Aller au contenu

Photo

Mass Effect Movie announced!


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
6698 réponses à ce sujet

#5676
nottoberude

nottoberude
  • Members
  • 30 messages
aaron eckhart as commander Shepard
http://snarkerati.co...ron-eckhart.jpg

#5677
nottoberude

nottoberude
  • Members
  • 30 messages
I saw Battle LA yesterday and now i could totally see it

#5678
Brother Takka

Brother Takka
  • Members
  • 398 messages

TriniGoonerChic wrote...

Soul_ArchitectZ wrote...

13lank wrote...

That could turn out to be a great movie! Just no bad directors plz.


J.
J.
Abrams.

Quite possibly the greatest director of our time.


Agreed! Love JJAbrams!

Legendary pictures and JJ would be an awesome combination. Maybe it might beat the curse of terible game to movie projects in the past.


You have to be kidding? The last 2 movies I've seen of his where medioca at best. Cloverfield's story made no seince what so ever. So meny plot holes, You've been impailed on a metal spike for 90% of the movie and survive a chopper crash, now run....like you could!

He put the finel nail in the Star Trek coffin.

#5679
RocShemp

RocShemp
  • Members
  • 221 messages

Brother Takka wrote...

TriniGoonerChic wrote...

Soul_ArchitectZ wrote...

13lank wrote...

That could turn out to be a great movie! Just no bad directors plz.


J.
J.
Abrams.

Quite possibly the greatest director of our time.


Agreed! Love JJAbrams!

Legendary pictures and JJ would be an awesome combination. Maybe it might beat the curse of terible game to movie projects in the past.


You have to be kidding? The last 2 movies I've seen of his where medioca at best. Cloverfield's story made no seince what so ever. So meny plot holes, You've been impailed on a metal spike for 90% of the movie and survive a chopper crash, now run....like you could!

He put the finel nail in the Star Trek coffin.


J.J. Abrams did NOT direct Cloverfield.  Matt Reeves directed Colverfield.

The only two movies J.J. Abrams ever directed were Mission Impossible III and Star Trek.  Both highly entertaining flicks.

#5680
Alex Mcpherson

Alex Mcpherson
  • Members
  • 15 messages
but so full of holes... I mean, earth to vulcan in what, 3 minutes? And it is clear in the film that there was no transition - it was essentially continuous from leaving that starbase through to running the debris gauntlet.

and that brings another - a ship the scale of the Kelvin with 800 people aboard, that's a *scoutship*?
I mean, seriously... WTF.

I don't put it all down to JJ on that though. I blame the writers.and the artists who couldn't make Nero and crew's tattoos look good with brow ridges, you know, like Romulans have?

anyway enough about that.

My point still stands on the TV thing.

Babylon 5 was a quality show, even thought he CG sucked. Their story carried it through, and only due to, you know, Meddling Management, did crusade not pick up.

How about, Firefly? That too, you know, 1 season, and was cancelled due to low ratings that were low because of Meddling Management at Fox. (The failure of TV shows due to these reasons has been dubbed 'The Firefly Effect'.)

Stargate Universe is the latest to suffer from this 'affliction', when they put season 2 in the most competitive spot they could find - against the 16-million-viewer-powerhouse that is CSI

Compared, you know, to the already proven track record of Sci Fi Fridays.

I mean, really... *10 seasons* of SG-1. Atlantis went 5 seasons, 2 of which without SG-1 as a lead-in show, and I think without Battlestar Galactica as it's lead-out show too. But when Season 10 was on, it was on on a friday, then atlantis, then galactica, and all 3 enjoyed very good ratings.

for shows that tend to be watched by the more tech-savvy viewers, meaning TIVO or other DVR timeshifting, or just plain downloading from the internet, that they both actually had 1.5 to 2 million viewers consistently was excellent.

