Aller au contenu

Photo

Dragon Age 2.. What would you like to see changed ??


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
128 réponses à ce sujet

#51
SOLID_EVEREST

SOLID_EVEREST
  • Members
  • 1 624 messages
I think they could make the game more challenging and way better if they put some sort of morale system. A morale scale could determine how hard your team hits/hitpoints they have, and could raise/lower at any time. I saw lots of ambushes in DA, which could've been even more effective if they put a morale system or something like that. I would like anything that would make the combat system better because that was one of the game's main setbacks. If your team's morale is too low, you would have to go back to camp to restart the scale, and that would also make camp more of a necessity. The champion spec/flanking is practically built for a system like this...

#52
AT_Field

AT_Field
  • Members
  • 32 messages
bioware should use the ue3 engine like they did with mass effect because goddamn, eclipse is awful. i don't think i've ever played a game that crashes and memory leaks more than this.

Modifié par AT_Field, 02 juin 2010 - 04:51 .


#53
Reznik23

Reznik23
  • Members
  • 212 messages
I'd also like to see some new weapons, other than the standard RPG/fantasy stuff.

How about some polearms for example? Warriors and mages could have the option of pikes or halberds, say. Perhaps an arcane warrior mage could have a glaive or naginata that would double as a magic staff and a melee weapon in one?

#54
Astranagant

Astranagant
  • Members
  • 464 messages
Forge/craft your own weapons and armor and customize the built-in enchantments yourself. So that I can make a sword that gives +300% critical/backstab damage.

#55
Hollingdale

Hollingdale
  • Members
  • 362 messages

Astranagant wrote...

Forge/craft your own weapons and armor and customize the built-in enchantments yourself. So that I can make a sword that gives +300% critical/backstab damage.


We have a winner! You may close the thread now mods.

#56
Maleficent

Maleficent
  • Members
  • 195 messages
Bioware have announced a new DA but may not be calling it 2.They've officially said that the first thing their redoing is the graphics other than that not much info february 1st 2011 US and 4th february 2011 for europe.I would like to knock out this dlc bull if the best armour a rogue can wear is from a dlc why why why.Just take the time to finish the game properly.There isn't much wrong with Origins maybe more consequences for your actions leading to a more diverse experience(as mentioned above).keep the conversation system just more options and yes the let us hear the main character's voice.One thing that i really want is a quick change armour like the weapon set change (xbox player here).More classes and races.Keep traps as are and make crafting more rewarding even adding in a hard number scale.More on the fly party commands ie. Instead of all party hold position do it individually,pairs or however you like.More diversive environments walk in water at least not important but invisble wall is eeeeuw! bigger cities ,bigger game, slight tweaks more tweaks and even more tweaks that's all it needs.btw I think DA:Origins is the start of something bigger and greater for bioware mass effect is just not as engaing its dull by comparison.:wizard:

#57
XD-REREDRUM-XD

XD-REREDRUM-XD
  • Members
  • 17 messages
Look
Its Dragon age 2 which means that it is based at a similar time to your previous character so chances are you will be able to import your character or the chantry may of gotten bored with naming every 100years as a different age (unlikely if you ask me).
if it is based at the time of your character then another blight is unlikely unless if its in a totally different place.(REMOVED DUE TO ACCIDENTAL SPOILER)

If they put multiplayer in with DA2, yes it would be a nice addon however it would take forever to do and what would happen if the healer lagged just as the rest of the party needed healing so they all die? so i do not think they will include multiplayer.

if they make DA2 an open world, i think that would be fairly good, i dont care if it will affect the graphics all i want is better gameplay.

Modifié par XD-REREDRUM-XD, 06 juin 2010 - 08:05 .


#58
Giggles_Manically

Giggles_Manically
  • Members
  • 13 708 messages
Have more weapon skills:

Staves

Light 2 hander (Katana)

More of a dueling way of using a sheild.



Better yet have forms of combat to change up your styles, like a Heavy mode for sword and sheild, or a style where you use the sheild like another weapon.

#59
XD-REREDRUM-XD

XD-REREDRUM-XD
  • Members
  • 17 messages
What i would like to see in DA2 are:
1)- the choices made from DA:O really do come back to haunt you, (REMOVED DUE TO ACCIDENTAL SPOILER)

2)- More spells/attack abilities. I just got bored with just basically playing arcane mage+healer and spamming a few electric spells.

3)- Mounts! if you could get horses or giant deepstalkers and attack from them that would be mint!

4)- Keep it easy to Mod! there were so many great mods and DLC that made this game better.

5)- More types of weapons/armour with different stats. I just got bored with the juggernaut/ cailans armour and feeling indestructable in them. if they made it so leather armour could run faster so rogues could keep trying to get behind you could pose more of a challenge.

