Sorry it took so long to get back to you, I got addicted to Alpha Protocol for a bit.
Zulu_DFA wrote...
And this does not make any sense at all. As I said, if Miranda believed Wilson was a traitor, there was no element of surprise. Instead of shhoting him in the face, she could hav shot him in the knee caps, or tear his hands of with biotics, or incapacitate him in any numver of ways. At that point wilson had no chance. He knew it the moment he saw Miranda, because being a smart guy, afterall, he correctly pinned her down as source of the mech attach.
The Hard Evidence; think things through, if you were Wilson you wouldn't give a flying **** about Miranda when you're looking at Jacob and Shephard (i.e., Miranda is no where to be seen, or you could be giving it an idle thought, but she isn't exactly your priority). As Hard Evidence, he thinks at the moment that she was 'dropped by mechs over at D wing... which doesn't make much sense really since Jacob and Shephard apparently just came from there, but that is irrelevant.
The Hard Evidence seems to be that I'm not disputing the fact that Wilson isn't a traitor, I'm merely disputing the fact that you're automatically assuming he had Shadow Broker support (Cerberus Command complicity). Wilson can be a traitor without the complicity of the Shadow Broker (Cerberus Command complicity - copy and paste is fun!), and the Hard Evidence for that is like yours, supposition (which isn't Hard Evidence at all!). Hard Evidence doesn't fit into this sentence well either, but it makes even less sense for The Illusive Man to set up the mass killings on the Lazarus Cell for the simple fact that it doesn't really fit into his modus operandi; TIM doesn't set out to kill people (through his scientific endeavours)... people may grow on trees (figuratively speaking of course... imagine the amount of humans in the Mass Effect universe, trillions? tens of trillions?) but not necessarily scientists who are willing to work for Cerberus.
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Jacob got suspicious of Wilson for a moment, but Wilson managed to quell this, and for the good reason: he was not the one who masterminded the mayham. The only thing he forgot to mention, was that he was a traitor indded. His plan was to wait until Shepard is complete (another couple of days), then give the "package" away to the Shadow Broker, while it would have beed in transit. So when Jacob said on the radio, that Shepard is alive, Wilson decided to stick to the plan - put Shepard on a shuttle and rendevoux with the Shadow Broker's agents. He could have hoped to get Jacob from behind by surprise, or simply relied on a squad of the Blue Suns armed to the teeth that would accompany the Shadow Brokers agent (Cerberus complicity).
To me, the Hard Evidence was only that Wilson expressed shock that Shephard was still alive. Also to consider for Hard Evidence is that if Shephard awoke considerably earlier than projected, it could of affected Wilson's schedule (whatever it is). To be honest, I don't think you're plan
isn't likely, I just eyebrow raised at your notion that it's automatically cut-n-dried (no Hard Evidence in that sentence, oh wait!).
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Inflicting a wound on youself in the circumstances when a very confined place is crawling with hostile machinery is just to prove you're a good guy is a bit implausible. More likely you'll shoot yourself in the head out of dispair.
I can't really make Hard Evidence fit into this sentence but here you go; it isn't implausible, it is however ill-advised. The 'Hard Evidence' (at least, how you'd define it) is when Wilson says: "I was shot how can you explain that" (or words to that effect) when as you say; Jacob questions why he even has access to the security mech system. I would suggest the Hard Evidence being is that you don't exactly know when Wilson 'fried the system' meaning that he had plenty of time to look up their locations, or perhaps they were 'off' before Wilson turned them 'on' to bust through the door (you never actually read the computer system, and that's the Hard Evidence! - you're just taking him at his 'word.') Hard Evidence? It sure is convenient that the Loki's only come through the opposite door when Wilson gets his medi-gel fix! Also speaking from the whole 'Hard Evidence' angle, providing that the Shadow Broker was only interested in Shephard in regards to selling him/her to the Collectors, it wouldn't matter what state that the Commander arrives.
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Wilson may be a greedy and lusty SOB, and even a bit crazy (in the mad scientist sense), but he was no fool. Killing Shepard with a risk to his own healh could not be his goal.
Lets just say that the Hard Evidence of what I said was that you're confusing my intent when I said kill and incapacitate. I'll spell it out this time. Kill Jacob (useless), Incapacitate Shephard (useful). Hard Evidence suggests that there is plenty of ways to incapacitate someone, even Shephard, and Wilson can do all of this without Shadow Broker's involvement/support (and Cerberus Command complicity).
Zulu_DFA wrote...So, unless you come up with a better explanation (preferably with "hard evidence" in every sentnence [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/wink.png[/smilie]) for what happened on the Lazarus station, the case remains closed and archived.
For what it's worth, did I successfully use 'Hard Evidence' in every sentence? Personally I believe these things:
a) Wilson is definitely a traitor.

Wilson is involved with the Shadow Broker.
c) Cerberus Command isn't complicit (Byzantine way of 'cleaning up the project' and outing any rogue agents seems like a waste of resources... Cerberus needs 'secret police' for their 'secret status')
d) Miranda's 'field test' comment was a figure of speech considering that's exactly what it turned out to be, not necessarily their initial intent.