SGU? Less than 1 million. First - bad advertiseing. Second - bad timing. and Third - they tried to shake it up into a character-driven drama piece too much for the existing Stargate fans to handle well. And if there's one thing that almost guarantees a show to the cancellation pile, is 'aiming the show at new non-fans'. Like trying to aim action flicks at those not into action, or. you know, star trek films at non-trekkies. That last one resulted in Star Trek Nemesis, and the horrendously named Star Trek. I mean, seriously, 'have you seen star trek?' 'which episode?' 'the film'. 'Which film?' 'what do you mean, which film, you know... Star Trek. With Kirk and Spock.' '...Oh, where the admiral takes command of the enterprise because deckers' useless?' 'who's decker?'

#5681
kenfury

kenfury
  • Members
  • 3 messages
Hugh Jackman would make a terrible Shepard. So would Keanu Reeves. They're both decent actors, but neither of them have what I think it takes to pull that off. Mark Vanderloo couldn't do it, because of his heavy accent, and let's face it....he's a model, not an actor. He might be able to do the part of they have Mark Meer go in and voice over his lines. If they did it like that, it might turn out well. I suspect, however, that the movie won't FEATURE Shepard. Maybe it's just me.

#5682
Darkspawn Reaper

Darkspawn Reaper
  • Members
  • 2 messages
Looking through this thread... Seeing no mention of the possibility of a FemShep lead.

Would love Bioware for doing that, just to see people's reactions.

#5683
vader da slayer

vader da slayer
  • Members
  • 479 messages
the reason why you won't see a female shepard has nothing to do with sexism or anything of that nature. the reason is very simple, because it make sense for Shepard to be male. why? there are 0 (yes zero as in none nadda nil) women in any special forces (N7 is a futuristic spec ops) at least within the US military (this includes Delta Force, Force Recon, Navy Seals etc). the reasons behind it are because of a rule keeping women from direct combat roles due to both physical and phsycological differences between men and women.

it just makes more logical sense that Shepard would be male rather than female due to real world reasons. combat is combat and in 150-200 years those base genetic differences between men and women of the human race are probably not going to change.

woudl it be interesting to see a female shepard? yes most definately as a female actor can bring things to the table that a male one cant and vice versa, but it doesn;t really make sense when compared to real life.

also if you don't believe me just do a bing or google search on it. in fact to my knowledge there has never been a female canadate that can come close to passing the physical portion of what is the minimum required to be even considered to be able to try for any of the above groups.

#5684
KieraShepard

KieraShepard
  • Members
  • 9 messages
Okay, I'm biased, but I would love to see a femshep lead. I mean, I'm super excited for this movie either way, but being familiar with both femshep and maleshep, I personally think femshep fits the storyline better.

Mass Effect is about impossible odds. Overcoming racial divisions, prejudice, doubt, fear, and blowing up reapers, despite it being a suicide mission. I think it makes sense to have a femshep because she is another example of impossible odds. Not only can a human lead a team of aliens and save the galaxy, that human is a female. Mass Effect is set in the future, and a lot can change. I know it isn't accurate in terms of modern day combat requirements, but hey, its a video game. Accuracy is optional. The Citadel also claims to use "centrifugal gravity", when the actual force behind rotational motion is centripetal. That doesn't make wandering around it any less fun.

Basically, I would like to see a femshep movie. I think it adds an extra layer, makes Shepard more interesting, deeper, because of what they've had to overcome to get there.

However, I will say that one of the most beautiful things about Mass Effect is that everyone's game is different. For me, femshep is the way to go. For others, not so much. Paragon, Renegade, Romance: it all changes. Ideally, they'd make two movies, a femshep version and a maleshep version. But that's not happening, so I'm looking at the movie as a side story, a different perspective of the universe I've come to love. Whoever Shep is, and whatever gender, so long as they kick some Reaper ass I'm ready.

Your thoughts?

#5685
KieraShepard

KieraShepard
  • Members
  • 9 messages

Rusty McFinger wrote...

This movie will be about Blasto, right?


Forget everything I just said. Let's just do this. XD

#5686
Guest_PryditorThalinx108_*

Guest_PryditorThalinx108_*
  • Guests
You know, I wouldn't mind seeing MShep or FemShep but the thing is that, I heard that Mass Effect was originally based on MaleShep but they only created FemShep to meet the requirements of fans demanding two genders or something about sexism, I wouldn't know. But I agree, they shouldn't make it about Shepard...somehow, I think that'll just ruin the entire thing...Just my opinion!