6)- More MASSIVE battles! and perhaps make it so that not nearly everything got one hit KOed when you have been fighting them all throughout the game were they got stronger and stronger

Modifié par XD-REREDRUM-XD, 06 juin 2010 - 08:05 .


#60
250poundbeefcake

250poundbeefcake
  • Members
  • 39 messages
- Less Darkspawn, more variety in regular enemies.



- If they're going to make normal as easy as it was in DA:O, they need to make Nightmare difficulty nightmarish. Coming from the Baldur's Gate saga, everything in this game was so very easy, and really took away some of the fun.



-More cities! Or Larger cities at least. Or maybe one gigantic city. Would love to see an entirely new location such as Antiva.



-Some free roam locations completely unrelated to the main story where you can do some sidequests.




#61
Hollingdale

Hollingdale
  • Members
  • 362 messages
Personally I want the darkspawn to actually be terrifying which they'll never be if you can slay them like any trash.



They should be A LOT stronger than your average enemies and be encountered more rarely.

#62
Vicious

Vicious
  • Members
  • 3 221 messages

They should be A LOT stronger than your average enemies and be encountered more rarely.




Agreed. In my first playthrough after I mowed down the Darkspawn in the Korcari Wilds, I felt they didn't deserve their fearsome reputation.



So after that I knocked the difficulty up to 'Nightmare' every time I squared off against Darkspawn, and 'Normal' when facing everything else.



It felt right.

#63
Brockololly

Brockololly
  • Members
  • 9 030 messages

Vicious wrote...


They should be A LOT stronger than your average enemies and be encountered more rarely.


Agreed. In my first playthrough after I mowed down the Darkspawn in the Korcari Wilds, I felt they didn't deserve their fearsome reputation.

So after that I knocked the difficulty up to 'Nightmare' every time I squared off against Darkspawn, and 'Normal' when facing everything else.

It felt right.


The fact that you're a Warden during a Blight no less made it ok to me that the darkspawn were rather plentiful. But at least in the Deep Roads which is basically the home turf for the darkspawn, yeah, there the odds should be tipped against the PC a bit more.

#64
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 698 messages

Hollingdale wrote...

Personally I want the darkspawn to actually be terrifying which they'll never be if you can slay them like any trash.

They should be A LOT stronger than your average enemies and be encountered more rarely.


If you're fighting darkspawn rarely, what are you doing the rest of the time?

#65
Fntsybks

Fntsybks
  • Members
  • 96 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

Hollingdale wrote...

Personally I want the darkspawn to actually be terrifying which they'll never be if you can slay them like any trash.

They should be A LOT stronger than your average enemies and be encountered more rarely.


If you're fighting darkspawn rarely, what are you doing the rest of the time?


DAO was during the Blight, and you don't fight darkspawn in most of the origins, the elven quest, Redcliffe, Haven, Magi quest, or anything in Denerim. In a non-Blight sequel, it would make sense to rarely, if ever, fight darkspawn and instead square off against humans/qunari/demons/undead/werewolves/whatever DA2 focuses on. Of course, I would like to see at least some darkspawn in the sequel, but not have the sequel focus on them.

As to darkspawn being too powerful, the simple explanation is that being a Warden helps you fight them, so that's at least one argument. But yes, I would like the darkspawn to live up to their reputation, although remember that few humans have ever seen darkspawn, and so human beliefs about darkspawn and their fighting abilities aren't very reliable.

#66
Arrtis

Arrtis
  • Members
  • 3 679 messages

250poundbeefcake wrote...

- Less Darkspawn, more variety in regular enemies.



i think there was a variety.
spiders- a variety of different colors and shapes
bears- not as much variety as spiders but they arent all the same
dogs- no real variety here
wolves- same ol wolves
zombies- they have maybe 2 models
shades- no variety
demons- you got your rage demons desire demons sloth demons and pride demons
spirits- spirit of valor you can kill and wisps cant think of anymore
warriors-elven dwarfs and humans
magi- ditto
rogues- only elves and humans
abominations-no variety
then darkspawn- you got your hurlocks genlocks ogres and shrieks with a few different models for some of them.
None of them are really memorable imo but they put in quite a bit.:wizard:
Well i think it wouldnt hurt to put in more.

#67
yorktonboy

yorktonboy
  • Members
  • 8 messages
more diverse areas or landscapes or if need be shorten the length of the ares.. Crawling through the deeps roads forever each playthrough is a tad annoying. A 40-60 hour game shouldn't be divided into 5 main areas.

#68
TheDarkHuntress

TheDarkHuntress
  • Members
  • 116 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

Hollingdale wrote...

Personally I want the darkspawn to actually be terrifying which they'll never be if you can slay them like any trash.

They should be A LOT stronger than your average enemies and be encountered more rarely.


If you're fighting darkspawn rarely, what are you doing the rest of the time?


