6700 réponses à ce sujet

[MyCatSaid]

I've been wanting to say my part for awhile on this.

I think it will be great if they follow Shepards story also if they make a different one hope it's as good as Shepards, needs to be as gripping as the games storyline and good characters. Interesting to who they will choose to the play the cast.

Really excited for this and ME3. Can't wait for both!

[Maestro975]

So in conclusion, a war being fought between random Krogan warlords and a bunch of hired corporate mercenaries has gone on longer and involved more deaths than the ENTIRE First Contact War.  How could anyone think that the FCW would make a good setting for ANY major project?  

Let's face the facts:

1. Adapting the plot of the first game would be too much for newcomers to digest. We had the codexes in the game. The movie wouldn't have those. There's a reason why Chris Nolan did Batman Begins before he did The Dark Knight.

2. With the exception of the asari and quarians, aliens are going to be some pretty big CGI work. Lifelike turians would be particularly hard, if the texture issues in ME1 are any indication, and getting the turian look wrong would anger anyone who is even slightly optimistic about the film, and would be the final insult to anyone who isn't. So they might need to be handled a bit more conservatively than they are in the VGs. If humans are fighting helmeted turians, that wouldn't require as much work.

3. Given the attempts to make this a multi-media franchise ala Star Trek, taking a route similiar to what they've done with the Resident Evil films would be counterproductive. TPTB probably would, at the very least, want it to concievably fit in with Revelation, Ascension, et.al. Why go through all the trouble of introducing so many elements not touched upon in the VGs if they didn't?

4. A story that takes place almost entirely on the Citadel, Illium, Omega, Bekenstein, or Elysium might not be enough for a VG, but it's plenty for a movie, though that kindof play into your suggestion for Garvug instead.

So, the ideal course would be to start out with the discovery of the Prothean ruins and Mass Relay, and Jon Grissom's epic first flight. We would then flash forward 9 years, chronicling the Relay 314 incident, and also setting up the rivalry between the Alliance and the batarians, which could be a plot point in sequels. Grissom is a very important character in the ME mythos, but doesn't figure into either game (he dies during or shortly after ME2). As he is a difficult man to like, a more likeable lead would be needed to play off of him, but in many ways, Grissom is the anti-Shepard. A hero who couldn't live up to the reputation and grew to hate it. After the FCW ended, he resigned his commission and refused all interviews. Perhaps he endured something "that can break you, if you let it." A sequel could then follow this younger, more likeable lead as he (or she) joins C-Sec, giving us a more detailed look at the Citadel (Harkin was one of the first humans to join, but not the first), or the Blue Suns, where he meets Vido and Zaeed as young men, and has a crisis of conscience when Vido stages his little coup, or Cerberus, joining it for reasons similar to why Jacob or Rupert did, but growing dissilusioned by their harsh methods. Either way, he could fight a krogan warlord (who is being funded by batarians) and befriend a young quarian on his/her pilgrimage.  


I'll admit, I like your idea of a movie devoted to Eclipse fighting Clan Hailot on Garvug, and perhaps letting us decide who the real bad guy is (as opposed to Avatar's "natives good, soldiers bad" attitude); as does the but not as a first movie. Plus, it takes place during the events of ME2 (dissappointed a DLC mission didn't come out of it, imagine a mission where you're dropped right into the middle of a battlefield where Eclipse and vorcha are shooting at each other, then you get caught right in the middle, perfect Paragon/Renegade dilemma in there, too). I personally think that another CDN storyline, where technophobic terrorists murder the son of a prominent businessman, and he hires Eclipse to wipe them out, would also make for an interesting movie (the moral price of revenge, timely "war on terror" parallel, etc), but likewise, the fact that it takes place during ME2 could be problematic. It would probably be better to set a movie during those 30 years before Shepard became a Spectre, lots of fertile ground there. 

In terms of casting, I'd suggest Bruce Greenwood as Jon Grissom, and Steve Buscemi as one of the salarian voices (doubt that would happen, though).

[mattylee10]

Given that some folks have mentioned the new batman movies and in particular Batman begins as ways of letting new fans into the series by showing the early development of the lead character, maybe this movie should take a similar route by focusing on Shepards backstory.

Before everyone starts shouting - yes i know there are multiple histories for shep so the most cinematic one would have to be picked, the war hero one would probably be easiest for the average cinema goer to digest - shep as the big military hero sets things up for the future story. You could include flashbacks to his/her earlier life, reasons for signing up and training. May be a little Starship troopers-esque but the original book was pretty good so thats not necessarily a bad thing.

