35 réponses à ce sujet

[Ashton808]

There is only one Turian in the galaxy that has as much badass as Garrus. He should be replacement if Bioware decides to replace Garrus. No Vorcha is safe when........

CAPTAIN GAVORN IS HERE!

"Vorcha? Plan? Ha ha ha ha ha!




Gavorn is probably more badass than this so called "Garrus". Isn't that right Gavorn?


Of course it is right Captain!


VORCHA HAVE NO PLAN!


(A little fun thread to support Gavorn and let some people get to know him, Garrus fans, please do not be affended)

[Pacifien]

Tell Captain Gavorn we no recruit him today!

[Ashton808]

Gavorn: Gavorn? No recruit? Aw aw aw aw aw......

[Sand King]

We know Gavorn's tricks. We leave!

[Ashton808]

Gavorn put me up to this idea!

[Mr.BlazenGlazen]

Garrus not in ME3? Hahahahahahahahaha

[Some Dude]

Mr.BlazenGlazen wrote...

Garrus not in ME3? Hahahahahahahahaha

AGREED LAUGHTER.

[Spartas Husky]

Mr.BlazenGlazen wrote...

Garrus not in ME3? Hahahahahahahahaha

so true so true....

[Alexine]

Mr.BlazenGlazen wrote...

Garrus not in ME3? Hahahahahahahahaha

This

If it were true... then all hell shall break loose.

[Collider]

No one can replace Garrus.

Not even Garrus can replace Garrus
www.youtube.com/watch

[Christmas Ape]

How could Garrus not be in ME3 unless the 'canon' decides he dies? It seems pretty clear he's figured out he does his best, most effective work with Shepard, to say nothing of their personal bonds. I cannot begin to imagine what he'd do with himself if it wasn't "work with Commander Shepard", unless somehow Shepard manages to pull strings to get him his own Spectre induction.

[Collider]

Christmas Ape wrote...

How could Garrus not be in ME3 unless the 'canon' decides he dies? It seems pretty clear he's figured out he does his best, most effective work with Shepard, to say nothing of their personal bonds. I cannot begin to imagine what he'd do with himself if it wasn't "work with Commander Shepard", unless somehow Shepard manages to pull strings to get him his own Spectre induction.

This.

[lovgreno]

It seems that Garrus is slowly taking over the lead role from Shepard so no way death would keep him away from ME3. I mean this guy showers in autocannon fire and eats rockets in his requitment mission.



But in the horrible, unthinkable and impossible situation of having to pick a replacement turian for Garrus I would make his old flexible sparring partner fill Garrus shoes. But they should both be in the crew of course.

[Spartas Husky]

If Tali or Garrus dont come back...is like Replacing the weapons in MW3 for gardening hose and flower petals.....financial suicide period.

[Pacifien]

I am curious if the developers will really take all possible suicide mission outcomes into account (aside from the one where Shepard is dead) when developing ME3. Because in that sense, Garrus could very well not be available. A great many squadmates could not be available, and Shepard might need to get a few replacements.

And before some cries out "no more recruiting!" this scenario would only apply to those who imported a suicide mission outcome with deaths. If you import a perfect run, you could very well have no reason to recruit anyone else.

And before someone says other players should be punished if they got anyone on the suicide mission killed, they're not taking into account that 1) people outside of this forum who don't have a million suicide mission guides to look at could very well have squadmates dead unintentionally and not on purpose, 2) you don't give players a choice, tote your game is about choices, then turn around and punish the player for making "bad" choices, and 3) that they're possibly taking it too seriously.

Still, why recruit Gavorn if Lorik Qui'in is a perfectly better replacement?

[CalJones]

Gavorn is the second most handsome turian in the galaxy but even he cannot hold a candle to the awesomeness that is Garrus.

[Christmas Ape]

Pacifien wrote...
Still, why recruit Gavorn if Lorik Qui'in is a perfectly better replacement?

Because Qui'in is an executive, not a C-Sec agent or private security contractor? Which is to say, he's not a perfectly better replacement barring Mass Effect 3: Shepard Fills Out Expense Reports.

[Neria Rose]

CalJones wrote...

