Sajuro wrote...
Again, the Alliance only said they went rogue after Cerberus was found out by Shepard. They are basically like the Third Echelon of Mass Effect that the Alliance will disavow any and all knowledge of their operations if they are asked but ultimately it is still the Alliance directing them from high up
Funny how you support this but deny Cerberus efficiency. If the Alliance thought Cerberus was inept, they'd just shut them down. But as far as the "screw ups" go, Cerberus is still around and in the first line of defence.
They are tasked with pushing the limit, which involves regular screw ups. It's practically planned. Yet, all the benefits go to the Alliance, and are never spoken off as Cerberus accopmlishements. The screw ups, BTW, are also not made common knowledge. You have to be at least an Eclipse merc captain to even know about Cerberus existence, and in that case you fear them so much as to order immediate pesonnel evacuation and stockpiles destruction when you believe there is a Cerberus ship in orbit.
Also most screw ups come from defection of the individuals Cerberus employs. It's the dowside of the high reward aims, known as high risk. [Heavy risk, but the priiize!] The more resourceful the induvidual is the more prone he/she is to greed, or pride, or simple insubordination, which all may lead to defection. And TIM must always have a contingency plan and strict security protocol in effect.
The only Cerberus failures are the loss of Gillian Grayson and the "Kahoku cell". The latter depends on whether YOU chose to do those missions or not. Even if you did them, most probably the cell was already being in the dismantling stage at the time, because it had been compromised.
Cerberus may not be a part of the Alliance government on paper, but it's a part of the Alliance political system. RAND Corp, Boeing and Halliburton aren't parts of the US government, but today US is unimaginable without them. Who says some other political body (which is formed by corporate capital, instead of social contract, BTW) in the future can't "outsource" some intelligence and questionable research activities?
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 17 mai 2010 - 06:48 .