smalvarado wrote...
As long a Seth Green plays Joker, I'm 100% on board with this.
Agreed. This is as important as who will play Commander Shepard.
smalvarado wrote...
As long a Seth Green plays Joker, I'm 100% on board with this.
Ross42899 wrote...
What's all the talking about a CGI movie? If I want a CGI movie I play the game and watch the cut scenes. If there's really a ME movie coming it has to be live action with real actors.
BTW:
As some people already said: The best would be a movie based on ME (set in the ME universe) with some familar characters from the games showing up and not a complete retelling of one of the games (as we already know the whole story/plot line)
ezangrando wrote...
InvisiShepard wrote...
In the eternal words of Ian Malcolm, one of the survivors of the famous JURASSIC PARK incident, "This is possibly the worst idea, in the history of bad ideas"
WE DON'T NEED A MOVIE!
It will be a horrible, terrible mockery of of both good cinema and good video games unless the studio, director or anyone heavily involved in production fully understands and respects the concept of video games & video game storytelling and/or has played & enjoyed Mass Effect.
Otherwise they will treat it like a joke and slap together a 90 minute explosion fest with no heart or soul. With Mortal Kombat, Doom & even Tomb Raider it did not matter because they did not have much of a story anyway and were already established franchises with a huge fan base. Mass Effect by comparison is still in it's infancy.
What they should do is pull off another STAR WARS gambit and use the movie to create an expanded universe. The movie could be about anything BUT Commander Shepard's story but that will not happen because Hollywood is run by money grabbing parasites.
Our only hope is that we get a good director like JJ Abrams considering the similarity to STAR TREK coupled with Drew Karypshn writing the story with another good scriptwriter (John Nolan please?) in place of the I AM LEGEND hack.
The involvement of Ray Muzyka, Greg Zeschuck and Casey Hudson is merely for good PR, even if they talk an active role, the producers will simply shove them away and entertain their ideas superficially. And we the fans will be fed sweet honey over how everything is super duper perfect and the whole bioware dev team loves the script but it will all be PR nonsense. The fateful day comes, the movie flops and Mass Effect becomes a laughing stock for a few days
The wounds will heal but the scar remains.... no amount of PARAGON points can heal them
Don't anyone dare claim I am trolling for speaking the truth.
you are a lot catastrophic
massranger wrote...
Kenthen wrote...
massranger wrote...
Kenthen wrote...
This is an awful idea. If the movie actually focuses on Shepard then it's the dumbest idea I've ever heard in my entire life.
So awful they will laugh all the way to the bank with the money you paid to see three times, and the money you paid for the DVD/BRD. Seriously people quit acting like you won't see it because it's a bad idea, you all will see it.
Yeah that makes sense, I mean I'm not at all interested and think the idea of a ME movie (or game movies in general) is retarded but gosh golly gee whillickers I sure will watch it not once, not twice but three times and buy the DVD.
Coming from someone that who's signature is, "I'm harbinger, and this is my favorite store on the citadel," your right, you are way to cool to see a movie about a video game.
Here is an idea, if you really have no interest in the movie, why waste all this time saying that you have no interest? Kinda doesn't make sense, and if you really didn't care or don't want to see it... then don't...
InvisiShepard wrote...
I doubt the studious will give a damn. Hollywood still thinks video games are lame and for children. They laugh at the concept of a video game actually having story and characters. Video games are always presented in a negetive light in films. It will be severely watered down and kept as GOD FEARING WHITE AMERICAN FAMILY friendly as possible. So no alien loving or anything, Wrex will be killed and Garrus will be shown as a villain who runs off with Saren because the aliens have non-American beliefs and that's bad
Kenthen wrote...
massranger wrote...
Kenthen wrote...
massranger wrote...
Kenthen wrote...
This is an awful idea. If the movie actually focuses on Shepard then it's the dumbest idea I've ever heard in my entire life.
So awful they will laugh all the way to the bank with the money you paid to see three times, and the money you paid for the DVD/BRD. Seriously people quit acting like you won't see it because it's a bad idea, you all will see it.
Yeah that makes sense, I mean I'm not at all interested and think the idea of a ME movie (or game movies in general) is retarded but gosh golly gee whillickers I sure will watch it not once, not twice but three times and buy the DVD.
Coming from someone that who's signature is, "I'm harbinger, and this is my favorite store on the citadel," your right, you are way to cool to see a movie about a video game.
Here is an idea, if you really have no interest in the movie, why waste all this time saying that you have no interest? Kinda doesn't make sense, and if you really didn't care or don't want to see it... then don't...
Yeah and I absolutely said that "I'm too cool", it's not like you pulled that out of your ass.
Here's a better idea though, I'll post and you'll deal with it, not everyone has to like everything and this thread isn't a circle jerk.