[Omega-202]

Maestro975 wrote...
blah blah blah...
I'll admit, I like your idea of a movie devoted to Eclipse fighting Clan Hailot on Garvug,

You completely misunderstood what I said.  Completely and totally.

The LAST thing I'd want to see is something that insipid.  Garvug would not make a good movie.  The First Contact War would not make a good movie.  

THE GAMES, Mass Effect 1 and Mass Effect 2, would make great movies.  

My comparison was only to illustrate how absolutely stupid the idea of a FCW movie would be by comparing it to an absolutely worthless "war".  If the galaxy as a whole doesn't seem to care about an entire city worth of Krogan and Vorcha getting demolished due to corporate orbital strikes, then why would 600 human deaths and 1200 turian deaths even make the front page news?  

The movie will be based on the game.  That's it.  End of story.  Its the only part of the established universe that could support a movie and really draw in an audience with the idea of a large scale threat.  Everything else is like starting Star Wars with Luke's childhood as a moisture farmer.  

There's no other human-centric story in the ME storyline that could carry a movie.  It needs to be a Shepard/ME 1 movie.  

Modifié par Omega-202, 21 novembre 2010 - 07:26 .

[Maestro975]

Omega-202 wrote...

various anti FCW stuff

Someone doesn't like Year One stories. Given the success of Batman Begins, Casino Royale, and Jeff Abrams' Star Trek, I guess there's no accounting for taste on your part.

The movie will be based on the game.  That's it.  End of story.  Its the only part of the established universe that could support a movie and really draw in an audience with the idea of a large scale threat.  Everything else is like starting Star Wars with Luke's childhood as a moisture farmer.  

No, it would be like starting Star Wars with KOTOR, which was everything the prequels should have been.

There's no other human-centric story in the ME storyline that could carry a movie.  It needs to be a Shepard/ME 1 movie.  

Not too familiar with the Skyllian Blitz, or the events of the novels.

Or if you are... "they gave them eyes but they cannot see."


There are thousands of story opportunities that do not involve Shepard. Anyone who can't see this is a shortsighted fool. I suppose it's because Shep's the player-controlled character and everyone wants to see their Shepard represented on the screen? If so, then perhaps we're all quite a vain, egotistical lot. Half the crowd is offended at the prospect of seeing a Shepard that is "not my Shepard," the other half are offended by the prospect of a story that is independent of Shepard's story (a'la the novels).

Games have Shepard, books have Kahlee Sanders, a third protagonist for the films is the smartest course. For those of you that would consider that cowardly, "cowards tend to survive." The non-VG crowd don't really have a clue on who Shepard and Sanders are anyway. 


"Don't think this time period is more important just because you're in it." Jolee Bindo, KOTOR.

We are only a small fraction of the crowd a film would need to attract.

[SPARTANMST]

Omega-202 wrote...

Maestro975 wrote...
blah blah blah...
I'll admit, I like your idea of a movie devoted to Eclipse fighting Clan Hailot on Garvug,

You completely misunderstood what I said.  Completely and totally.

The LAST thing I'd want to see is something that insipid.  Garvug would not make a good movie.  The First Contact War would not make a good movie.  

THE GAMES, Mass Effect 1 and Mass Effect 2, would make great movies.  

My comparison was only to illustrate how absolutely stupid the idea of a FCW movie would be by comparing it to an absolutely worthless "war".  If the galaxy as a whole doesn't seem to care about an entire city worth of Krogan and Vorcha getting demolished due to corporate orbital strikes, then why would 600 human deaths and 1200 turian deaths even make the front page news?  

The movie will be based on the game.  That's it.  End of story.  Its the only part of the established universe that could support a movie and really draw in an audience with the idea of a large scale threat.  Everything else is like starting Star Wars with Luke's childhood as a moisture farmer.  

There's no other human-centric story in the ME storyline that could carry a movie.  It needs to be a Shepard/ME 1 movie.  

I agree with you, I don't see what everyone's problem is with a movie based on Shep's story, sure some decisions may not be the same, and he may romance someone different than the people we chose, but does that really matter THAT much?

[Maestro975]

SPARTANMST wrote...

Omega-202 wrote...

