Hey, driveby hi from the Jack thread

Having seen this little "femme fatale" thing, I just thought I'd say that I was always under the impression that it just meant
dangerous woman. Over the years it's become a very ambiguous and nebulous term that is culturally hotwired into this very Bondian image of a woman that uses her sexuality as a weapon; a pitbull posing as a lapdog. Granted, the image goes back a lot further than that, and women have used looks and charm over brawn for centuries to equalise the so-called "gender arms race," but it's the femme fatale born out of pulp fiction we tend to think of first when that term gets tossed out; the female spy, the gangster's moll, the conniving adulteress, the blowsy jazz singer, so on and so forth. Because of that it's a very loaded term.
Taken literally (as in "dangerous woman") I'd say sure, Miranda could be a femme fatale. By that argument though, so could Jack, so could Tali, so could Aria, so could Ashley, so could pretty much everyone but Kelly "Fishfeeder" Chambers! In the other, more culturally-loaded sense, it gets harder to apply to Miri. Sure, she dresses in a fashion that is pretty standard of a Bondian femme fatal. She's smart, too, and capaple of taking care of herself with a variety of weapons. So far so good. She even says that her looks are part of her tailoring to be a perfect female spcimen, something she ranks along with her biotics, physical durability, reaction speeds, etc. so we can construe at least that her appearance can be used as a weapon too. But is she manipulative? I'd say no.
Miranda is a lot of things (she's certainly capable of being dangerous and sexy all at once) but her ability to interact with others emotionally is pretty damn stunted. She's an unassailable ice-queen of sorts; her intellect puts her up on a pedestal almost where other people are hard pushed to keep up and end up falling behind the one thing that can keep pace - her work. The much-argued
LotSB dossier for Miranda paints her to me as a woman that has real difficulties dealing with emotions; she has desires, but can't cope with the baggage or uncertainty of relationships... it's like she tried to figure out the facts of life with a pocket calculator, and understandably got the wrong answer. Like Jacob says, their relationship got "real close, then it got real far apart." Perhaps this was because Jacob couldn't fill in the blanks as it were; sure, he could (and this is gonna sound real blunt, but bear with me) fill a specific need, but to him with that came a need for affection, closeness, tenderness, trust... all things Miranda wasn't willing to share at that point (perhaps because of her natural aloofness, or perhaps because she just wasn't sure
how to then). So the relationship fizzled out. Maybe Jacob never really fully trusted her because of her being so far into Cerberus (he talks about how everyone tries to be The Illusive Man, keeping their cards against their chests and hiding their intentions, while Jacob seems pretty open and plain-speaking on most issues... let's just ignore his inability to chat women up

)? Who knows. Either way, it dried up on them. Her interactions with men on the dating website is clinical and blunter than a sledgehammer (motives aside - I know some people read it as an attempt to get pregnant, but that's another discussion entirely). So blunt it's completely charmless. This to me is a woman that can't charm (or simply doesn't want to). She doesn't display the ability to manipulate anywhere in the game, and in my book a Bondian femme fatale can't just look cute and be deadly; that's a femmebot, something lacks the tentacles to ensnare and manipulate the hero into not noticing her intentions in the itterations of pulp fiction. So based on that, I'd say Miranda really
isn't a femme fatale at all; they're not just a pretty box with a gun inside it, they're a pretty box with a gun inside it that you then pick up, get your fingerprints all over, and then turns out to be the weapon they killed their husband with... oh, is that police sirens I hear?
It's all a matter of semantics, really. If a femme fatale is a dangerous woman (no more, no less), then sure, I'd agree that Miranda ticks the (two) boxes for it. But if a femme fatale is a schemer, a manipulator, and a deadly opponent should you rouse her, she can only tick a few of the boxes required; she has the look, the physical deadliness, but not the psychological arsenal that got Salome the head of John the Baptist, or let Mata Hari steal the secret plans, or let Ruth Wonderly play Sam Spade into almost giving up the Maltese Falcon. If that's what makes a famme fatale, Miranda really can't be one... or at the very least, not a very good one.