Is the secret of Kasumi's greybox Dr. Shu Qian's research on Sovereign?
#1
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 07:06
It seems rather clear to me that Kasumi's loyalty mission is a nod to the events of the first novel.
#2
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 07:09
#3
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 07:10
But basically what the above poster says is pretty much what I think too...
Modifié par DirtyVagrant, 15 mai 2010 - 07:11 .
#4
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 07:12
This make the most sense to me.kraidy1117 wrote...
I think it would be alot more interesting if the graybox proves that Cerberus never did split and only high rannking officials know the truth.
#5
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 07:16
DirtyVagrant wrote...
But Saren informed the Council of what the Sidon base was researching (AI) and the Council and Goyle had their little argument about it. They didn't really treat it as intergalactic war threatening either, they just threatened sanctions against the Alliance. Even if they were to say it was Reapers... they'd probably just dismiss it as nonsense or something...
But basically what the above poster says is pretty much what I think too...
But was the existense of Sovereign and the Alliance's prior knowledge and research of it ever divulged to the Council? I don't recall that, as Saren seemed pretty intent on keeping it under wraps so he could use it for his own ends.
I'd think revealing that the Alliance had known of and studied the ancient sentient warship decades before it went on to attack the Citadel and almost annihilated all life in the galaxy and chose not to divulge that information to be pretty damaging.
In any case, why would the greybox contain images of Sovereign if it's secret was only that Cerberus never actually went rogue?
Modifié par JKoopman, 15 mai 2010 - 07:19 .
#6
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 07:20
JKoopman wrote...
DirtyVagrant wrote...
But Saren informed the Council of what the Sidon base was researching (AI) and the Council and Goyle had their little argument about it. They didn't really treat it as intergalactic war threatening either, they just threatened sanctions against the Alliance. Even if they were to say it was Reapers... they'd probably just dismiss it as nonsense or something...
But basically what the above poster says is pretty much what I think too...
But was the existense of Sovereign and the Alliance's prior knowledge and research of it ever divulged to the Council? I don't recall that, as Saren seemed pretty intent on keeping it under wraps so he could use it for his own ends.
I'd think revealing that the Alliance had known of and studied the ancient sentient warship decades before it went on to attack the Citadel and almost annihilated all life in the galaxy and chose not to divulge that information to be pretty damaging.
In any case, why would the greybox contain images of Sovereign if it's secret was only that Cerberus never actually went rogue?
Um what? Did you play the same game as me? No one knows what is in there, and the best idea and a great twist would be that Cerberus never did split.
#7
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 07:21
Modifié par DirtyVagrant, 15 mai 2010 - 07:29 .
#8
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 07:57
kraidy1117 wrote...
JKoopman wrote...
DirtyVagrant wrote...
But Saren informed the Council of what the Sidon base was researching (AI) and the Council and Goyle had their little argument about it. They didn't really treat it as intergalactic war threatening either, they just threatened sanctions against the Alliance. Even if they were to say it was Reapers... they'd probably just dismiss it as nonsense or something...
But basically what the above poster says is pretty much what I think too...
But was the existense of Sovereign and the Alliance's prior knowledge and research of it ever divulged to the Council? I don't recall that, as Saren seemed pretty intent on keeping it under wraps so he could use it for his own ends.
I'd think revealing that the Alliance had known of and studied the ancient sentient warship decades before it went on to attack the Citadel and almost annihilated all life in the galaxy and chose not to divulge that information to be pretty damaging.
In any case, why would the greybox contain images of Sovereign if it's secret was only that Cerberus never actually went rogue?
Um what? Did you play the same game as me? No one knows what is in there, and the best idea and a great twist would be that Cerberus never did split.
Read the first post. When Kasumi accesses the greybox at the end of her loyalty mission the very first window that pops up in the long chain of windows displays a clear image of Sovereign.
#9
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 08:00
Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 15 mai 2010 - 08:01 .
#10
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 08:01
JKoopman wrote...
kraidy1117 wrote...
JKoopman wrote...
DirtyVagrant wrote...
