It's obvious he doesn't like letting Shepard make his/her own decisions. He always manipulates everyone.Sajuro wrote...
I think it is dumb that he felt the need to lie to Shepard about the Collector ship trap since he knew Shepard understood the nessecity of stopping the collectors. That incident is one of the reasons my Shep decided to blow up the station since he knew that Timmy didn't have a problem lying to him and that **** wasn't going to fly. He might have a failsafe (he probably does) in case Shepard becomes too much of a problem, maybe he had Wilson install the control chip behind Miranda's back.
Cerberus is a surprisingly inept organization
#776
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 07:46
#777
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 07:57
#778
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 08:00
Guest_Shandepared_*
#779
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 09:53
Okay, your logic is convincing. Fact is that he doesn't seem to be in controll of much at all considering all the security problems at every project Cerberus does. Well except those mysterious unknown projects that might have been sucessfull of course. Informing Shepard about those sucessfull projects would probably make Shepard more loyal by the way. Yet somehow all we hear about is projects ending in husks and boom.Sajuro wrote...
but that still doesn't necessitate lying to Shepard since that is the only chance they have at finding out where the collectors live. He also falls short of manipulative bastard since he showed Shepard he was willing to lie in order to get what he wants instead of letting Shepard feel like he's in charge while prodding Shep in the desired direction.
#780
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 09:56
The difference is that Cerberus doesn't give you any reasons to risk your life except: "We lie and manipulate all the time but it's for a vague greater good so just trust what we say and not what we do wich often is failing".Shandepared wrote... You risk your life in every mission anyway, so what is the difference?
#781
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 09:58
Guest_Shandepared_*
lovgreno wrote...
The difference is that Cerberus doesn't give you any reasons to risk your life except: "We lie and manipulate all the time but it's for a vague greater good so just trust what we say and not what we do wich often is failing".Shandepared wrote... You risk your life in every mission anyway, so what is the difference?
Since when is it vague? Stop the Collectors or humanity goes the way of the dodo. TIM gave you a reason for going into the Collector ship and that reason was true. He just didn't give you the full story.
#782
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:13
Timmy hopes that history will vindicate him, hasn't he heard?
Propaganda is written by the victor, History is written by the observer.
#783
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:16
#784
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:17
And the observer is only in a position to write at the sufferance of the victor.captainapollo wrote...
You have to be amazed at the sheer audacity of the illusive man to manipulate shepard, it seems to be the only thing within cerberus that goes well. if only he took a great of an interest into the rest of his organisation.
Timmy hopes that history will vindicate him, hasn't he heard?
Propaganda is written by the victor, History is written by the observer.
#785
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:17
What I don't understand is why he thinks we wouldn't of done these things with the "full story."Shandepared wrote...
He just didn't give you the full story.
I think he's more concerned about making sure it's done his way.
#786
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:18
Guest_Shandepared_*
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Who was blind enough not to see the trap coming in the first place? It screamed 'set up' from the get go, and even TIM pre-mission warned that there could be survivors repairing the ship or calling for reinforcements.
Honestly I didn't think too much about it my first time through. I was mostly just enjoying the ride.
#787
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:19
Guest_Shandepared_*
Massadonious1 wrote...
What I don't understand is why he thinks we wouldn't of done these things with the "full story."
It's not that he doesn't think you would play along, it's that he fears if he lets on that he (and you) know that it is a trap that the Collectors will be tipped off somehow. He's already fooled the Collectors once so he is probably assuming that they won't let him fool them again (at least not as "easily").
#788
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:22
He wasn't concerned you wouldn't do it, he was concerned that you, or someone on your team, would have accidentally warned the collectors of the trap before you had taken the bait that you needed to.Massadonious1 wrote...
What I don't understand is why he thinks we wouldn't of done these things with the "full story."Shandepared wrote...
He just didn't give you the full story.
I think he's more concerned about making sure it's done his way.
TIM has only once, once, tried to overrule Shepard to get his own way, and that was for something as critical and future-shaping as the Collector Base.
#789
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:25
#790
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:27
Guest_Shandepared_*
Vaenier wrote...
Trap or not, the disabled collector ship was another failed part of the plot. Why didnt they blast away at it more with the Normandy to make sure it was disabled? Why did they go in with such a small force? Why did they act so surprised there were enemies on an enemy controlled vessel?
I think it would have worked better if the story TIM told you about the Collector ship was true. Maybe add a timed component in there. I also like the ideas I've heard elsewhere about the Collector ship being a mini-suicide mission, perhaps one in which one of your squadmates can die.
#791
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:30
Modifié par Massadonious1, 03 juin 2010 - 10:30 .
#792
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:32
Shandepared wrote...
lovgreno wrote...
