Childish Alistair
#1
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:10
Guest_Hanz54321_*
But I'll try again.
On many threads there are a good portion of posters who blame Alistair for essentially being an immature brat and think that it's Alistair's own fault that he either becomes a drunk wanderer, gets beheaded, or is a buttface for getting mad when he has to marry Anora. That his reaction to recruiting . . . that other guy . . . is just unacceptable.
I'd like to point something out about the character of Alistair though. Given his upbringing and his life experiences, aren't his childlike qualities to be expected? How can people give Loghain a pass for his behavioral issue and come down so hard on Al.
My thesis:
Alistair was born, and then banished to the stables. Nobody taught him how to act. Nobody fathered/mothered/mentored him. They just blew him off.
Then Alistair gets shipped to the Chantry. It's pretty traumatic for a child to be thrown out by his surrogate parents, and it screws the child up psychologically. And the Chantry? So he grew up getting his knuckles wrapped and being scolded all the time. Plus all he ever heard about was being good and righteous and pious. He never learned there's a real world outside the Chantry and that world is not black and white.
Now his Templar training: the one bright spot in his adolescent development. He himself said he liked the discipline. Unfortunately the discipline to maintain control in combat doesn't carry over into social situations (I know this first hand). Furthermore, this training encourages more black and white thinking. "Kill evil, help the weak. It's that simple. Oh, and mages are baaaadd, mmm'kaaay?" But it's something positive and it gives Alistair a base to work with.
Finally, Duncan. By the time Duncan gets to him Alistair has been rejected, ignored, and bullied his entire life. Duncan starts to teach Alistair how to behave. A small example is the "sass the mage" lecture - pointing out that politically that was a bad idea. He's learnin the kid. But alas, 6 months is not enough time to undo 20 some years of wrong learning.
So my discussion point is this: with Alistair's childhood and adolescent experiences, isn't it to be expected that he would have bitterness and emotional outburst issues? I think it's a credit to Alistair that he can at least cover his pain with jokes and lightheartedness. Also, with his Chantry upbringing, isn't it expected that he'd believe in black and white, right and wrong, with no concept of grey areas?
I give Alistair's behavior a pass, even when I play my Loghain focused games.
Discussion.
#2
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:15
I also believe that a person's upbringing is not an excuse for the way they act.
#3
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:16
And I don't think anyone's going to argue that Alistair isn't immature and childish when push comes to shove, but if you harden him you can get him to marry Anora after sparing Loghain, though he'll still leave your party. He'll admit that it was the best choice from a reasonable or political standpoint after having time to cool off.
Modifié par Astranagant, 06 juin 2010 - 05:16 .
#4
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:20
http://social.biowar...7/index/2202899
http://social.biowar...6/index/2769303
Not to mention that it comes up every few pages in all the active Loghain discussion threads. Basically, it boils down to a line drawn in the sand, where everyone has already picked their side and aren't gonna change their minds.
#5
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:20
"Childlike" might be too strong a word. But I agree that he was depraved of a normal life and childhood. Then again, so have all other companions or most of them, so we can't always use that as justification.
But to answer your question. No, his decision to leave and abandon the fight did not really surprise me, though it did dissapoint me. And while I can understand his hatred towards Loghain, I can't understand that hatred leading him to forsake Duncan's memory by turning his back on the blight. that's my biggest problem with the issue. That he just leaves. And I personally can't allow him to do that.
#6
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:21
See that guy looks capable, like he's been raised to kill mages, and not some too modern douchebag.
#7
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:28
Is Alistair getting executed his fault? Not really. Eamon forced him up as a candidate and convinced him it was the only way to get Ferelden behind the Wardens. You're the one who didn't make him King or try to stop Anora.On many threads there are a good portion of posters who blame Alistair for essentially being an immature brat and think that it's Alistair's own fault that he either becomes a drunk wanderer, gets beheaded, or is a buttface for getting mad when he has to marry Anora. That his reaction to recruiting . . . that other guy . . . is just unacceptable.
Is him getting upset about marrying Anora unreasonable? No. He doesn't like her at this point and either loves you or has never been in love and never entertained the possibility of a political marriage.
Is him wandering off to become a drunk after getting exiled his fault? Absolutely. He shouldn't have thrown his life away like that just because he was disillusioned with Ferelden.
#8
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:33
Modifié par phaonica, 06 juin 2010 - 05:33 .
#9
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:36
Guest_Hanz54321_*
thegreateski wrote...
I believe that you would get more of a discussion in the Alistair thread.
I also believe that a person's upbringing is not an excuse for the way they act.