Gavorn is the second most handsome turian in the galaxy but even he cannot hold a candle to the awesomeness that is Garrus.

Quoted for truth! Well, kinda truth.. Lorik Qui'in is the second most handsome >.>..

[Pacifien]

Christmas Ape wrote...

Pacifien wrote...
Still, why recruit Gavorn if Lorik Qui'in is a perfectly better replacement?

Because Qui'in is an executive, not a C-Sec agent or private security contractor? Which is to say, he's not a perfectly better replacement barring Mass Effect 3: Shepard Fills Out Expense Reports.

Oh, you limit yourself to the possibilities. Corporate espionage and infiltration into the most secure port for various corporations looking to walk the fine line between reputability and nefarious research. Qui'in is perfect. His superpower is disdain.

[STG]

Collider wrote...

No one can replace Garrus.

Not even Garrus can replace Garrus
www.youtube.com/watch

LoL this comment just cracks me up:

"Garrus, stay with Garrus. Keep him alive."
"That's a rather
impressive looking turian."
"That's a rather impressive looking
sniper rifle."
"Impressive."
"Impressive."

[Mykel54]

That turian needs to slap some face paint in there, but even there it wouldn´t hold a candle to Garrus

[epoch_]

Garrus CAN NOT be replaced.

[sergio71785]

I can already see one of his abilities now:

Gavorns Tricks: Causes targetted vorcha to flee

But yeah, Garrus can never be replaced. <3

[Collider]

Pacifien wrote...

I am curious if the developers will really take all possible suicide mission outcomes into account (aside from the one where Shepard is dead) when developing ME3. Because in that sense, Garrus could very well not be available. A great many squadmates could not be available, and Shepard might need to get a few replacements.
And before some cries out "no more recruiting!" this scenario would only apply to those who imported a suicide mission outcome with deaths. If you import a perfect run, you could very well have no reason to recruit anyone else.
And before someone says other players should be punished if they got anyone on the suicide mission killed, they're not taking into account that 1) people outside of this forum who don't have a million suicide mission guides to look at could very well have squadmates dead unintentionally and not on purpose, 2) you don't give players a choice, tote your game is about choices, then turn around and punish the player for making "bad" choices, and 3) that they're possibly taking it too seriously.
Still, why recruit Gavorn if Lorik Qui'in is a perfectly better replacement?

Making new squad mates just for those who had squad mates die - meaning if Garrus died you'd get Gavorn or something - is an astounding waste of resources. And if you have squad mates killed, you should face the consequences of that - Bioware did not advertise just the choice aspect of these games, they also advertised the consequence aspect. It's very easy to reload and replay the suicide mission, or go on google for 5 seconds and find a suicide mission guide. And those who kill squad mates intentionally, as I said, should have to face the consequences of doing so.Whether it was a "bad" decision or not is up to the player - surely if they killed squad mates ON PURPOSE they might not think it was a such a bad idea.

[Lemonwizard]

The simple fact of the matter is, as far as getting squadmates killed, is that unless you're intentionally trying to get people killed, or you skipped a bunch of loyalty missions/upgrades, or were a complete idiot about choosing who does what in the suicide mission, there is no way you'd have more than like 3 or 4 people die. First time I played through the game with no guide, I lost grunt as the distraction team leader because I figured "well what could be more distracting than a big angry krogan", and that was it. Next time around I picked a leader person, got the no one left behind achievement, and it was easy.


Even if in addition to picking the wrong distraction team leader people got fooled into Miranda's any biotic could handle it idea on the shield part or took Jacob up on the volunteer option, and then took grunt and garrus to the terminator without ever downloading Zaeed....that's only 4 deaths with everybody loyal.



Ruling out the DLC characters, how many people have you got left? 6. Which was the size of the party in the first game.




You would not be able to get enough people killed to have a party too small to be viable for ME3 unless you were being hasty and reckless with your choices, or you were trying on purpose to get squaddies killed. And I don't see anything wrong with punishing decisions to not bother preparing for the suicide mission or get squadmates killed on purpose. People always complain the choices don't have enough consequences, well here's a consequence right here that you can have.