But...YES!! MOVIE!!

#5687
SpartanAaron001

SpartanAaron001
  • Members
  • 28 messages
Ok, they can't make a sequel set after ME3 because the divergence in the time-line would be so diverse from all the impacts Shepard has made since the beginning on his existence...

I suppose they could set it between ME1 and ME2 while Cerberus is rebuilding Shepard, and focus on some characters that build up to something that happens in ME2 or 3, so long as they don't touch any of the stuff Shepard had done...

But I am Kind of hoping on a Prequel, as it wont invalidate any events later on...

First Contact wars, Rachni Wars, Revelation, or hell even the discovery of the citadel could be decent if wrote well and the non-existence of humans at that time could make it different.

Modifié par SpartanAaron001, 20 mars 2011 - 12:02 .


#5688
KieraShepard

KieraShepard
  • Members
  • 9 messages
Yeah, a prequel could be nice. I like the idea of setting it between ME1 and 2, though. That's one dark spot that isn't filled in much. I'm looking forward to seeing what they come up with...

#5689
Razorburn

Razorburn
  • Members
  • 58 messages

KieraShepard wrote...

Basically, I would like to see a femshep movie. I think it adds an extra layer, makes Shepard more interesting, deeper, because of what they've had to overcome to get there.

Extra layer? What kind of layer?

KieraShepard wrote...

Mass Effect is about impossible odds. Overcoming racial divisions, prejudice, doubt, fear, and blowing up reapers, despite it being a suicide mission. I think it makes sense to have a femshep because she is another example of impossible odds.

Mass Effect isn't about impossible odds. Not to me anyway. It's an epic tale about a character/group of characters on an important quest which could affect the world/country/galaxy/etc. Achilles in the Trojan War, King Arthur and his knights, the duels of Musashi; these aren't about overcoming racial divisions, doubt, or fear. The heroes may experience a situation which might bring out fear or doubt in others, but that doesn't define the story. Actually, what makes the characters heroic is their ability to shine when things get tough; which brings the sentiment "only _ could have done that." Shepard was already N7 when ME1 started... the best the human race had to offer. You can't get more elite than him. There was no special Spectre training, only a test. Spectre is just a formality to him, because he's already the most elite of the elite.

KieraShepard wrote...

Accuracy is optional. The Citadel also claims to use "centrifugal gravity", when the actual force behind rotational motion is centripetal.

What!? Accuracy is not optional, it's necessary. However, in areas of science writers have some leeway, especially in future settings or alternate realities. You have clearly dabbled in science, so I don't have to remind you how little we know about the universe and how often it changes.

#5690
jamesraylor

jamesraylor
  • Members
  • 32 messages
First Movie The blitz ending where the Game started. Meer as Shep, Because as long as Shep sounds Like Shep he is...Well Shep. See If you can't get Riddle Scott to Direct, I think He could nail it, him or Spielberg.

#5691
Feena.c

Feena.c
  • Members
  • 63 messages
I don't think Mark Meer should play Shepard in the movie. I don't want to get all ranty on him cause I do like him so I'll just leave it at that.
Personally, the only actor I would really like to see carried over would be Martin Sheen.
But really if they do Shepard and them I would rather see a complete re-cast.
When dealing with games to film, or anything which previously had voices, I would rather they just completyely re-imagine it.
I'd like to see a different take on Shepard's story that remains true to the "feel" of Mass Effect, rather than just a direct transfer that may or may not match with my story for Shepard. That way I won't feel annoyed if their version of Shepard makes different choices than mine. He/she is not the same Shepard, so no conflict.

Oh, and a Blitz movie would be awesome!

Modifié par Feena.c, 20 mars 2011 - 09:38 .


#5692
OrumRod

OrumRod
  • Members
  • 36 messages
In my opinion, the movie being about Shepard and the videgame's storyline would be the best choice because that would allow new audience to know this awesome bioware's master piece.
I'd love to go to the theater with my family and having them become fans of mass effect :P

#5693
KieraShepard

KieraShepard
  • Members
  • 9 messages

Razorburn wrote...

