tmp7704 wrote...
Yes, however it goes back to may initial objection which is, the player is arbitrarily deciding to wave away a valid concern while in another situation they are not doing the same thing even though the concerns in that other situation are actually smaller. There is no logic in such going from one stance to its direct opposite literally within a few minutes. Not with a person who is supposed to kill another Warden simply because they just wouldn't take such risk as possibility of having their secrets revealed.
It's not waving away or ignoring. It's just believing that with Loghain under his watch, he will not be as a potential threat as Alistair going off to God knows where, while he hates you and all those involved in the Landsmeet.
If Loghain is made a Warden, and is being watched closely, he would not be as a potential threat as Alistair going off outside your sight. At least, that's a valid position and I do not see it as illogical.
Furthermore, Loghain demonstrated that he would not betray Ferelden and if you believe his realisation that only you can save it to be sincere, then that is reason enough to trust him. Alsitair on the otherhand has no more reason not to betray you, as he already did.
If leaving is harming enough, wouldn't active attempts to wipe out the Wardens through a trap/betrayal and assasination be even more damning? And is it really enough then for someone like that to simply say "i'm sorry, i was wrong" (when the alternative of doing so is their death) to sway mind of man who has no trouble killing a person merely because he thinks they might reveal Warden secrets? Again, there's little consistency in this. Lot of sudden trust based on very little, coming from person who is supposed to not be trustful. If Alistair said "i'm sorry" as he leaves would that be enough to trust him again and let him live, too?
Loghain was not a Warden when he did those things. Alistair is a Warden.
And no, Alsitair saying sorry right in the middle of deserting obviously won't work. But Alsitair saying sorry after declaring his intentions to desert and saying that he will remain is another situation compeltely.
It's like saying he would forgive someone killing a person while saying sorry when he is doing the deed. Different situations between someone apologising during the deed and after. Loghain's apology could be sincere, and it could not. But Alistair's apology right in the middle of deserting could not be seen as sincere.
And again, this is not my Canon Warden speaking. He did not execute Alsitair for this. But I see this as a perfectly valid position.
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 07 juin 2010 - 01:12 .