616 réponses à ce sujet

[SSV Enterprise]

Kalfear wrote...

Thanks for proving my point SSV.

You would think some people would be actually embarressed to answer in a way that I said they would before they did!

And you say your literate

Make that two asses!

[Spartas Husky]

at 1...ata 2....ata 1 2 3 4....dun....dun dun.......dun dun dun.



We gona be Y M C A cha cha cha YMCA....



....random thing there.

[Chuvvy]

SSV Enterprise wrote...

Kalfear wrote...

Thanks for proving my point SSV.

You would think some people would be actually embarressed to answer in a way that I said they would before they did!

And you say your literate

Make that two asses!

Modifié par Slidell505, 01 juin 2010 - 04:28 .

[lukandroll]

Kalfear wrote...

SSV Enterprise wrote...

Wow, two people with different views on what defines an RPG, both arguing against me.

Also, I disagree with the notion that the reviewers were somehow bribed into giving Mass Effect 2 a dishonestly good score.  Why?  Dante's Inferno.  EA was just as willing to spend money promoting Dante's Inferno as they were with Mass Effect 2- Dante's Inferno got a Superbowl commercial while Mass Effect 2 got a commercial during the NFC championship.  However, Dante's Inferno got moderately good reviews at best.  If EA was bribing critics, why didn't Dante's Inferno get a better score?

Spartas Husky:  Through upgrades, your damage can be improved from the beginning of the game to the end.  The system could be improved, but it's there, and IMHO it is better than arbitrarily increasing damage through assigning skill points.

First off, anyone thats been following any games knows about the pre release bribes. Its not just Bioware here so you kinda have nothing to stand on regading that!

Usually someone mouths off "Prove it" which of course no one can but its well known to be happening and a few industry insiders have come out and admitting it in the past.

So ignoring that giant elephant!

If the reveiws were not fake and bought, how exactly do you explain that every reveiw before release was a 9 or higher but every reveiw after release (those that had to buy copies to reveiw, not on the freebie bandwagon) ranked it with 6, 7, 8s? Im not aware of one (not one) post reveiw that gave it the all so common 9.5 - 10 rating that was going on pre release.

How you explain that?

Game suddenly get worse after release or perhaps those not being paid by EA for their reveiws the more balanced and legit reveiw.

To be fair, no reveiw pre or post bashed the game outright so im not saying this some travesty of the ages. Just ALOT of faults that were mimiced by the majority of posters for the first month after release on this very web forum were over looked in the pre release reveiws and mentioned in the post release reveiws.

Im all ears on how a game suddenly got worse because you had to pay for it.

This is interesting... I always wondered how come the early reviews never mentioned all the flaws I experienced on ME2... Interesting indeed...

Anyway, that RPG chart being a joke or not is rather accurate

[Shotokanguy]

Kalfear wrote...

naaa, just a cyber troll looking for a reaction, his lose!

Everything I wrote is dead on the money and actually very free of elitism.

I can be elitist if I want but Shoto would go cry if I was.

PS: He probably objects to me paying taxes as hes probably 10 years away from having to do that!

You may be 10 years ahead of me in paying taxes, but you're 10 years behind me in grammar, apparently.

[Spartas Husky]

Slidell505 wrote...

SSV Enterprise wrote...

Kalfear wrote...

Thanks for proving my point SSV.

You would think some people would be actually embarressed to answer in a way that I said they would before they did!

And you say your literate

Make that two asses!

......5 asses???

[Massadonious1]

Don't mind Kalfear, he's our resident concern troll/conspiracy theorist. He thinks all ME2 reviews were bought, even user based ones at sites like GameSpot and GameFly.

[Sigma Tauri]

Massadonious1 wrote...

Don't mind Kalfear, he's our resident concern troll/conspiracy theorist. He thinks all ME2 reviews were bought, even user based ones at sites like GameSpot and GameFly.

What?! I wish his conspiracies were true. I'd rather be paid large sums of money publicly and shamelessly adulating ME2 than just to freely spout out my views on this forum.