KieraShepard wrote...

Basically, I would like to see a femshep movie. I think it adds an extra layer, makes Shepard more interesting, deeper, because of what they've had to overcome to get there.

Extra layer? What kind of layer?

KieraShepard wrote...

Mass Effect is about impossible odds. Overcoming racial divisions, prejudice, doubt, fear, and blowing up reapers, despite it being a suicide mission. I think it makes sense to have a femshep because she is another example of impossible odds.

Mass Effect isn't about impossible odds. Not to me anyway. It's an epic tale about a character/group of characters on an important quest which could affect the world/country/galaxy/etc. Achilles in the Trojan War, King Arthur and his knights, the duels of Musashi; these aren't about overcoming racial divisions, doubt, or fear. The heroes may experience a situation which might bring out fear or doubt in others, but that doesn't define the story. Actually, what makes the characters heroic is their ability to shine when things get tough; which brings the sentiment "only _ could have done that." Shepard was already N7 when ME1 started... the best the human race had to offer. You can't get more elite than him. There was no special Spectre training, only a test. Spectre is just a formality to him, because he's already the most elite of the elite.

KieraShepard wrote...

Accuracy is optional. The Citadel also claims to use "centrifugal gravity", when the actual force behind rotational motion is centripetal.

What!? Accuracy is not optional, it's necessary. However, in areas of science writers have some leeway, especially in future settings or alternate realities. You have clearly dabbled in science, so I don't have to remind you how little we know about the universe and how often it changes.


For me, the "extra layer" is just that it creates an underlying conflict, that femshep had to overcome some gender prejudices to be the best of the best. It's a small layer, but it's there, for me at least.

Your point about it being a space epic: You're totally right. There is that, and I was overlooking it. I think, though, that there is still some truth to the idea that Shepard and his/her team are attempting the impossible. That's an integral part of the space epic flair. :)

Accuracy being optional...well...it sort of is in fiction like this. Accuracy provides immersion, and it's important, but not every detail has to be exact. I said that to counter the claim that femshep isn't canon because females aren't in the special forces. In the mass effect world, they can be, plain and simple. Maybe their suits amplify physical strength, who knows? But just like science, military technology, methods, and structure changes all the time. Not too long ago, we were fighting on horseback and women were at home making pie. :D Mass Effect is in 2183. A lot can change, including gender roles.

So yeah, my personal favorite is still femshep. Maleshep feels a little cliche to me, and I guess I like the idea that gender roles could have changed so drastically by 2183. I am in no way bashing maleshep, who is still quite badass. :)

#5694
Sigyn2011

Sigyn2011
  • Members
  • 121 messages
 Actually, I'm rather hoping that the movie does NOT focus around Shepard.  I'm interested in the events that would shape his/her career before that, perhaps involving the First Contact War or the Morning War.  Perhaps even something involving the discovery of the Protheans (from the human perspective).  The ME video game trilogy is specifically dedicated to Shepard and everything he/she does.  I really doubt that Bioware's writers would actually allow the movie focus to be about Shepard, and I would be sorely disappointed should they do that, namely, for three reasons.

First of all, how in the heck could you even cast Shepard?  You are allowed to choose either gender in the game!  Secondly, YOU (as the player) can make pretty much ALL of the decisions involving his/her psychological profile (in ME 1).  Thirdly, YOU (again as the player) decide if you want to be a hero or a badass throughout everything.  Sorry, but, I don't think that the writers at Bioware would do this to us if they have any respect for the series at all.  They've worked so hard on all of the extra stuff (like in the codex entries), why shouldn't they be able to expound upon it?

*Sigh*, if they DO make a movie about Shepard...I'd pick somebody like Scott Foley be him.  He was amazing for the Unit--I only saw about five or six episodes of that series, but I liked it.  Or maybe for a female Shep, hmm...that woman from Eureeka on the sci-fi network...Erica Cerra.  She's a total badass; but, like I said, this would be a BAD move, in my opinion.  