You know nothing about human development then. You really think you'd be the same person you are today if you had been taught different values, if you had been born in poverty instead of middle class, or if you had been born rich instead of poor (I don't know your background). Or say you'd been permanently disabled. You don't think you would see the world differently?
That's a fools point of view as black and white as Alistair's views on right and wrong.
Who we are is mostly luck. Where we were born and raised (societal influences) and who we were born too (parent education and genetics).
#10
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:39
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Although Astra - Alistair stated that he was treated like crap at Castle Redcliffe and specifically mentioned sleeping in stables IIRC. He was not coddled by Eamon.
#11
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:41
Many will argue from an emotionally sentemental stand point that i am the one who betrays Allistair by allowing Loghain to live. I am just following the suggestion of the SENIOR warden Rihordan (spelling) who tells you and everyone in the landsmeet there are compelling reasons to keep Loghain alive. Later at Redcliffe Keep he drops the final bomb and this explains his reasoning and rational for keeping Loghain alive. Defeating the blight is a MUST win. In order for that to happen a warden MUST make slay the AD, there is no other solution, so having 4 wardesn to fight the AD is better than 3.
It is some what meta gaming but the betrayal of these 2 characters is so large, that no matter how hard i try to forget it i can not, so rather than be disappointed at the end, FORCED into a course of action i feel will be more detrimental (demon baby), rely on a person of wavering conviction or petty revenge seeking, i just remove or ignore both of these characters and stick with my true friends, the ones who will make no demands, who understand loosing is not an option, who will be there in the end when i need them the most, who are able to place themselves second for the protectiont of others, the real heros and thier names are, Loghain, Leliana, Wynne, Sten, Shale, Dog, Zeveran, and Oghren.
Asai
Modifié par asaiasai, 06 juin 2010 - 05:44 .
#12
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:41
#13
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:42
Hanz54321 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
I believe that you would get more of a discussion in the Alistair thread.
I also believe that a person's upbringing is not an excuse for the way they act.
You know nothing about human development then. You really think you'd be the same person you are today if you had been taught different values, if you had been born in poverty instead of middle class, or if you had been born rich instead of poor (I don't know your background). Or say you'd been permanently disabled. You don't think you would see the world differently?
That's a fools point of view as black and white as Alistair's views on right and wrong.
Who we are is mostly luck. Where we were born and raised (societal influences) and who we were born too (parent education and genetics).
Actually, modern science has found that a significant amount of who you are is genetic.
They've done studies, for example, on identical twins who were seperated at birth and raised by different families, and a startlingly large number of them pursued nearly identical paths in life. One of the most famous examples is a pair of seperated twins who both became firefighters, both married women with a specific appearance, both had extremely similar personality and mannerisms, etc., despite being raised by very different families and under very different circumstances.
If you take a course in Psychology (as a physical/biological science,) you'll hear a lot about it in the Nature/Nurture debate.
Modifié par Astranagant, 06 juin 2010 - 05:44 .
#14
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:54
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Astranagant wrote...
Actually, modern science has found that a significant amount of who you are is genetic.
They've done studies, for example, on identical twins who were seperated at birth and raised by different families, and a startlingly large number of them pursued nearly identical paths in life. One of the most famous examples is a pair of seperated twins who both became firefighters, both married women with a specific appearance, both had extremely similar personality and mannerisms, etc., despite being raised by very different families and under very different circumstances.
Well, while these studies are not the be all end all answer to the nature/nurture debate, the studies you allude to are real and you are correct in this.
The Theirin Genes might be why Alistair didn't grow up to be an angry psychopath. I mean he's childish and a little bitter, but he could have turned out like Zevran.
Zevran is a great example of what you are talking about. Genetically he's actually not a bad guy. But instead of being raised by Templars, he was raised by assassins. Thus, he's a lot nastier than Alistair. But Zevran still knows righht from wrong and still loves and still feels guilt.
So both genetics and upbringing mold a person.
P.S.: I try not to reveal too much about my personal life on forums, so I'll just say only that I've taken more than a psychology course or two.
#15
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:56
Loghain's little outburst if he loses wasn't one of his better moments I'll admit but I don't really feel it was childish. Perhaps that was because of the darkness of the subject matter? Not to mention that he thinks you and Alistair are just like Cailan and are being manipulated by Eamon so he honestly thinks you're going to doom Ferelden. He's wrong but that's not a childish concern.Addai67 wrote...
Alistair's outburst in the Landsmeet when his triggers are pushed are no more childish or emotional than Anora's when hers are pushed, or Loghain's tirade about how no one had spilled blood as he had. The Mary Sue PC syndrome has convinced some that Alistair is an emo wimp and affects people's view of his actions in the Landsmeet.
