[quote]UNAVAILABLE wrote...
[quote]
You're running in fear from the enemy!
[/quote]
Considering that destroying the (assumed) base was the original objective of the mission, it's interesting that you would call completing that objective "running in fear from the enemy". Perhaps you could explain that logic.
[/quote]That is not an argument. Mission objectives can change at any time, any competent leader would be able to adapt.
[quote]UNAVAILABLE wrote...
[quote]
You're scared of the reapers, so you prefer to cut and run rather than grow some hair on your balls and learn.
[/quote]
And you're willing to treat your scientific community like front line troops that are easily sacrificed and replaced.[/quote]Don't make such assumptions. Risk is a part of life, and in this case, when faced with extinction, the risk is necessary. Just because someone thinks studying the base is a necessary risk, doesn't mean that person thinks the people doing the studying are easily sacrificed and replaced.
[quote]UNAVAILABLE wrote...
[quote]
Having more information and tech they intended us to possess is probably the best way to beat the reapers.
[/quote]
I'm not arguing against that. I'm arguing that the base doesn't necessarily represent the best way for that to happen.
[/quote]Until a better way surfaces, you have to work with what you've got.
In my opinion it is riskier to destroy the base without knowing you have some other way to deal with the reapers (even then, that isn't cool since you need a plan

.
[quote]UNAVAILABLE wrote...
[quote]
Sure, it was on the citadel end, but whose to say it was on the ilos end initially as well. Maybe it wasn't fully functional yet. As for the large planet and research facility, it doesn't mean they had everything they needed on planet at that time. You're also forgetting there were only 12 of them. No support staff. I call that limited resources.
[/quote]
So essentially you are arguing that because those scientists worked under adverse conditions we should ignore the fact that successful study of Reaper tech took them decades. Fine. What of the fact that Asari and Salarians have been studying mass relays and the Citadel for centuries to little or no avail? Past experience shows that the time scale required to study Reaper tech is simply too great to be of practical use in the current war.
[/quote]I think it is logical to say that the mass relays, along with the Citadel, were designed to be difficult to research. However, your example is not applicable in this case, because there is a difference between studying mass relays and being given a factory that builds mass relays.
[quote]UNAVAILABLE wrote...
[quote]
It's not unfounded. You're also assuming every human scientist in the galaxy will be at the collector base. Please. Maybe a small team and support staff, like they had in the derelict reaper.
[/quote]
No, I'm assuming the best and smartest scientists will be there. And considering how much larger this place is than the derelict Reaper and the increased urgency of the research I would expect the number of people involved to be substantially greater. Just how many Einstein level genius people do you think exist in the galaxy at any one time? How many can you afford to lose in a gamble?
[/quote]You seem to be assuming TIM would put all his eggs in one basket, assuming that Cerberus is going to be doing the bulk of the research and development. You also seem to be assuming that research needs to be done on the collector base. I can't imagine it being difficult to download schematics on reapers and their technology from the base's computers and then having their best scientists research and test from the safety of hidden Cerberus stations/bases.
[quote]UNAVAILABLE wrote...
[quote]
Did you even for a second consider that these nanobots have the possibility to work in reverse and disassemble a reaper?
[/quote]
Congratulations, that is the first convincing idea of a potentially useful tech gain that I've read on this thread. My concern would be that Reapers created from different base creatures have physiological differences that go beyond the Reaper's appearance. I wouldn't want to invest too much time developing a weapon that works perfectly against human Reapers (of which there are now presumably, none) but fails utterly against the sentient shrimp. If the derelict Reaper were still around, and testing was a possibility, I might feel differently.[/quote]It doesn't matter how different the reapers are, they'll still die if you blow them up. Nanobots could possibly just disassemble whatever materials they encounter, be it metal or organic. You do have a point though, that the differences in the reapers might be an important factor depending on what kind of weapon you're using.
[quote]UNAVAILABLE wrote...
So ultimately, we come back to the earlier point of "do the potential risks outweigh the potential benefits"?
I still feel that they do. I consider gains from the Base to be a long shot with a high potential for negative backlash.
But, for a renegade character who doesn't care how big the pile of innocents is as long as the mission gets accomplished, I can see it's a choice that has some merit.[/quote]
I don't look at it from the same perspective. As someone who kept the base, I had two choices: give the base to TIM and hope his efforts bear gains that outweigh any losses due to his methods, or blow up the base without knowing if we'll ever find anything else that could possibly give us an edge against the reapers.
[quote]UNAVAILABLE wrote...
[quote]
Hell even if we don't get anything technologically, we may get usefull intelligence on their plan of attack.
[/quote]
If Harbinger didn't think to format the data disks before bailing, he deserves to lose.[/quote]I'm sure he thought of it, but was he able to?