450 réponses à ce sujet

[Haggard 511]

This is my second post. I hate this idea. That is all.

[Dinkamus_Littlelog]

CoreMagus wrote...

Love the drama about this, do you guys lack free will? Will the game force you to play Co-op or Multiplayer and what is stopping you from just playing the singelplayer part? instead you go "HURR DURR DEM GAIS @ BIOWARE RUIN DE GAEM WIT COOP AND MP, I WILL NOT BUY THIS GAME DURR HURR."

Wtb a ME3 with Singelplayer, Co-op and a multiplayer part

Do you lack free will? Why dont you go play one of the dozens of other games that offer multiplayer? Why must every single game waste time, money, and resources making sure to tack on a stupid multiplayer so idiots can frag eachother or AI enemies?

[cachx]

MrBlazay wrote...

It would be fun if it was co op.. but there is a alot of talking so that might be a problem for players who aren't true fans

Ah yes, "True Fans". Lots of people are falling into this trope as of late.

Thankfully Overlord DLC will be here soon and people will go play it and stop the b*tching, if only for a little while...

[TheShogunOfHarlem]

CoreMagus wrote...

Love the drama about this, do you guys lack free will? Will the game force you to play Co-op or Multiplayer and what is stopping you from just playing the singelplayer part? instead you go "HURR DURR DEM GAIS @ BIOWARE RUIN DE GAEM WIT COOP AND MP, I WILL NOT BUY THIS GAME DURR HURR."

Wtb a ME3 with Singelplayer, Co-op and a multiplayer part

I don't think that is most peoples' issue with a MP or CO-OP element. Many people (myself included) think that time spent on e=developing MP would take away resources and energy in making a Strong SP campaign with a high replay value. Rightfully so.  Looking at the current state of many popular games, many of them forgo even attempting to make their SP game with a high replay value and focus all of their attention in MP replayability.

[Vena_86]

MP will hurt SP one way or the other. Either by taking away development time or changing the game design to make MP possible, resulting in worse than possible storytelling and depth.

The franchise started to become a mainstream sell out, now the transformation becomes complete.



Looking at the progress, Dragon Age 2 will probably also be a coop Hack&Slay.

Bye BioWare, welcome EAware.

[DarthRomance]

I think you are all underestimating how easy it is to slap on multiplayer to a game.

[NvVanity]

I wouldn't say multiplayer spells doom for the great story telling we love about Bioware. It's not common for games to have a great single player and multiplayer without the two subtracting from each other but its possible. Prime example: Metal Gear Solid 4. Great single player and story that seems like it could be a movie (well one hour long cutscenes...) and fun multiplayer people still play today.



Whatever Bioware's decision is on multiplayer i'm sure they'll still make a great solid story for Mass Effect 3.

[Spartas Husky]

DarthRomance wrote...

I think you are all underestimating how easy it is to slap on multiplayer to a game.

And most fail to admit...with a certain amount of time and resources, something has to give.

If you divide the effort into doing  coop or multiplayer the story and overall single player will pay in quality

[CoreMagus]

Dinkamus_Littlelog wrote...

CoreMagus wrote...

Love the drama about this, do you guys lack free will? Will the game force you to play Co-op or Multiplayer and what is stopping you from just playing the singelplayer part? instead you go "HURR DURR DEM GAIS @ BIOWARE RUIN DE GAEM WIT COOP AND MP, I WILL NOT BUY THIS GAME DURR HURR."

Wtb a ME3 with Singelplayer, Co-op and a multiplayer part

So
Do you lack free will? Why dont you go play one of the dozens of other games that offer multiplayer? Why must every single game waste time, money, and resources making sure to tack on a stupid multiplayer so idiots can frag eachother or AI enemies?

And it certain that Bioware will blow it all on a game that is still early in development. Let's not forget that it is Bioware we are talking about here.

[TheShogunOfHarlem]

There are some exceptions, but they are hardly the rule. MGS4 is one along with GTA 4, but I can't think of any others. I don't know what BW's plan would be if implemented. The best case scenario is they place MP on a separate disc and release it sometime after ME3's release. Now I think they should focus on the SP heavily. See what worked in ME1 and 2 take into consideration some of the reasonable issues people had with ME2 and make the best damn replayable game they can.



Right now I've only cared to play both ME1 and 2 more than once to completion. Most other games that I have beaten are gathering dust. (they are fun and at best have a decent replay value to me but time constricts me) Plus generally MP doesn't really interest me. Only GTA 4 kept my interest for any length of time. To me MP isn't really living up to it's potential so I don't really care for it.

[CoreMagus]

Vena_86 wrote...

MP will hurt SP one way or the other. Either by taking away development time or changing the game design to make MP possible, resulting in worse than possible storytelling and depth.
The franchise started to become a mainstream sell out, now the transformation becomes complete.

And a MP mode such as Team deathmatch is so very difficult so very hard to implement, They allready have their selection of classes, their upsides and downsides. And who says they can not borrow ideas from other games to use in the MP?

Also.

Looking at the progress, Dragon Age 2 will probably also be a coop Hack&Slay. 
Bye BioWare, welcome EAware.

NWN/NWN2 much.

[CoreMagus]

TheShogunOfHarlem wrote...