Anora demands one thing and one thing only: the throne. She may promise support regardless and some might call her a **** for not following through on that but she'll do whatever it takes to try and get it. She feels she is the best for Ferelden and has five years of doing what she and many people (who, keep in mind, also don't care about the elves) feel is a good job so it's not like she has no evidence to back up her claim. Betraying you at the Landsmeet isn't nice but it's hardly childish. Refusing to swear fealty to an untested King who only is on the throne because of a father who never acknowledged him and because you and Eamon like him more than her might be considered childish, I suppose.
Alistair walks away and leaves Ferelden to its fate if you neglect to kill one man. He's really willing to doom the entire country for one man. Yes, I do happen to find that childish to say the least. In fact, that's probably the most positive description I can come up with for that kind of behavior.
I really don't get why you insist on taking any and all forms of criticism of Alistair and turn it into 'oh, they must have a Mary Sue PC who demands that everyone fall into line with them'. How is running away and refusing to stand against the Blight which is his sworn duty as one of three (because he leaves before Loghain even survives the Joining) GW in Ferelden over a personal matter in any way justified?
If he wants to hate me for sparing Loghain, never speak to me again, pretend that he's never been to Ferelden, go become a wandering drunk, go travelling, publicly denounce me, whatever AFTER he does his goddamn duty then that's fine. He can do that and that's perfectly understandable. Before, however? Let's just say that he wasn't the only one to become disillusioned at the Landsmeet.
#16
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 05:59
Addai67 wrote...
Alistair's outburst in the Landsmeet when his triggers are pushed are no more childish or emotional than Anora's when hers are pushed, or Loghain's tirade about how no one had spilled blood as he had.
You are right. They all throw a fit when they don't get their way. I don't blame any of them, really, for their outbursts. But I expected more from Alistair, in that I expected him to trust me, and to come back. (the game doesn't let me look for him, or I would have tried)
Modifié par phaonica, 06 juin 2010 - 06:05 .
#17
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 06:02
Guest_Hanz54321_*
And that, ironically, is partially why my canon character goes with Lohgain and refuses Morrigan.
I let Alistair live out of friendship and tell him this doesn't have to be the end. But he ends it. In my game pretty amicably - but an end nonethe less.
Morrigan fails to see that the Tevinter Dragons were put to prison for a reason. Bringing the soul of one back is just asking for the same trouble the Tevinter Magi got when the Dragons taught them how to get into the Black City in the first place. This kid is going to be Mr. Staypuffed and I will have no part of it. I tell her I love her but she chooses to leave anyway. Not my fault we broke up.
#18
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 06:06
phaonica wrote...
Addai67 wrote...
Alistair's outburst in the Landsmeet when his triggers are pushed are no more childish or emotional than Anora's when hers are pushed, or Loghain's tirade about how no one had spilled blood as he had.
You are right. They all throw a fit when they don't get their way. I don't blame any of them, really, for their outbursts. But I expected more from Alistair, in that I expected him to trust me, and to come back.
Except Loghain and Anora did not abandon their people, nor did they turn their backs to the fight in the process.
#19
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 06:12
Guest_Hanz54321_*
With my canon character he takes the throne with Annoya, rallies my armies per Eamon's comments, and ultimately is a good ruler. So he doesn't abandon the country.
But in all other scenarios he does . . . and you'd think he would've learned by now . . . these are good points.
They also support my earlier thesis that the events that take place in one's life shape behaviour. If he doesn't marry Annoya, he never learns what it is to be a good ruler. Instead he learns to be a drunk or a corpse.
I know that's a "in a video game" example but it is a good one.
#20
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 06:12
Hanz54321 wrote...
Morrigan fails to see that the Tevinter Dragons were put to prison for a reason. Bringing the soul of one back is just asking for the same trouble the Tevinter Magi got when the Dragons taught them how to get into the Black City in the first place. This kid is going to be Mr. Staypuffed and I will have no part of it. I tell her I love her but she chooses to leave anyway. Not my fault we broke up.
I'd honestly never thought about Morrigan's leaving if you refuse the DR, but I can definitely see how that would be a great betrayal if you've romanced her. Since I haven't, yet ... well, I never had any illusions that she was in it for herself, and while our goals were the same, so much the better. I actually haven't refused the DR yet, but I can definitly see how I would be angry that my friend would leave like that.
#21
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 06:14
Neither are Alistair's concerns that a) you are letting the man who destroyed Ferelden's Grey Wardens and outlawed them become one,Sarah1281 wrote...
