunteered to get away from the small village he was born and raised, and his unit shared barracks with the British.

Tirigon wrote...

It was quite some trouble to get my T5 (that means I´m considered to be unable to become soldier and thus don´t have to waste 9 months in the army!)

Warmduscher. Zu meiner Zeit waren das noch 15 Monate bzw. 456 Tage "und der Rest von heute ..."

#222
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

Wildecker wrote...

Ah ... maybe you wouldn't know, but the British Army of the Rhine, the Red Army and the U.S. Army stayed until the early nineties. And they had special jurisdiction - German police had no authority inside their barracks.  So occupation didn't just end in 1949.
The West German army was re-created in 1955, with the East German Army more or less in the same timeframe. My father volunteered to get away from the small village he was born and raised, and his unit shared barracks with the British.


I know that quite well, my grandfather was one of the first recruits, but he was one of those who protested against reintroduction of the Wehrpflicht.

Occupation ended in 1949 when the BRD was founded. Of course, other countries still had units here (The USA still have soldiers and nukes in Germany today, maybe others too) but they were no longer an occupying force but allies.


Tirigon wrote...

It was quite some trouble to get my T5 (that means I´m considered to be unable to become soldier and thus don´t have to waste 9 months in the army!)

Warmduscher. Zu meiner Zeit waren das noch 15 Monate bzw. 456 Tage "und der Rest von heute ..."

Linke faule Zecke FTW!:P:P:P:P:P:P (meint mich btw)

#223
KitsuneRommel

KitsuneRommel
  • Members
  • 753 messages

Adriano87 wrote...

you're lucky so far, the serving in the army takes 24 months in our country! but I'm going to be Exempt. yes, the murderers has died and punishing old men and woman has no use in bringing back the innocents who had been killed by them. in trying to expand our view about the penalty of death, I agree with execution in future cases.


Actually we could expand that to the victors too. http://en.wikipedia....ng_World_War_II

#224
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

KitsuneRommel wrote...


Actually we could expand that to the victors too. http://en.wikipedia....ng_World_War_II


I do not think the allied war crimes excuse the N@zi´s crimes. Even more so as the allies´crimes happened later.

#225
Shepard needs a Vacation

Shepard needs a Vacation
  • Members
  • 612 messages
basically what your trying to say here,is that there might be a few Reapers who feel pity and may want to stop the harvest this time?