That's why we need more romance.

#69
SchaerMann30

SchaerMann30
  • Members
  • 194 messages
I want something simple, elegant and likely truly difficult to pull off. Give us more of a true 'shades-of-grey' game. Make at least a few choices not be necessarily good or bad (DA:O did take steps in the right direction, but more needs doing), but make choices that need to be made by the PC between two bad things of fairly equal stature. That kind of choice can stick with you but hard, and makes a game just that much more intriguing.

No game has really done a good job with this sort of thing yet, but as a gaming culture we're working toward it. I'd like to see the next Dragon Age feature this sort of gut-wrenching, "I have two choices. Both are terrible, but I have to pick one or the other, knowing that someone is going to come out short. What do I do?!?" kind of moment at least once. I love DA:O, so far my favorite RPG ever, but I felt cheated in some places by being able to avoid that heart-searing experience which should have been present in the situation (The end-stage of Orzammar in particular) through an absurdity in plot.

Better combat mechanics would be good, but isn't critical; I'm familiar with the mechanics currently used, and too much change would end up with things getting confused when I try to switch back and forth between games. The engine itself is fine; it fits the setting, although I would recommend they optimize it for Dragon Age 2.

Beyond that, I'm a fairly happy camper.

#70
ObserverStatus

ObserverStatus
  • Members
  • 19 046 messages
If they cut back on the vendor trash we have to sell, that would be nice.

#71
Chanegade

Chanegade
  • Members
  • 136 messages
Cooler hats and helmets. Like a Gandalf pointy hat for a Mage :D


#72
ObserverStatus

ObserverStatus
  • Members
  • 19 046 messages
ya, rly I'm tired of the bonnets mages have to wear now.

#73
SchaerMann30

SchaerMann30
  • Members
  • 194 messages
Did nobody aside from BioWare and a few medieval enthusiasts look at those outfits, costumes (NOT talking about armor, especially for females) and footwear and realize that everything was actually period-correct, and thrown into a fantasy setting? People complain how similar all of the leather armor looks; has anyone actually *looked* at a suit of leather armor closely to compare? BioWare did a bloody good job. Leathers pretty well always looked the same. They didn't really do much for dyeing; they just tanned it, shaped it to the wearer and out the door it went. Footwear and headgear is the same; yes, it looks odd to our modern eyes, but most hoods and hats in the medieval period actually looked like someone was wearing a sack on their head. Apologies to those who thought differently, but there you go; a history lesson to go with your BioWare game. They did a spectacular job of bringing medieval European life into a fantasy setting of their own creation, with accurate details except for little things like female body strangeness and the armor for women being a bit odd... especially if you consider how equal women are treated with regard to taking up arms in defense of King and country, and nobody says a word.

Not exactly standard, even for the most enlightened of European nations in the period, but it's a modern BioWare game, and I understand and can agree with their reasoning.

However, the weapons... I'd like to get BioWare to talk to someone who actually knows weapons of the era. The weapons used in DA:O just tend to freak me out; they're not viable for combat in so many ways, and it's rather alarming that they let the weapons go like that when they did so well depicting nearly every other piece of equipment.

#74
Hollingdale

Hollingdale
  • Members
  • 362 messages

AlanC9 wrote...

Hollingdale wrote...

Personally I want the darkspawn to actually be terrifying which they'll never be if you can slay them like any trash.

They should be A LOT stronger than your average enemies and be encountered more rarely.


If you're fighting darkspawn rarely, what are you doing the rest of the time?


Using up condoms (pig intestine-style :devil:)!

Seriously though, I hope Dragon Age 2 wont revolve around a blight, because it's a poor plot mechanic since it rushes the story along and leaves little to no logical room for quests that may stray from the direct threat of the impending darkspawn horde. Nonetheless despite Origins revolving around a blight there lots of battles not fought against actual Darkspawn (bandits demons crazy dragon people, dragons, etc). There were even entire areas completely devoid of Darkspawn.

Now with a more intelligent and less stressed plot the Darkspawn need not necessarily the the antagonists of the majority of the games battles but can instead appear rarely as exceedingly difficult encounter so that their fierceness might actually be recognized and feared as is fitting for a true menace. They should not die just as easy as common bandits.

The fact that you can actually go straight from that stupid village where you get Sten to Orzammar and down into the deep roads too slaughter half the horde is kinda ridiculous. Indeed such an act should not be possible and if Bioware still feel inclined (as is likely)  to have another such dungeon crawl in Dragon Age 2 then I can hope that they place it late in the game when the player has gained considerable power making it less stupid.

Modifié par Hollingdale, 07 juin 2010 - 10:34 .


#75
Giggles_Manically

Giggles_Manically
  • Members
  • 13 708 messages
@ Hollingdale



Posted Image