Loghain's little outburst if he loses wasn't one of his better moments I'll admit but I don't really feel it was childish. Perhaps that was because of the darkness of the subject matter? Not to mention that he thinks you and Alistair are just like Cailan and are being manipulated by Eamon so he honestly thinks you're going to doom Ferelden. He's wrong but that's not a childish concern.
Not only childish, but stupid and irresponsible. Regardless of her feelings about Alistair, when the LM decides for him, her duty is to suck it up and bend the knee. Otherwise she is fomenting continued civil war in a time of Blight and hence playing with the destruction of her country. Her personal feelings get in the way every bit as much as Alistair's do, and the potential consequences are greater. He only leaves when he thinks you are going to have Loghain as his replacement anyway. That's not dooming the country.Refusing to swear fealty to an untested King who only is on the throne because of a father who never acknowledged him and because you and Eamon like him more than her might be considered childish, I suppose.
Because it is not only over a personal matter. See above.I really don't get why you insist on taking any and all forms of criticism of Alistair and turn it into 'oh, they must have a Mary Sue PC who demands that everyone fall into line with them'. How is running away and refusing to stand against the Blight which is his sworn duty as one of three (because he leaves before Loghain even survives the Joining) GW in Ferelden over a personal matter in any way justified?
As far as Loghain's speech, it's not only childish, it is an affront to others in the gallery like Bryland who fought in the rebellion with him. He is desperate, of course, and wants to make one last appeal to the Hero of River Dane, but that is a legacy he himself destroyed.
The Mary Sue syndrome comes into play when people do not see that Alistair has valid points, or that his issue with Duncan is no more irrational than the other outbursts at the Landsmeet, all with great things at stake. People get so used to seeing Alistair as the easy-going sidekick that they do not fairly consider the points he makes. Often you hear that he makes no points at all, and as you're arguing, that his issues are completely personal.
Modifié par Addai67, 06 juin 2010 - 06:14 .
#22
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 06:17
It makes the counter argument look weak. Either Alistair's hatred just clouded him completely from the fact he did not want to abandon Ferelden, at that very moment. Or, and that is more sinister, Alistair never cared about Ferelden and its people in the first place and he only wanted to stay in order to kill Loghain, because his revenge was that important even amidst a Blight. I hope it's not the latter, because that would be a disturbing amount of lust for revenge.
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 06 juin 2010 - 06:21 .
#23
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 06:18
You can argue that Loghain and Anora have been abandoning their people the whole game.KnightofPhoenix wrote...
phaonica wrote...
Addai67 wrote...
Alistair's outburst in the Landsmeet when his triggers are pushed are no more childish or emotional than Anora's when hers are pushed, or Loghain's tirade about how no one had spilled blood as he had.
You are right. They all throw a fit when they don't get their way. I don't blame any of them, really, for their outbursts. But I expected more from Alistair, in that I expected him to trust me, and to come back.
Except Loghain and Anora did not abandon their people, nor did they turn their backs to the fight in the process.
I also explained above, in response to Sarah, how Anora specifically does so at the Landsmeet.
#24
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 06:20
Addai67 wrote...
You can argue that Loghain and Anora have been abandoning their people the whole game.KnightofPhoenix wrote...
phaonica wrote...
Addai67 wrote...
Alistair's outburst in the Landsmeet when his triggers are pushed are no more childish or emotional than Anora's when hers are pushed, or Loghain's tirade about how no one had spilled blood as he had.
You are right. They all throw a fit when they don't get their way. I don't blame any of them, really, for their outbursts. But I expected more from Alistair, in that I expected him to trust me, and to come back.
Except Loghain and Anora did not abandon their people, nor did they turn their backs to the fight in the process.
I also explained above, in response to Sarah, how Anora specifically does so at the Landsmeet.
We've already had that discussion Addai. I am not planing to repeat it so soon.
And no, Loghain and Anora might be seen as leading their people to ruin. But that is not abandoning. The difference may not mean much to you, but it does to me in asserting the worth of each individual.
#25
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Posté 06 juin 2010 - 06:23
Guest_Hanz54321_*
I will say the one thing that never rang true to me about Alistair's practical concerns about Loghain joining the wardens was his fear of the knife in the back. Once a Warden is exposed to the taint, his whole understanding of . . . well . . . EVERYTHING changes.
This is another example too of how an experience (learning the Grey warden's secrets) will change a person (Loghain).
And now I have turned my own thread into a Loghain thread again . . .





Retour en haut