I am glad that there will be a movie out, though!  Here's hoping that our friends at Bioware make it awesome!  :kissing:

#5695
Sigyn2011

Sigyn2011
  • Members
  • 121 messages

RocShemp wrote...

Brother Takka wrote...

TriniGoonerChic wrote...

Soul_ArchitectZ wrote...

13lank wrote...

That could turn out to be a great movie! Just no bad directors plz.


J.
J.
Abrams.

Quite possibly the greatest director of our time.


Agreed! Love JJAbrams!

Legendary pictures and JJ would be an awesome combination. Maybe it might beat the curse of terible game to movie projects in the past.


You have to be kidding? The last 2 movies I've seen of his where medioca at best. Cloverfield's story made no seince what so ever. So meny plot holes, You've been impailed on a metal spike for 90% of the movie and survive a chopper crash, now run....like you could!

He put the finel nail in the Star Trek coffin.


J.J. Abrams did NOT direct Cloverfield.  Matt Reeves directed Colverfield.

The only two movies J.J. Abrams ever directed were Mission Impossible III and Star Trek.  Both highly entertaining flicks.


NO WAY!  J.J. Abrams is not the best director!  He's a great writer and producer (loved Alias and MI 3).  However, I would pick someone like M. Night Shymalan, John Woo, the Wachowski Brothers, or shoot, maybe Stephen Spielberg.  Ok, perhaps Shymalan might not be interested in making an action film, but has everyone forgotten about the Sixth Sense?  His direction was amazing--reminds me a LOT of Alfred hitchcock.  And yeah, even hitchcock could direct an action film (north by northwest, strangers on a train, to catch a thief).  Too many movies nowadays are going for the 'shaky camera' thing that makes me want to puke.  Long camera shots of battles are best, which is exactly what the Wachowski Bros and John Woo do VERY well.  Too much American cinema has up close and personal battles, which is ok, I guess, but...we've seen enough of that.  The W. Brothers proved it could be done in the Matrix Trilogy (as well as 'bullet time'), and besides, they could probably use a good project.  Lord knows, they haven't come up with any decent since then.

#5696
Teamsleeper

Teamsleeper
  • Members
  • 67 messages
who cares about JJ Abarhams ?! GIMME CHRISTOPHER NOLAN !!!!

#5697
Rockpopple

Rockpopple
  • Members
  • 3 100 messages
Please don't turn Sovereign into some douche in a black armoured suit who wants to rule the galaxy or whatever else stupid.

If it's just a shortened adaptation of what happened in Mass Effect 1 or 2, I will be pleased. Changing anything to appease the censors or whatever Family Council is complaining today or to get a PG rating so it can make more money will make me BURN YOU ALL.

#5698
Sigyn2011

Sigyn2011
  • Members
  • 121 messages

Teamsleeper wrote...

who cares about JJ Abarhams ?! GIMME CHRISTOPHER NOLAN !!!!


I like all of his stuff, but he's got a problem with long shots of fighting scenes.  I don't think he knows how to film them properly yet.  Besides, Mass Effect is not a psychological thriller (well, neither were the Batman films).  He does those best.:wizard:

#5699
Juggalomax

Juggalomax
  • Members
  • 1 messages
Daniel Craig as Shepard, he has that little "american hero" look about him. Not that that is good but they made the game so american-style, like all american movies with a happy ending and a handsome hero (perhaps becuse bioware is american?). Anyway its a great game and if they make the shepard storyline into a movie, the cast must be, as said, Craig-Shepard, Seth Green-Joker.. nuff said

#5700
ME_Fan

ME_Fan
  • Members
  • 1 368 messages

Juggalomax wrote...

Daniel Craig as Shepard, he has that little "american hero" look about him. Not that that is good but they made the game so american-style, like all american movies with a happy ending and a handsome hero (perhaps becuse bioware is american?). Anyway its a great game and if they make the shepard storyline into a movie, the cast must be, as said, Craig-Shepard, Seth Green-Joker.. nuff said


1. Daniel Craig is British. He played bond you know? James Bond who is british.
2. Also, Bioware is a canadian company, not US

Gee, get your facts right.Posted Image