KnightofPhoenix wrote...
None of them abided by the treaty because they were told to. They all abided after what the PC did for them.
After their internal problems were solved, yes. But they were still following the arrangement made by these treaties, which was to follow the Grey Wardens. In general, not any specific Grey Warden and only them. If these problems were solved by Sandal or the Maker instead of the PC they would still follow the Grey Wardens due to the treaties which obliged them to, not Sandal or the Maker.
Don't get me wrong, i can certainly see why the PC would feel self-entitlement there after all they have done. But i consider it just that, self-entitlement. There is no reason why these groups wouldn't follow any other Grey Warden with the treaties just the same.
No army can have two commanders. And even if they have, one must be below the other in terms of hierarchy.
There can be more than one person with rank of general in the army, it does not mean nor require them both to actively command that army at the same time. And it is better to have two potential generals than one, if just because it ensures there's still someone who can command when the other general falls. Hence allowing one (or both) such general(s) to go together with the commander-in-chief would be pretty reckless.
Not for my PC. He sees it very much like Sten.
I am nto saying you are wrong, your position is valid. But so is mine.
Really? Out of curiosity, does your PC ever allow anyone to command them, then? If they do, does it only end with death of either party, or when that other person relinquish the control granted?
Btw, Sten does quit or try to take command from you when he thinks you're acting stupid. So no, that doesn't seem like the way Sten acts, really.