Eromenos wrote...
Pacifien wrote...
You know, a character doesn't really have to be defined by his sexuality. He doesn't have to bring sexual innuendo into every conversation. Doesn't have to throw in feeders to see if another guy is interested. He could simply not be interested in pursuing a romantic relationship until the Reapers are on his very doorstep and he has an epiphany that leads him to grab Big Ben Sniper Guy and kiss him passionately before it's all over.
People complain that Shepard is a wooden plank in the games, but the reason why is because it allows great leeway for someone to roleplay the character, filling in the blanks that are never explicitly covered within the game. If you roleplayed Shepard as having no romantic interest in the first two games, it's perfectly reasonable he would be "suddenly" gay in the third game. That is fair.
If you did roleplay Shepard as some hopeless romantic in need of companionship in the first two games, then maybe his sudden turn of interest from the ladies to the men might seem odd. That is the way you chose to roleplay it. There is no wrong way to roleplay.
Why would it be odd if he or she is a switch-hitter? You're making an excuse to defend ME3 in the likely event that it will continue to exclude M/M while expanding on current and past exploitations of F/F.
I think Pacifien was simply stating that the "Consistency" argument has no solid logic and hoes against the principles of Role-playing in a RPG, and that regardless of how one thinks of another playing in this manner that...
Pacifien wrote...
There is no wrong way to roleplay.
Modifié par MisterDyslexo, 17 décembre 2010 - 02:34 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