Maestro975 wrote...
blah blah blah...
I'll admit, I like your idea of a movie devoted to Eclipse fighting Clan Hailot on Garvug,

You completely misunderstood what I said.  Completely and totally.

The LAST thing I'd want to see is something that insipid.  Garvug would not make a good movie.  The First Contact War would not make a good movie.  

THE GAMES, Mass Effect 1 and Mass Effect 2, would make great movies.  

My comparison was only to illustrate how absolutely stupid the idea of a FCW movie would be by comparing it to an absolutely worthless "war".  If the galaxy as a whole doesn't seem to care about an entire city worth of Krogan and Vorcha getting demolished due to corporate orbital strikes, then why would 600 human deaths and 1200 turian deaths even make the front page news?  

The movie will be based on the game.  That's it.  End of story.  Its the only part of the established universe that could support a movie and really draw in an audience with the idea of a large scale threat.  Everything else is like starting Star Wars with Luke's childhood as a moisture farmer.  

There's no other human-centric story in the ME storyline that could carry a movie.  It needs to be a Shepard/ME 1 movie.  

I agree with you, I don't see what everyone's problem is with a movie based on Shep's story, sure some decisions may not be the same, and he may romance someone different than the people we chose, but does that really matter THAT much?

Technically no, but at least half the people here are still foaming at the mouth about it. With so many of them pissed that there even IS a movie in the works, the movie is going to bring something new to the table in order to justify its existence. So many are naively hoping that their playthrough will be represented on the big screen, others are violently angry because they fear that their playthrough will be invalidated somehow. A new story in the same universe, with a different lead, solves all these problems.

Modifié par Maestro975, 21 novembre 2010 - 09:22 .

[Alienmorph]

SPARTANMST wrote...

I agree with you, I don't see what everyone's problem is with a movie based on Shep's story, sure some decisions may not be the same, and he may romance someone different than the people we chose, but does that really matter THAT much?

Perfectly agree. How make a movie based on ONE possibility would ruin our respective playtrought? Yes, I would be a bit sad to have a Shepard who romances Williams and Miranda instead of Liara and Tali, but that would be ONE possible story, it doesn't annhilate what we can do in the games. So... let's follow decently the main story and the characters characterization and I'd be happy anyway.

[Omega-202]

Maestro975 wrote...


Someone doesn't like Year One stories. Given the success of Batman Begins, Casino Royale, and Jeff Abrams' Star Trek, I guess there's no accounting for taste on your part. 

I love origin stories...but what you fail to connect between all of those examples is that those are ESTABLISHED IP's and reboots.  Who those characters are later is something that the audience goes in having a vague idea about.  They know how important Bruce, Bond and the Enterprise end up being.  

They didn't start Dr. No with Bond's origin.  They didn't start ST: tOS with Star Fleet academy.  Detective Comics # 27 didn't start with Bruce's origins and the 1989 Batman film barely touched on his origins besides his parent's murder.  

Characters don't get a "Year One" until there's a reboot or its a very established IP. 

Seeing the beginnings of humanity's entrance into the galactic scene ends up being very anticlimactic if it ends with humanity looking like a spoiled ignorant child, especially if you don't know how important a human ends up being for the survival of all sentient life.  

No, it would be like starting Star Wars with KOTOR, which was everything the prequels should have been.
 

What the prequels should have been is irrelevant.  The "prequel" story to ME is set up and established in canon and its just as disappointing as the content from the SW prequels.  There's a bunch of small wars that end up looking insignificant compared to what comes later.  There's no existential threat, only a bunch of species playing jerks and bullies.  

Not too familiar with the Skyllian Blitz, or the events of the novels.

Or if you are... "they gave them eyes but they cannot see."

Read them all and I know the Codexes better than anyone.  The Blitz lasted HOURS.  The majority of casualties for the pirate bands came from Alliance Naval vessels simply swatting Batarian vessels out of the sky.  True, it was a tough fight on the ground, but it was only one hard push and thanks to Shepard/whoever would be in his place if he wasn't the War Hero, the garrison held out.  

There wasn't a story there.  There was no prior warning.  There was very little in terms of events during the Blitz.  There was little afterward except for the eventual Torfan raids.  It was like Pearl Harbor, except the Alliance ended up not only holding out, but destroying most of the enemy ships.  

