Aller au contenu

Photo

Why do people destroy the Collector base?


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
3478 réponses à ce sujet

#401
Christmas Ape

Christmas Ape
  • Members
  • 1 665 messages

MaaZeus wrote...
What I am saying is that Genophage was not the major mistake, it was only least bad solution to a situation that was out of hand and it letted Krogan atleast live. This all came from councils mistake of giving Krogan the technology instead of letting them evolve themselves and probaply learn to use it responsibly on their own with their cultures own terms. THIS was the big mistake of Council in Rachni wars that led to quite a bit of misery.

So we're agreed, then; all things considered, the Council has a much more robust history of atrocities on outsider species than Cerberus does.

Remember: Every Cerberus experiment Shepard cleans up in the Terminus Systems, taken together, killed less innocent humans than the turians at Shanxi.

#402
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
Trusting that Cerberus' interactions with the base will produce more good than bad seems rather idealistic to me.

#403
STG

STG
  • Members
  • 831 messages
Posted Image

#404
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages

Shandepared wrote...

MaaZeus wrote...


Perhaps. But because of this I strive for good in all situations, and this is not a flaw.


It is if you fail to ever achieve anything meaningful. Idealists are often pawns of more savvy people.



...if they do not realise that they are being pawns. Idealism does not equal to weak will and short sightnedness.

#405
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages

Collider wrote...

Trusting that Cerberus' interactions with the base will produce more good than bad seems rather idealistic to me.



No thats just being naive for believing Cerberus's supposedly good intentions without questions.

#406
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

MaaZeus wrote...

...if they do not realise that they are being pawns. Idealism does not equal to weak will and short sightnedness.


It equals blindness and an accute lack of understanding for how the universe works.

#407
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages

Shandepared wrote...

MaaZeus wrote...

...if they do not realise that they are being pawns. Idealism does not equal to weak will and short sightnedness.


It equals blindness and an accute lack of understanding for how the universe works.



No, thats just being stupid.

#408
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

MaaZeus wrote...

No, thats just being stupid.


Being an idealist, in other words.

#409
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages

Shandepared wrote...

MaaZeus wrote...

No, thats just being stupid.


Being an idealist, in other words.


If you equal idealist to person who is self righteous blind twit with big aims, then yes. But this is not exactly what I am thinking.

Modifié par MaaZeus, 08 juin 2010 - 01:23 .


#410
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

MaaZeus wrote...

If you equal idealist to person who is self righteous blind twit with big aims, then yes.


I've never met one who wasn't. I'm glad we agree.

#411
STG

STG
  • Members
  • 831 messages
Posted Image

#412
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages

STG wrote...

Posted Image


I was thinking about exactly same thing. :D

#413
Markinator_123

Markinator_123
  • Members
  • 773 messages
There is something I am finding wierd. Why are people so willing to place so much trust in the alliance and the council? People say that they will save the base if they had the opportunity to give the base to the alliance or the council? Cerberus has done more for Shepard than any of those two organizations did. Did you people forget that the alliance basically ****** on Shepard's grave tearing apart everything he worked hard for? Besides the council is no better than Cerberus anyway in regards to harsh methods.

#414
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

Markinator_123 wrote...

There is something I am finding wierd. Why are people so willing to place so much trust in the alliance and the council?


Their position isn't exactly complicated: Cerberus is evil.

They then ignore any facts which show that the Council is even worse.

#415
Markinator_123

Markinator_123
  • Members
  • 773 messages
By the way, the main reason people destroy the base is because paragon choices work



in Fiction.

#416
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages

Markinator_123 wrote...

There is something I am finding wierd. Why are people so willing to place so much trust in the alliance and the council? People say that they will save the base if they had the opportunity to give the base to the alliance or the council? Cerberus has done more for Shepard than any of those two organizations did. Did you people forget that the alliance basically ****** on Shepard's grave tearing apart everything he worked hard for?

And why would I trust the base with Cerberus?

Besides the council is no better than Cerberus anyway in regards to harsh methods.

Experimenting on children, thresher maw attacks...yea, I disagree.

#417
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Markinator_123 wrote...

There is something I am finding wierd. Why are people so willing to place so much trust in the alliance and the council?


Their position isn't exactly complicated: Cerberus is evil.

They then ignore any facts which show that the Council is even worse.



A POV thing. Cerberus and Council are both relatively evil. But since I agree more with Councils goals than Cerberus's goals, I see council as far less lesser evil. Cerberus, or TIM precisely, has IMHO evil ideas that are not in balance with rest of the galaxy, where council is evil just because they seem incompetent and made bad decisions and mistakes, but all in all this is because they are politicians and there are bureucratic wheels they need to turn. Councils evil acts have been debated last 3 pages, both attacked and defended.

Modifié par MaaZeus, 08 juin 2010 - 01:43 .


#418
STG

STG
  • Members
  • 831 messages

Markinator_123 wrote...

By the way, the main reason people destroy the base is because paragon choices work

in Fiction.


Why not do it then?

#419
Markinator_123

Markinator_123
  • Members
  • 773 messages

Collider wrote...

Markinator_123 wrote...

There is something I am finding wierd. Why are people so willing to place so much trust in the alliance and the council? People say that they will save the base if they had the opportunity to give the base to the alliance or the council? Cerberus has done more for Shepard than any of those two organizations did. Did you people forget that the alliance basically ****** on Shepard's grave tearing apart everything he worked hard for?

And why would I trust the base with Cerberus?


Besides the council is no better than Cerberus anyway in regards to harsh methods.

Experimenting on children, thresher maw attacks...yea, I disagree.