[SSV Enterprise]

Some people just can't deal with the fact that others who are just as intelligent as they are can actually have differing opinions.

Modifié par SSV Enterprise, 01 juin 2010 - 04:51 .

[SSV Enterprise]

And which opinions are more on point is only your opinion as well. :-)

[Sigma Tauri]

slimgrin wrote...

SSV Enterprise wrote...

Some people just can't deal with the fact that others who are just as intelligent and they are can actually have differing opinions.

You get nowhere with relativism. Some opinions are more on point than others.

It's not about relativism. It's about pathological fanaticism, to the point of being willfully ignorant of another's opinion and resorting to attacks on the individual.

[SSV Enterprise]

I enjoy expressing my opinion and discussing reasons for holding different opinions with others.

Modifié par SSV Enterprise, 01 juin 2010 - 04:57 .

[KalosCast]

SSV Enterprise wrote...

I enjoy expressing my opinion and discussing reasons for holding different opinions with others.

NO YOU NEED TO BE ANGRY ABOUT YOUR OPINION AND TRY TO CONVINCE EVERYONE THAT THEY'RE WRONG AND SCUM OTHERWISE YOU'RE JUST A COMMUNIST PIECE OF ****

NO PUNCTUATION EITHER

[KitsuneRommel]

Spartas Husky wrote...

...hehe "relatively realistically" speaking. If your privately funded wouldn't it be "relatively realistic" that you start with everything maxed out???

I mean if I am a spec ops off the save the galaxy it would "relatively realistic" that I am to be given the best armor and weapons available from the very beginning...."relatively realistically" speaking.

Sort of defeats the sense of being part of "relatively realistic" Special Operations, privately funding, elite military group.

"Better funded, of course. Didn't have to buy our own weapons,"
- Mordin Solus talking about the STG

[Spartas Husky]

KitsuneRommel wrote...

Spartas Husky wrote...

...hehe "relatively realistically" speaking. If your privately funded wouldn't it be "relatively realistic" that you start with everything maxed out???

I mean if I am a spec ops off the save the galaxy it would "relatively realistic" that I am to be given the best armor and weapons available from the very beginning...."relatively realistically" speaking.

Sort of defeats the sense of being part of "relatively realistic" Special Operations, privately funding, elite military group.

"Better funded, of course. Didn't have to buy our own weapons,"
- Mordin Solus talking about the STG

amen bro, amen

[LostHH]

Not enough RPG but there was enough shooting to distract me from that

[lovgreno]

More RPG please.

[jack253]

ME was pretty nice in that they put a reasonable balance between shooter and RPG, but both had issues. in ME2 they improved this but unfortunately spend more time improving the shooting element and not so much the rpg elements. for ME3 I say keep the shooting elements of ME2 and just focus on improving the rpg and ME3 will be what it deserves to be: EPIC

[Spartas Husky]

here, instead of going way shooter, how about BIoware does something a bit more productive than just shock and awe and make teams of 4 people.....would be awesome tot ake Tali garrus and future krogan at once.....just awesome.

[Jestina]

ME2 equals less for your money than ME1, that's what it comes down to.

[KitsuneRommel]

Spartas Husky wrote...

here, instead of going way shooter, how about BIoware does something a bit more productive than just shock and awe and make teams of 4 people.....would be awesome tot ake Tali garrus and future krogan at once.....just awesome.

Isometric, turn-based (or real-time with pausing) combat with 5-6 people in your squad. Can I get a 'Yay' vote?

[Spartas Husky]

5-6 people???/ wow wo, too many too many....



I just said 4 in team including Sheppherd.



wait...is MAss effect turn based??? confused now lol

[KitsuneRommel]

Spartas Husky wrote...

5-6 people???/ wow wo, too many too many....

I just said 4 in team including Sheppherd.

wait...is MAss effect turn based??? confused now lol

Go back to the RPG roots.