And we all know how bad a movie about Pearl Harbor can be...(see: Michael Bay)

There are thousands of story opportunities that do not involve Shepard. Anyone who can't see this is a shortsighted fool. I suppose it's because Shep's the player-controlled character and everyone wants to see their Shepard represented on the screen? If so, then perhaps we're all quite a vain, egotistical lot. Half the crowd is offended at the prospect of seeing a Shepard that is "not my Shepard," the other half are offended by the prospect of a story that is independent of Shepard's story (a'la the novels).

Games have Shepard, books have Kahlee Sanders, a third protagonist for the films is the smartest course. For those of you that would consider that cowardly, "cowards tend to survive." The non-VG crowd don't really have a clue on who Shepard and Sanders are anyway. 


"Don't think this time period is more important just because you're in it." Jolee Bindo, KOTOR.

We are only a small fraction of the crowd a film would need to attract.

Strawman much?  
Name some more instances where you could make such a story.  Please do.  The Blitz was a few hours long and was mostly a "bunker down, organize a bunch of civilians and wait for the sky cavalry" story.  Sounds real interesting.  We've gone into how crappy a FCW movie would be MANY times already in this thread.  Want to talk about the Torfan debacle or a survival horror movie about Akuze?  How could those even compare with the epic arc already set up by the games?  

If you wanted to do an Akuze movie, you could do so and save yourself the money spent for the ME intellectual property.   There's nothing special about a "space marines getting eaten by giant worms" movie.  

What other conflict could support something on the same massive scale as the games?  What else has the same gravitas as having THE prime example of humanity take the front stage in a fight for galactic survival?  How can fighting pirates compare?  What other story could carry a convincing romance plot?  Are you going to have a soldier fall in love with a civilian while their both hiding in a bunker during the entirety (a few hours) of the Blitz?  

Honestly, the name calling and how accusatory you got (especially being that you're pretty ignorant of the actual events and their magnitude) just reflects pretty badly for you and your "ideas".  This has nothing to do with "my" Shepard.  This has nothing to do with other people getting offended for contradicting their Shepard.  

As you said, most people have NO idea who Shepard is, so who are we worrying about offending?  They should just pick the best story available in the ME universe and go with that.  Objectively, that story is the one from the games.  Nothing else can compare in depth or magnitude.  

[Maestro975]

Omega-202 wrote...

Maestro975 wrote...


Someone doesn't like Year One stories. Given the success of Batman Begins, Casino Royale, and Jeff Abrams' Star Trek, I guess there's no accounting for taste on your part. 

I love origin stories...but what you fail to connect between all of those examples is that those are ESTABLISHED IP's and reboots.  Who those characters are later is something that the audience goes in having a vague idea about.  They know how important Bruce, Bond and the Enterprise end up being.  

They didn't start Dr. No with Bond's origin.  They didn't start ST: tOS with Star Fleet academy.  Detective Comics # 27 didn't start with Bruce's origins and the 1989 Batman film barely touched on his origins besides his parent's murder.  

Characters don't get a "Year One" until there's a reboot or its a very established IP. 

Seeing the beginnings of humanity's entrance into the galactic scene ends up being very anticlimactic if it ends with humanity looking like a spoiled ignorant child, especially if you don't know how important a human ends up being for the survival of all sentient life.  

No, it would be like starting Star Wars with KOTOR, which was everything the prequels should have been.
 

What the prequels should have been is irrelevant.  The "prequel" story to ME is set up and established in canon and its just as disappointing as the content from the SW prequels.  There's a bunch of small wars that end up looking insignificant compared to what comes later.  There's no existential threat, only a bunch of species playing jerks and bullies.  

Not too familiar with the Skyllian Blitz, or the events of the novels.

Or if you are... "they gave them eyes but they cannot see."

Read them all and I know the Codexes better than anyone.  The Blitz lasted HOURS.  The majority of casualties for the pirate bands came from Alliance Naval vessels simply swatting Batarian vessels out of the sky.  True, it was a tough fight on the ground, but it was only one hard push and thanks to Shepard/whoever would be in his place if he wasn't the War Hero, the garrison held out.  

There wasn't a story there.  There was no prior warning.  There was very little in terms of events during the Blitz.  There was little afterward except for the eventual Torfan raids.  It was like Pearl Harbor, except the Alliance ended up not only holding out, but destroying most of the enemy ships.  

