Aradace wrote...
I can personally count on one hand the amount of game-to-movie translations that didnt just flat out suck. That doesnt mean they were good, it just means that they didnt suck as bas as say Double Dragon or Super Mario Brothers. Even Prince of Persia sucked. I know people are "hoping" the Mass Effect movie doesnt blow but let's face facts here, the liklihood of it NOT being bad is VERY slim at best. I'll probably end up watching it just out of principle to say I watched it. But I have absolutely no expectations nor delusions that it's going to be good even in the slightest 
The crappy video game to movies you mentioned (Super Mario Bros and Double Dragon) were terrible for a variety of reasons: the first is that they had no business being made. Super Mario Bros was changed from a light-hearted, fun kids' game of running and jumping into a movie about two brothers transported to a dystopian future and battling an evil dictator. Talk about changing the basics.
And thats why it failed...because the studio execs and writers apparently thought they could improve on the property by changing it almost completely...and then they wonder why it was viewed as a failure.
And Double Dragon is a pure beat 'em up...a guy's girl gets kidnapped and he goes after the kidnappers, kicking ass all the way...how do you add anything new or worthwhile to such a cliched, worn out, shallow story?
Mainly, the point was neither of those movies really had a story to tell...Mass Effect does. It fact, it has many stories to tell.
In thinking all video game based movies suck, you're making a blanket statement which is mostly true, but not entirely. You're also overlooking the fact that Bioware will be heavily involved in this movie, from the writing, storyboards, general direction, and hell, probably even the casting, meaning they'll hopefully bring the level of quality we're used to in their games to the first movie based on those games.
Therefore, it can be reasonably assumed the studio and director will probably listen to Bioware's input regarding all those issues. Granted, Bioware is a gaming company, not a movie studio, so there's that. But, Bioware knows how to tell a damn good, compelling story with fully-fleshed out and believable characters. Combining those talents with a studio (Legendary Pictures) who have a decent record of adaptations to film: Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, Watchmen, and 300 are all pretty good examples--that isn't to say all were great films, but each had merit and was fully backed by the studio to get the job done right.
Watchmen is a perfect example of my point. Legendary didn't think twice about the fact that one of the main characters of the film was a naked blue God who's naughty bits would be visible a fair portion of the time he was on screen. Most studios would've forced the character into pants or a speedo, but Legendary didn't. While thats a shallow example, it does show Legendary is willing to bow to the wishes of the filmmakers to make a better product, even in something as eye-brow raising as a blue penis in a superhero deconstructionist movie.
Hence, I think that with a studio like Legendary allowing a modicum of freedom for the writers, director(s), and actors, combined with bringing in the architects of the universe from Bioware to work in conjunction with them will result in a much better movie than most of us cynics expect. I have faith in both Bioware and Legendary Pictures, so at this point there's no reason to be a pessimist, despite history's lessons.
Why do people overlook key factors when working out logic? It defeats the purpose.
BigBody26 wrote...
I have seen a bunch of people mention the First Contact War and I am not reading through 160+ pages to see if anyone else has suggested this.
People have argued against the First Contact War and against following the games plot for obvious reasons. Now, they have created Mass Effect books. One, Revelations, centered around Captain Andersons mission he went on with Saren that he mentions in the first game. In that book you learn how Saren comes to learn about Sovereign and if made into a movie could be an excellent lead-in to a ME movie that does follow the video game story. We would get to see a couple of characters we are familiar with while also seeing a different story that sheds light on events leading up to the first video game. Could work.
It could work, sure, but it'd be boring. Its not the main show (the main show being the introduction of the Reapers/Sovereign and their plan to wipe out all intelligent life in ME). Thats the big seller. Thats the milkshake that brings all the boys to the yard.
Revelations is a nice lead-in to that, but on its own there's not much exciting or incredible or new that Revelations brought to the table. It was a good read, but it'd probably be a very disappointing movie, especially to fans of Mass Effect who already have certain expectations pertaining to the game itself.
The novels are at best interquel adventures, tiding us over between game releases until the big, main adventures comes out in the games. Why would you want to see a movie that doesn't focus on the big bad enemy, or the ultimate threat, with the best, most compelling story?
Modifié par DIrishB, 15 septembre 2010 - 09:49 .