InvisiShepard wrote...
I doubt the studious will give a damn. Hollywood still thinks video games are lame and for children. They laugh at the concept of a video game actually having story and characters. Video games are always presented in a negetive light in films. It will be severely watered down and kept as GOD FEARING WHITE AMERICAN FAMILY friendly as possible. So no alien loving or anything, Wrex will be killed and Garrus will be shown as a villain who runs off with Saren because the aliens have non-American beliefs and that's bad
IndomitusRex wrote...
This certainly has a lot of potential. It has the potential to be fantastic, but it also has the potential to fall flat on its face. But with Priestly and the Doctors on board to keep a tight rein on things, I lean more towards hopeful than fearful.
The choice of the story is a Citadel-sized bone of contention. Should the story involve Shepard, who is obviously the most central character in the ME universe, or should they let the trilogy stand on its own, and do something else in the ME universe? I'd like to see Shepard, Garrus, Wrex, and the rest brought to life on the big screen, but portraying the trilogy in film-form has a lot of possible pitfalls.
One of those pitfalls, however, is not Shepard's gender. Sorry ladies, but Shepard is a dude. Can anyone recall seeing fem-Shepard in any of the ME2 commercials? John Shepard is just more iconic, and more marketable.
Others have brought up the First Contact War as a possible setting for a Mass Effect movie, and I think that could definitely work. Get the essence of ME, without stepping on any toes. Telling Captain Anderson's story (from the first novel) could work as well, though unfortunately Keith David is too old to play the character in live action.
IndomitusRex wrote...
This certainly has a lot of potential. It has the potential to be fantastic, but it also has the potential to fall flat on its face. But with Priestly and the Doctors on board to keep a tight rein on things, I lean more towards hopeful than fearful.
The choice of the story is a Citadel-sized bone of contention. Should the story involve Shepard, who is obviously the most central character in the ME universe, or should they let the trilogy stand on its own, and do something else in the ME universe? I'd like to see Shepard, Garrus, Wrex, and the rest brought to life on the big screen, but portraying the trilogy in film-form has a lot of possible pitfalls.
One of those pitfalls, however, is not Shepard's gender. Sorry ladies, but Shepard is a dude. Can anyone recall seeing fem-Shepard in any of the ME2 commercials? John Shepard is just more iconic, and more marketable.
Others have brought up the First Contact War as a possible setting for a Mass Effect movie, and I think that could definitely work. Get the essence of ME, without stepping on any toes. Telling Captain Anderson's story (from the first novel) could work as well, though unfortunately Keith David is too old to play the character in live action.
Modifié par screwoffreg, 27 mai 2010 - 06:54 .
Well that is a book to movie adaptation the same rules don't apply. Film adaptions of novel are more of a visual realization of the novel it self. I think having the entire ME1 plot condensed into a 3 hour movie would be a complete waste of my time. Everyone who has played ME1 knows what happens so do you really wanna see that in movie form? Also let's look at every game adaptation film ever made. They all suck. We also have novels and comic books that are set in the ME universe but, they don't follow they same story arcs of the games. Bioware made KOTOR which wasn't the same story arc as the movies but, it still had an amazing storyline. Why can't a movie do the same? Why does a movie have to be a retelling of the game? It would be more interesting see a new plot within the universe. A new story arc does have the potenial to have a really good plot and great characters. Plus this isn't just "someone" who would be writing a new story, bioware is over seeing the production of the movie.Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Grittygreenhorn wrote...
The reasons behind NOT involving the Shepherd character goes far beyond selfish desires of players. Some have written it could be done, but should it be done? This movie should not be an exercise for the movie producers to see if they can make a game adaptation, it should be about breathing MORE LIFE into the ME universe. Stories survive on their re-readability and this argument about Shepherd is a red herring. It does not matter if each player's Shepherd is unique or not, this is about expanding the storyline of ME. Therefore, the repetition of the Shepherd story, which is already being told in the games, would be insulting to the fans and stagnate the franchise.
Insulting? Stagnate?
What are you smoking man?
You have a interesting and well-thought out story that's engaging and populated wiht interesting character. Pure gold.
Yet you want for someone to create a completely new story for the movie? That's...rather stupid. And risky.
RE-telling of a story is not insulting. You're jsut delluding yourself. This is about selfish desires, you just don't want to admitt it. You complain about a movie before it's out. On what basis? "I've heard that story before?" That is jsut stupid.
That's like saying LOTR the move will suck, because you already read hte book and you have a mental image of how Aragorn should look like. And Viggo Mortessen doens't look liek him. Tehrefore, the move is an insult to all Tolkien fans!
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InsaneTrollLogic
InsaneTrollLogic much?



Modifié par TheWhiteRice, 27 mai 2010 - 07:00 .