I am not saying Cerberus isn't evil nor I am saying that they are to be trusted, but people place so much trust in the alliance and the council that you people fail to realize that, just like Cerberus, they will abandon you as soon as it is convenient.

#420
Markinator_123

Markinator_123
  • Members
  • 773 messages

STG wrote...

Markinator_123 wrote...

By the way, the main reason people destroy the base is because paragon choices work

in Fiction.


Why not do it then?



That is the main reason why I destroyed it.

Modifié par Markinator_123, 08 juin 2010 - 02:01 .


#421
Christmas Ape

Christmas Ape
  • Members
  • 1 665 messages
Short form: Afraid of being associated with imaginary racists.



Present Shepard has three very clear if not popular reasons for trusting Cerberus over the Council:

1. She might, some day, understand the Illusive Man. At the least, he's human, and his brain is basically built the same as hers. Familiarity is a powerful thing, even if the person you trust most is a little more...exotic.

2. Miranda was telling you the straight truth. They're humanity's STG, a clandestine organization devoted to the advancement and protection of the species. Where the salarians chose to show the asari their hand, we disavowed we're playing the game at all and quietly filled up on aces. Now who's the genius?

3. Better to have the resources of Cerberus behind you than at your back, if you follow the difference. You've got their top agents and some of the best freelancers in the field aboard the ship you command, whose loyalty (even if you don't test it) is to you - for now you have the discretion to advance the agenda your way. You can put a good face on Cerberus to the rest of the galaxy, and if TIM tries to take away your toys Miranda knows where he lives.

#422
Vaenier

Vaenier
  • Members
  • 2 815 messages
I want Paragons to suffer millions apon millions of losses because they didnt have the Reaper tech to help them. They will be one big happy family, so its not like they care who lives. The Renegades will save countless lives, but be hated for it.

Use your assets like TIM, dont trust them though. You have already destroyed 4? Cerberus facilities, he isnt stupid enough to think you wont do it again.

#423
Sajuro

Sajuro
  • Members
  • 6 871 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Sajuro wrote...
Still I hardly think that domination of Aliens by Cerberus (Since I doubt TIM will allow the Alliance to take control as he'd probably pull something like "I AM HUMANITY!" If shep or anyone calls him out) would be preferable to being wiped out since Cerberus seems to be pretty short sighted in its plans for human Dominance. Also, Racial Superiority (Which the creed of Human Dominance is =p ) has never turned out well for the 'non-superior' race(s).

Just a moment....you think being wiped out - remember, we're talking about our whole species being wiped out for all time - would be preferrable to Cerberus domination? Perhaps then in your games, humanity deserves to be wiped out if this is the prevailing attitude...

Also, racial superiority is not the creed of human dominance. In the ME universe, species act mostly as nations, not as races. Which means that dominance by one species amounts to nothing more than regular empire-building. An ideology of racial superiority may be present or not, but I don't see such an attitude in Cerberus - nowhere in the games do they say non-humans are intrinsically inferior, deserve to be treated as slaves etc.. They just say "our only concern is humanity".

As for what empire-building may result in: look at the successful empires in human history. Sure they all have their history of militarism and occasional oppression, but apart from that, they have been pretty varied. An often-observed phenomenon was a cosmopolitan attitude at the core, a result not of any particular virtue, but of the necessity of having to integrate many different peoples. Why did they do this? Because oppression, while having its place in certain times and places, is not a fruitful global long-term strategy. In other words, there is no indication that a human interstellar empire would be any worse than the Roman or British empires in human history. Not ideal, maybe, but tolerable, and very much preferrable to extinction.

I'd rather die than submit to the control of Cerberus, because even the all human council is moving towards a more oppressive Citadel and  TIM would probably continue tightening Humanity's grip. If TIM simply wanted governmental dominance, he would be pushing for Alliance Dominance as that is Humanity's united government.Cerberus seems to me to be a greatly inflated Terra Firma, though some people (like Kelly) like Aliens as well as humans, most of the people in it operate on the belief that humans are superior to aliens (conversly, aliens are inferior to humans). You'd be surprised how many crimes are committed when it comes to people who are just concerned with the welfare of their own race, and how the people who think other races are inferior tend to rise to the top under such regimes. You might want to ask people in India about how well the british treated them, or the people in Africa how cosmopolitan being carved up into chunks for European empires was. Again, who says that Cerberus is good for the long term? Doing whatever it takes tends to lead to a lot of short term solutions instead of looking for the solution that is best for all involved parties (though that isn't needed since we are only looking for Human dominance). More over, a one race council isn't an effective governing body as it will invariably fail to understand the cultures of the different races that make up citadel space and one man governing from the top will only have a narrower view.
If my humanity can do as much for the race(s) of the next cycle as the protheans did for us by destroying the collector base and leaving clues behind rather than set up a Cerberus dictatorship, then maybe extinction if preferable.

#424
Cyberfrog81

Cyberfrog81
  • Members
  • 1 103 messages
Yesterday I finally, on my 7th playthrough, roleplayed a Shepard that died in the suicide mission. Before dying, she saved the base. TIM's "and beyond" (in his little chat with Joker) creeps me out (seing Joker salute TIM didn't make me feel any better, as it was rather easy to forget that he is Cerberus). Saving humanity through Reaper tech: Great, in theory. Human dominace through Reaper tech... no thanks. Not to mention that Cerberus projects often end in disaster, with plenty of atrocities commited before that. An intact base might allow them to screw up on a larger scale than ever before.

#425
Markinator_123

Markinator_123
  • Members
  • 773 messages

Besides the council is no better than Cerberus anyway in regards to harsh methods.

Experimenting on children, thresher maw attacks...yea, I disagree.



Did you read Mass Effect Revelation? Saren was a sadist and he was the council's best spectre for decades.