The "Nathaniel Needs Love Too!" Thread
#2851
Posté 18 février 2011 - 07:16
#2852
Posté 18 février 2011 - 07:58
I've been keeping that bottled up for a while. *stews and broods*
#2853
Posté 18 février 2011 - 08:03
Yeah, I thought about that comment after the Anders announcement. I think it was his way of saying "I wish." A bit of a lament, if not exactly an apology to Nate fans (because he feeds on our tears as you all well know). With Fenris he said he was glad to do a stoic character, so that might have also been the subtext.Mel_Redux wrote...
Is anyone else pissed off that Gaider teased us by saying he really liked Nathaniel and would have picked him as an LI in Awakening?? And now he's not even a party member?!? WILL HE EVEN SHOW UP AT ALL!??!!?
I've been keeping that bottled up for a while. *stews and broods*
#2854
Posté 18 février 2011 - 08:05
Mel_Redux wrote...
Is anyone else pissed off that Gaider teased us by saying he really liked Nathaniel and would have picked him as an LI in Awakening?? And now he's not even a party member?!? WILL HE EVEN SHOW UP AT ALL!??!!?
I've been keeping that bottled up for a while. *stews and broods*
Oh I totally missed that comment by him. Dammit, I wish I would have known and I could have smacked him at PAX about it.
Nate /will/ be there. It's been confirmed that he makes a cameo. We'll at least get to see him. Though I suppose we can look at it this way too, BECAUSE he isn't a main companion in DA2, perhaps he gets saved from the retcon/personality change stick?
#2855
Posté 18 février 2011 - 08:41
Tasmen wrote...
Mel_Redux wrote...
Is anyone else pissed off that Gaider teased us by saying he really liked Nathaniel and would have picked him as an LI in Awakening?? And now he's not even a party member?!? WILL HE EVEN SHOW UP AT ALL!??!!?
I've been keeping that bottled up for a while. *stews and broods*
Oh I totally missed that comment by him. Dammit, I wish I would have known and I could have smacked him at PAX about it.
Nate /will/ be there. It's been confirmed that he makes a cameo. We'll at least get to see him. Though I suppose we can look at it this way too, BECAUSE he isn't a main companion in DA2, perhaps he gets saved from the retcon/personality change stick?
I suppose
Someone posted somewhere that Bioware has a thing for blondes, I'm starting to agree with that.....
#2856
Posté 18 février 2011 - 08:56
#2857
Posté 18 février 2011 - 08:59
#2858
Posté 18 février 2011 - 09:00
Addai67 wrote...
Yeah I wonder that myself, what they've got against the dark-haired hot men. We get lots of dark haired women but the dark-haired guys get killed off.
It seriously makes me sad. I mean Fenris obviously USED to have dark hair given his eyebrows. Why couldn't they have just left it black? Aren't the lyrium tattoos on his jimmy enough?
#2859
Posté 18 février 2011 - 09:01
Addai67 wrote...
Yeah I wonder that myself, what they've got against the dark-haired hot men. We get lots of dark haired women but the dark-haired guys get killed off.
I hope its just a coincidence and not a trite story telling tool. "Good guys - blonde / bad guys - dark" That would be lazy on their part imho.
Edit - I'm changing my avatar in silent protest. She'll look just as good with brown hair!!!
Edit again - ahh yes, that's much better :innocent:
Modifié par Avilia, 18 février 2011 - 11:26 .
#2860
Posté 18 février 2011 - 09:03
BUT WHATEVER! WRITE A DIFFERENT STORY!!!! *goes back to stewing and brooding*
#2861
Posté 18 février 2011 - 09:06
Mel_Redux wrote...
I'm sure it was because Nathaniel wouldn't really fit into the story, so adding him would be jsut to add him.
BUT WHATEVER! WRITE A DIFFERENT STORY!!!! *goes back to stewing and brooding*
Exactly! Give us a little fan service - if they can give Isabela boobs big enough to overbalance her in combat, they can give us pantless Nate.
#2862
Posté 18 février 2011 - 09:08
Avilia wrote...
Mel_Redux wrote...
I'm sure it was because Nathaniel wouldn't really fit into the story, so adding him would be jsut to add him.
BUT WHATEVER! WRITE A DIFFERENT STORY!!!! *goes back to stewing and brooding*
Exactly! Give us a little fan service - if they can give Isabela boobs big enough to overbalance her in combat, they can give us pantless Nate.
Unfortunately, I think they got confused and gave Isabella BOTH the boobs and the pantlessness instead.
#2863
Posté 18 février 2011 - 09:58
I'm not complainingTasmen wrote...
Unfortunately, I think they got confused and gave Isabella BOTH the boobs and the pantlessness instead.
#2864
Posté 19 février 2011 - 12:06
nodice wrote...
I'm not complainingTasmen wrote...
Unfortunately, I think they got confused and gave Isabella BOTH the boobs and the pantlessness instead.
Hey, out of those four, I'm going after Isabela. XD
#2865
Posté 19 février 2011 - 12:09
#2866
Posté 19 février 2011 - 12:29
#2867
Posté 19 février 2011 - 12:30
Modifié par CmdrShepardsGirl, 19 février 2011 - 12:31 .
#2868
Posté 19 février 2011 - 04:13
#2869
Posté 19 février 2011 - 05:09
Mel_Redux wrote...
Here's my fill for "Thomas". Wanted to bang it out quick this morning while I had some time!
So would lol again!
#2870
Posté 19 février 2011 - 10:13
#2871
Posté 19 février 2011 - 10:18
I'm pretty sure anyway - Nate/hanged - Anders/Templars - Oghren/sent packing - Velanna/Dead or sent packing - Justice/sent packing - Sigrun/sent packing.
It made me chuckle - not sure why. Back to your regularly schedule programs...
Modifié par Avilia, 19 février 2011 - 10:18 .
#2872
Posté 19 février 2011 - 10:20
Addai67 wrote...
Yeah I wonder that myself, what they've got against the dark-haired hot men. We get lots of dark haired women but the dark-haired guys get killed off.
They got nothing against them. Almost all the male love interests were dark-hairded before DAO/DA2. Some people even complained about it, too.
#2873
Posté 21 février 2011 - 07:10
Well, here's a late entry to the "Firsts" one...
Nate's first public levitation:

I don't remember if this was a glitch or what...
#2874
Posté 21 février 2011 - 08:20
Nate levitates with style:D
Modifié par Dunizel, 21 février 2011 - 08:20 .
#2875
Posté 21 février 2011 - 08:50





Retour en haut






