Casuist wrote...
"I have to say that this statement is incredibly stupid to make...."
hang on...did I resort to ad hominem?
Perhaps, but you know if someone is going to make ridiculous statements, expect them to be called ridiculous. If you wish to have your comments be taken seriously then you have to admit that you'd have to resort to common sense. If you are wondering why I would label it common sense, then you must realise that:
a) Cerberus is a 'secret' organisation.
c) Secret organisations wouldn't publicise their results on account of them being secret!
Also, just in case you're in danger of assuming that I speak for mosor (to whom you were having a discussion with) then I assure you (for whatever that's worth) that I am not.
I didn't actually call you personally stupid though, it's one of those 'clever' bastardly tricks where people read between the lines. It's like saying: "Only intelligent people vote for George W. Bush," which of course implies that people who didn't vote for George W. Bush aren't intelligent.
However, to be fair, it isn't you who is the only one who has made this comment, others have as well. However, not many people accept this rebuttal (for some reason) so it does become rather tiring to hear someone trumpet it for the hundred and thirtieth time. The whole nature of Cerberus still existing seems to me to strongly imply that Cerberus has more successes than failures on the account that people still supply the organisations with funding.
But you know what, consider yourself that you've won because it seems like the same arguments are going to be made on both sides till the end of the franchise and honestly I lack the same patience and enthusiasm to make those same rebuttals.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