And we all know how bad a movie about Pearl Harbor can be...(see: Michael Bay)

There are thousands of story opportunities that do not involve Shepard. Anyone who can't see this is a shortsighted fool. I suppose it's because Shep's the player-controlled character and everyone wants to see their Shepard represented on the screen? If so, then perhaps we're all quite a vain, egotistical lot. Half the crowd is offended at the prospect of seeing a Shepard that is "not my Shepard," the other half are offended by the prospect of a story that is independent of Shepard's story (a'la the novels).

Games have Shepard, books have Kahlee Sanders, a third protagonist for the films is the smartest course. For those of you that would consider that cowardly, "cowards tend to survive." The non-VG crowd don't really have a clue on who Shepard and Sanders are anyway. 


"Don't think this time period is more important just because you're in it." Jolee Bindo, KOTOR.

We are only a small fraction of the crowd a film would need to attract.

Strawman much?  
Name some more instances where you could make such a story.  Please do.  The Blitz was a few hours long and was mostly a "bunker down, organize a bunch of civilians and wait for the sky cavalry" story.  Sounds real interesting.  We've gone into how crappy a FCW movie would be MANY times already in this thread.  Want to talk about the Torfan debacle or a survival horror movie about Akuze?  How could those even compare with the epic arc already set up by the games?  

If you wanted to do an Akuze movie, you could do so and save yourself the money spent for the ME intellectual property.   There's nothing special about a "space marines getting eaten by giant worms" movie.  

What other conflict could support something on the same massive scale as the games?  What else has the same gravitas as having THE prime example of humanity take the front stage in a fight for galactic survival?  How can fighting pirates compare?  What other story could carry a convincing romance plot?  Are you going to have a soldier fall in love with a civilian while their both hiding in a bunker during the entirety (a few hours) of the Blitz?  

Honestly, the name calling and how accusatory you got (especially being that you're pretty ignorant of the actual events and their magnitude) just reflects pretty badly for you and your "ideas".  This has nothing to do with "my" Shepard.  This has nothing to do with other people getting offended for contradicting their Shepard.  

As you said, most people have NO idea who Shepard is, so who are we worrying about offending?  They should just pick the best story available in the ME universe and go with that. Objectively, that story is the one from the games. Nothing else can compare in depth or magnitude.  

I'm a helluva lot tamer than those angry disgruntled RPGeeks who are already threatening to boycott the movie. And no I am not one of them, as far as they're concerned, BW "sold out" by targeting people like me (someone who is NOT an RPG enthuisiast). And C-Sec and Omega do have enough intrigue to sustain a film on their own. You are the ignorant one if you can't see that. It's about characters and a rich universe, not scale. They can't overwhelm new converts with too much too soon, plus there's the issue of the money it would take to do certain elements justice. If you were as well-informed as you say you were, you would know that the Blitz is the result of years of tensions between the Alliance and the batarians. As for gravitas, scale, etc, half of that is execution. How much gravitas does Die Hard have when you're reading a 10 word description of its basic plot? Humanity taking its first step into a larger world (first flight, FCW, and beginnings of alliance/Batarian conflict) provides quite a bit of gravitas.

I didn't mention Akuze. Someone else suggested chronicling Shepard's early career. But even that would still be controversial, and Akuze would still be a set piece at best.

And Dr. No was only the first Bond movie because the order of the films was different than the order of the novels. Casino Royale was the first Bond novel. However, when EON/MGM bought the film rights in 1957, CR was not part of the package. They were going to start off the film franchise with Thunderball, but well-publicized legal troubles prevented that from happening. Anyway, CR did not detail Bond's origin in as great detail as the film version, but it did detail his transformation from rank and file MI6 agent to a more proactive hero who targets "the threat behind the threat." With Star Trek, when they did TOS, the backstory wasn't entirely thought out, as the writers didn't think it would still be around 40 years later. It wasn't until Next Generation that they really started developing the established canon it has now. Bryan Singer starting off the X-Men film series with Wolverine's origin would not have made much sense, but starting it off with Inferno or Phalanx Covenant wouldn't have worked either. You have to find that middle ground.

[Spinotech]

SPARTANMST wrote...

Omega-202 wrote...

Maestro975 wrote...
blah blah blah...
I'll admit, I like your idea of a movie devoted to Eclipse fighting Clan Hailot on Garvug,

You completely misunderstood what I said.  Completely and totally.

The LAST thing I'd want to see is something that insipid.  Garvug would not make a good movie.  The First Contact War would not make a good movie.  

THE GAMES, Mass Effect 1 and Mass Effect 2, would make great movies.  

