fongiel24 wrote...
Yannkee wrote...
First Miranda is against gratuitous violence (bring miri with you to purgatory she will explicitly say it). Then, even if she doesn't want to admit that it was Cerberus, she doesn't approve the experimentations on Jack. And it's obvious that one of the reason why she approves the destruction of the collector base is that she knows Cerberus would probably perform experimentations on humans.
Miranda working for Cerberus doesn't mean she used the same controversal methods used by some people who work in other cells of the organisation. And if she was in charge of project overlord, she wouldn't let this torture on a human happen.
Miranda's comment on Purgatory is almost impossible to get - on all of my playthroughs the other squadmate always comments. Even if you do get it, all she states is "Interrogation is sometimes necessary, but this is just pointless cruelty". Torture for the purpose of extracting information isn't pointless - the point is to get intelligence you otherwise might not have. It's not always the most reliable means of attaining intelligence, but it remains a viable tool nonetheless. Miranda doesn't even explicitly address torture here. Even if she did, note that she says sometimes necessary, not something to the effect of never justifiable. She objects to the guards beating the prisoner because this is the kind of brute force torture that's rarely effective and in this case is completely unnecessary and possibly counterproductive because the guards aren't working under time constraints. Whatever the guards want to get from the prisoner can probably be attained without the beating.
In all my playthroughs (7) it was always her who commented the scene.
To agree with the necessity of interrogation doesn't mean to agree with the necessity of torture.
Miranda's revulsion at what went on at the Teltin facility can't be used to conclude that Miranda is always opposed to torture. Teltin was a particularly horrific example - the torture of helpless, kidnapped children for no purpose other than to poke their buttons until the researchers got the result they wanted. This isn't comparable to something like torturing an enemy agent for mission critical intelligence. It's not even really comparable to Overlord.
Horrific as Overlord, it was yielding results in an area that could have provided useful technology to combat the geth in the future. Jonathan Archer also wasn't callously torturing children to death and discarding them. What he did to David was unjustifiable, but he did it only as a last resort and under extreme duress due to TIM's deadlines. I agree that if Miranda were in charge, she probably wouldn't resort to Jonathan's methods, but she would continue with less extreme experimentation if she felt the project was viable.
Overlord is not the only project which could provide important advancements for Cerberus. If the Teltin Cerberus cell didn't go rogue, the project could provide powerful Biotics to Cerberus.
Both projects are comparable, and it's totally absurd to think one person could be against what happened to Teltin children and not to David.
But I don't expect someone who think her reaction about the collector base is ooc, to understand this part of her character.
No, I don't understand your interpretation of her character. Just because you choose to interpret Miranda as someone who refuses to ever cross the line into morally grey areas doesn't make it true.
Because your interpretation is true ?
Now you know how I feel every time I see conversations about this in the thread.
The difference between your interpretation and mine is that I don't have OOC issues.
Think about it. Miranda isn't an idiot. She knows that Cerberus does some horrific things in the name of protecting humanity. She knows that TIM probably knows about it and at least tacitly endorses it. Yet she still thinks "humanity couldn't have a better advocate" than TIM. What are the chances a Miranda who's absolutely opposed to the use of torture would speak so glowingly of someone who is willing to go to any lengths to achieve his aims? What are the chances that your conception of Miranda would willingly work for an organization that so readily crosses ethical and moral lines?
Yes, I consider her reaction to the Collector Base to be OOC, but then Miranda is a morally nuanced character. She may be reacting emotionally to the extreme horror of what the Collectors were doing with their human victims. Just because she objects to keeping such an abomination doesn't automatically mean she objects to everything else Cerberus does.
TIM is a manipulator, he manipulates Miranda like he manipulates Shepard. He tells people what they want to know.
Look at Miranda comments when she try to defend Cerberus actions : it's a typical Cerberus propaganda. Miranda is only aware of what other cells did because of TIM's informations.
I don't have problem to consider Miranda being part of Cerberus with my interpretation of the character.
And there is absolutely nothing in the game that prove Miranda involvement in any kind of controversial Cerberus actions.
Of course Miranda is not an idiot, but there is a difference between knowing partial informations about something and facing the truth like she did during Overlord, Jack's loyalty mission, or the suicide mission.
But as long as you consider Miranda as a full renegade and pragmatic person, we'll never agree on this subject.
Modifié par Yannkee, 05 octobre 2010 - 11:27 .