The difference is that Cerberus doesn't give you any reasons to risk your life except: "We lie and manipulate all the time but it's for a vague greater good so just trust what we say and not what we do wich often is failing".Shandepared wrote... You risk your life in every mission anyway, so what is the difference?
Since when is it vague? Stop the Collectors or humanity goes the way of the dodo. TIM gave you a reason for going into the Collector ship and that reason was true. He just didn't give you the full story.
Collectors didn't poses even slightest threath for humanity in general, they targeted ONLY Terminus colonies confidentially staing away from any colonies within Council controlled space... question is WHY and from who they have info that it's perfectly safe to attack Freedoms Progrees or Horizon without fear of military retalitations from Council and the Alliance?
No TiM have only one goal... get inside of Collector base AT ALL COSTS and trust me... not to save humanity.
TiM known that he doesn't poses necessary "assets" to assure overtaking of that station using his own forces so he started long term project involving Shepard.
He give us team of people which possible death in C-Base won't have too big impact on general status of the galaxy affairs but befroe that he made everything what was possible to SEPARATE Sheard from the Council, Alliance and at least one of the old team mates (Virmire survivor).
By the way too bad that Bioware doesn't have guts to show us TiM's reaction on fact that Shepard was reinstated as Council Spectre what was after all against his plans...
And for the bolded part... no you are wrong, hiding even smallest information which can made difference between literaly life and death disqualifed TiM as relayable source of information and completely shattered even smallest spark of trust (if my Shep would ever trust TiM's intention in first place ).
Too bad that Bioware didn't give us a real choice to break whole "cooperation" whit TiM at this moment...
And i think this whole case sumarized pretty good Shep reply to Jacob's unconditional faith in TiM.
"If he try once again such thing, Collectors will be last thing he would be worried".
#793
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:33
Guest_Shandepared_*
Massadonious1 wrote...
How exactly would one of us "tip off" the Collectors?
"In any number of ways." Take your pic.
#794
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:37
Guest_Shandepared_*
Asheer_Khan wrote...
Collectors didn't poses even slightest threath for humanity in general, they targeted ONLY Terminus colonies confidentially staing away from any colonies within Council controlled space...
If it weren't for the blood rage your idiocy spawns in me I think I'd find your posts entertaining. Of-course the Collectors pose a threat. The vanishing of hundreds of thousands or perhaps millions of people to build a functioning Reaper is a serious problem. In the meantime it weakens humanity's influence by stripping us of colonies and secondly it provides the Reapers with another powerful tool with which to enact their plans within the galaxy.
Asheer_Khan wrote...
(...)trust me... not to save humanity.
Oh I do, I really do.
#795
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:42
Shandepared wrote...
Asheer_Khan wrote...
Collectors didn't poses even slightest threath for humanity in general, they targeted ONLY Terminus colonies confidentially staing away from any colonies within Council controlled space...
If it weren't for the blood rage your idiocy spawns in me I think I'd find your posts entertaining. Of-course the Collectors pose a threat. The vanishing of hundreds of thousands or perhaps millions of people to build a functioning Reaper is a serious problem. In the meantime it weakens humanity's influence by stripping us of colonies and secondly it provides the Reapers with another powerful tool with which to enact their plans within the galaxy.Asheer_Khan wrote...
(...)trust me... not to save humanity.
Oh I do, I really do.
Jerk.
#796
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:55
He never gives the full story, not even close. Just enough to make people do the next task he have for them. What is he hiding? Something good or something bad?Shandepared wrote...
lovgreno wrote...
The difference is that Cerberus doesn't give you any reasons to risk your life except: "We lie and manipulate all the time but it's for a vague greater good so just trust what we say and not what we do wich often is failing".Shandepared wrote... You risk your life in every mission anyway, so what is the difference?
Since when is it vague? Stop the Collectors or humanity goes the way of the dodo. TIM gave you a reason for going into the Collector ship and that reason was true. He just didn't give you the full story.
#797
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:56
Guest_Shandepared_*
lovgreno wrote...
He never gives the full story, not even close. Just enough to make people do the next task he have for them. What is he hiding? Something good or something bad?
You're complaining that he only gives you enough information to complete the task at hand?
Why exactly?
#798
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:56
lovgreno wrote...
What is he hiding? Something good or something bad?
He's not the top dog in the food chain and the Alliance really still has pull over Cerberus to various degrees.
#799
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 10:58
#800
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 03 juin 2010 - 11:06
Guest_Shandepared_*
Massadonious1 wrote...
Eh, I don't see it. The entire point of that mission was to gather data, and we encountered resistance regardless.
...and you got the data. However if the Collectors had been aware that they were being played for fools again they might have sprung their trap much earlier, forcing you to flee without having the chance to scan their ship's computer.





Retour en haut