My comparison was only to illustrate how absolutely stupid the idea of a FCW movie would be by comparing it to an absolutely worthless "war".  If the galaxy as a whole doesn't seem to care about an entire city worth of Krogan and Vorcha getting demolished due to corporate orbital strikes, then why would 600 human deaths and 1200 turian deaths even make the front page news?  

The movie will be based on the game.  That's it.  End of story.  Its the only part of the established universe that could support a movie and really draw in an audience with the idea of a large scale threat.  Everything else is like starting Star Wars with Luke's childhood as a moisture farmer.  

There's no other human-centric story in the ME storyline that could carry a movie.  It needs to be a Shepard/ME 1 movie.  

I agree with you, I don't see what everyone's problem is with a movie based on Shep's story, sure some decisions may not be the same, and he may romance someone different than the people we chose, but does that really matter THAT much?

While, I am a supporter of the FCW, it also baffles me how some people would be upset so terribly by their decisions not being represented in a film version of ME.  Of course then again all of my Shepard's are unique and I have less of a personal connection to what decisions I have Shepard make. 

As for what Omega-202 said about ME1 and ME2 making great movies, I hope you are right, I really do.  I am just pessimistic that's all.

[MOELANDER]

In my opinion, it would be best to use this as an expansion of the universe, not as a retelling of the plot from the first game. There don't need to be reapers in it for it to be Mass Effect. SOme sidestory with perhaps a few known faces would be nice. But since Shepard is such a player-created character, any movie represantation is bound to disappoint some fans.

[AudioCGlive]

Honestly, while I would love to see some of the novels represented in film, I need to see Paragon Shepard and Co. (Seth Green included) in a trilogy.

To those who say it cannot work, sorry, I disagree. It cannot be exactly like the games, thats a given, but the story certainly can be streamlined and optimized for film. (you guys do realize that you can sweep all the primary characters "side" stories into flashbacks/background info/whatever and establish those in literally seconds, 90% of the stuff in the codexs are not needed to establish the setting, just key things/locations. Take out all of the "side" missions, then you already have a much more manageable story.)

Yeah, the special effects will be expensive, but who are you guys kidding, they can do practically anything in film now. (seriously, Avatar, Tron, Warriors Way, Star Trek, Sucker Punch, etc, etc, etc)

Legendary pictures has always come through when it counts, give them the budget and a good director and they can make pretty much anything happen. (yeah, I loved the Watchmen, but haters gonna hate)

No one gives a crap about a few whiners on the net (because it will happen no matter what), the story will have to be altered and streamlined for film, has to happen. (Case in point, see the Walking Dead, altered? Yup, but still utterly fantastic.)

In short, Paragon, Shepard, Reapers, Trilogy..........

Do it.

Modifié par AudioCGlive, 22 novembre 2010 - 05:39 .

[XtremeGoose]

I dislike a movie of the mass effect 1/2 story, because I already know the plot. I have played through the plot many times before. However, I would not mind a prequal to mass effect 1, including shepard or not. My preferance would be an entirely new story, with an entirely new protagonist, with some new, and some old settings.

[Noble chief_]

Good to know!

[HelplessLemur]

I am going to buy tickets before anybody else trust me.

[IrishGunman]

This movie can be an epic fail, or a great success.

[Alienmorph]

Indeed, I really hope that it will be the first video-game based movie able to maintain the awesomness of the franchise, not like those lame Resident Evil movies.

[MOELANDER]

Welp, I'd really like to see SHepard during the Skyllian Blitz. That would be awesome...

[Xiarmethes]

If this movie's a go, here are my picks for Commander Shepard
If they are going for the poster-boy John Shepard:                Dominic Purcell





If they go with a FemShep:                 Olivia Wilde

[JustinBB7]

Hahaha that guy from Prison Break is perfect for Shepard wow.

[MillaShepard]

Lauren Lee Smith to play Liara would be perrrrrrrfect!!

[MillaShepard]

static.tvguide.com/MediaBin/Galleries/Shows/A_F/Cq_Cz/CSI/season9/csi-lauren-lee-smith100.jpg

Here's a pic of Lauren Lee Smith.  I think she would make a perfect Liara.

[I_M_Krogan]

I found Jacob Taylor. He goes to my college.

Modifié par I_M_Krogan, 24 novembre 2010 - 05:27 .

[MillaShepard]

wow... He really is jacob.