There are some exceptions, but they are hardly the rule. MGS4 is one along with GTA 4, but I can't think of any others. I don't know what BW's plan would be if implemented. The best case scenario is they place MP on a separate disc and release it sometime after ME3's release. Now I think they should focus on the SP heavily. See what worked in ME1 and 2 take into consideration some of the reasonable issues people had with ME2 and make the best damn replayable game they can.

Right now I've only cared to play both ME1 and 2 more than once to completion. Most other games that I have beaten are gathering dust. (they are fun and at best have a decent replay value to me but time constricts me) Plus generally MP doesn't really interest me. Only GTA 4 kept my interest for any length of time. To me MP isn't really living up to it's potential so I don't really care for it.

And that they will, i have no doupt that Bioware will put the most effort into the singelplayer mode and then their MP and Co-op spinoffs.

[TheShogunOfHarlem]

CoreMagus wrote...

TheShogunOfHarlem wrote...

There are some exceptions, but they are hardly the rule. MGS4 is one along with GTA 4, but I can't think of any others. I don't know what BW's plan would be if implemented. The best case scenario is they place MP on a separate disc and release it sometime after ME3's release. Now I think they should focus on the SP heavily. See what worked in ME1 and 2 take into consideration some of the reasonable issues people had with ME2 and make the best damn replayable game they can.

Right now I've only cared to play both ME1 and 2 more than once to completion. Most other games that I have beaten are gathering dust. (they are fun and at best have a decent replay value to me but time constricts me) Plus generally MP doesn't really interest me. Only GTA 4 kept my interest for any length of time. To me MP isn't really living up to it's potential so I don't really care for it.

And that they will, i have no doupt that Bioware will put the most effort into the singelplayer mode and then their MP and Co-op spinoffs.

If that's the case then I can care less if they do have a MP. That's their call. I would only ask that it not be a stupid run and gun session like most MP experiences are. (basically it shouldn't appeal to the lowest common denominator) I would prefer a tactical gameplay with vehicles, Large maps and environmental destructibility.

Side note: If i hear anybody whining about "campers/camping" I will hunt you down.  

[fireskull]

I highly doubt Bioware would look into multiplayer if they didn't think they could keep the quality they have always had with it. That could always apply towards co-op as well, you never know.

[Boombox]

Yeah I don't want multiplayer either.. It will take away from the single player experience that Mass Effect is so well known for.



Maybe in future games, but please just finish the trilogy with an amazing story before messing with the concept.

[HTTP 404]

NOOOO!



actually i dont care if they have mass effect rock band feature as long as the single player experience is awesome

[HTTP 404]

Boombox wrote...

Yeah I don't want multiplayer either.. It will take away from the single player experience that Mass Effect is so well known for.

Maybe in future games, but please just finish the trilogy with an amazing story before messing with the concept.

I just dont see how multiplayer and extra features affect single player experience? please elaborate.

FYI i dont plan on playing the multiplayer

[Nivenus]

EA_BiowareAccount wrote...

Boombox wrote...

Yeah I don't want multiplayer either.. It will take away from the single player experience that Mass Effect is so well known for.

Maybe in future games, but please just finish the trilogy with an amazing story before messing with the concept.

I just dont see how multiplayer and extra features affect single player experience? please elaborate.

FYI i dont plan on playing the multiplayer

People are worried, not entirely without reason but also out of proportion I think, that developing multiplayer would take resources away from singleplayer. However, in my experience, good multiplayer =/= bad singleplayer. Sometimes a team is very good at one thing and not the other, but enough times in my experience it seems that one could can be good at both things.

Not to mention that EA, as of recent, has started using different teams to develop singleplayer and multiplayer in the games that have both (for instance, DICE will do the multiplayer - but not the singleplayer- for the new Medal of Honor).

[ManBearPig91]

No multiplayer.

[Lougi]

Nivenus wrote...

Not to mention that EA, as of recent, has started using different teams to develop singleplayer and multiplayer in the games that have both (for instance, DICE will do the multiplayer - but not the singleplayer- for the new Medal of Honor).

This. Right. Here.

Stop assuming people. Seriously. BioWare hasn't elaborated to any degree regarding this. Have some faith in the company that's delivered so many great games that I'm sure many of you have enjoyed over the years. Implicit faith? No. I'm just saying to wait until some real details surface.

Multiplayer can be done well without harming the SP component. Take a look at Bioshock 2. It certainly wasn't hurt by having MP. On the contrary, I feel it added something. They approached it properly (Separate team), something I'm sure BioWare will do. MP was an entirely separate entity, not tacked on, and not stealing resources from the SP.

I'm sure this post won't change anyone's mind, but whatever. My $.02.

[Hazelrah10]

Any resources that might be used for multi-player should be used instead to enhance/extend single player.

[Sean]

Only if they make it a co-op RPG then multiplayer could work

and that could be fun, it could make the same missions over and over be different when you have your friend playing it with you (maybe to replace the ****** squadmates you have)

[Landline]

Make if co-op if they want, but if they try to so much as encourage me to use multiplayer features or make sacrifices to other sections in the game and I will be really, really pissed off.



I don't like playing things multiplayer. I am a lone wolf.

[Massadonious1]

[ranger614]

Jack > You.