But Saren informed the Council of what the Sidon base was researching (AI) and the Council and Goyle had their little argument about it. They didn't really treat it as intergalactic war threatening either, they just threatened sanctions against the Alliance. Even if they were to say it was Reapers... they'd probably just dismiss it as nonsense or something...
But basically what the above poster says is pretty much what I think too...
But was the existense of Sovereign and the Alliance's prior knowledge and research of it ever divulged to the Council? I don't recall that, as Saren seemed pretty intent on keeping it under wraps so he could use it for his own ends.
I'd think revealing that the Alliance had known of and studied the ancient sentient warship decades before it went on to attack the Citadel and almost annihilated all life in the galaxy and chose not to divulge that information to be pretty damaging.
In any case, why would the greybox contain images of Sovereign if it's secret was only that Cerberus never actually went rogue?
Um what? Did you play the same game as me? No one knows what is in there, and the best idea and a great twist would be that Cerberus never did split.
Read the first post. When Kasumi accesses the greybox at the end of her loyalty mission the very first window that pops up in the long chain of windows displays a clear image of Sovereign.
I highly doubt that, al that was showen was Kasumis lover, unless you can get me a screanshot that shows me (and not photoshoped) then I will beleive you.
#11
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 08:11
One of the harder decisions to make, especially because you can't be entirely sure what data it contains. Do you want to cover up for the Alliance (and possibly Cerberus) if they did something bad? Will you keep it so you might have an ace up your sleeve against Hackett? Or risk someone else using it against the Alliance, effectively undoing all your hard work?
And then there's the personal side of the problem: Do you want to keep Kasumi living in the past or help her move on?
I played it safe and had her destroy it.
Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 15 mai 2010 - 08:16 .
#12
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 08:13
#13
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 08:44

So it IS a Reaper, but not Sovereign. Which begs the question: what the **** is this thing? A captured second Reaper (ignoring the derelict one)? Sovereign remade?
#14
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 08:51
#15
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 08:55
Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 15 mai 2010 - 08:59 .
#16
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 08:56
T'would be an interesting twist, however [insert Shyamalan pic here].
Modifié par Nivenus, 15 mai 2010 - 08:56 .
#17
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 09:33
This decision is getting harder and harder, I think I might metagame this one after having played Mass 3.
Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 15 mai 2010 - 09:37 .
#18
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 09:58
#19
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 10:01
#20
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 10:08
#21
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 10:37
Hmmm...Kaiser Shepard wrote...
So it IS a Reaper, but not Sovereign. Which begs the question: what the **** is this thing? A captured second Reaper (ignoring the derelict one)? Sovereign remade?
A Reaper shown in Kasumi's graybox, who is NOT Sovereign, so it is a completely different Reaper(most likely not the derelict one)which we, as of yet, have no knowledge of.
And this data could heavily incriminate the Alliance of...something...
Uh oh.
#22
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 10:49
Nivenus wrote...
It does indeed look a lot like a Reaper, though not Sovereign. However, I don't think Sovereign actually shows up as such in Revelation IIRC. He's too big to hide on a planet. Rather, I thought it was just a Reaper artifact that led Saren to Sovereign.
Well, there still is the Leviathan of Dis, which I always assumed to be Sovereign considering it disappearing in 2163 and the first book, Revelation, where Saren got across information about Sovereign taking place in 2165. The timeline shows that Edan Had'dah from Revelation, which I haven't read yet, discovered "a mysterious artifact orbiting an unnamed planet near the Perseus Veil" in 2162, though. We know his artifact turned out to be Sovereign, but that also means 'Dis' isn't Sovereign. Could the fabled Leviathan have been salvaged by the Alliance?
BellatrixLugosi wrote...
Hmm I like this topic. Kaiser if you see any other interesting pics regarding that greybox let us know.
Here's the one I mentioned earlier, you should know it, but it's to have some reference material:
Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 15 mai 2010 - 12:04 .
#23
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 11:03
#24
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 11:12
#25
Posté 15 mai 2010 - 12:39
The Leviathan of Dis was also said to be the skeleton a biological space ship. Reaper materials still come up as synthetic material after whatever processing is done to them.





Retour en haut






