Aller au contenu

Photo

Fight for the Love *Achievement Unlocked*


9243 réponses à ce sujet

#3001
Jagged Orchid

Jagged Orchid
  • Members
  • 457 messages

jlb524 wrote...

I do find it odd that ME2 is telling us that most species are open to inter-species dating (not just the asari) but their attraction still must follow the heterosexual norm. This baffles me.


That is the sad truth right there.

My FemShep can become intimate with a Turian (how this is even biologically possible is beyond me) yet MaleShep can not be intimate with another male. I don't understand this.

#3002
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages

MisterDyslexo wrote...

jlb524 wrote...

I do find it odd that ME2 is telling us that most species are open to inter-species dating (not just the asari) but their attraction still must follow the heterosexual norm. This baffles me.


One of the reasons I stated that it would make sense that Tali could be 'manced by FemShep.

I don't get their logic either, for the record.


I agree.

We see human/turian pairs (Garrus/FemShep) and human/quarian(Tali/ManShep) and even a quarian/turian pair in the Eternity bar on Illium (though, the quarian was more interested in a male human).  All hetero.

Even the asari (who are supposedly attracted to both genders of any species) are always shown with a male alien in game or are shown attracted to one, except for Morinth and Nef.

And, may I ask how the Morinth and Nef 'romance' ends....the young human female, confused about her sexuality and her attraction to another woman, is violently killed by her partner.  Hmmmm....what message does that send to the kiddies?

Modifié par jlb524, 17 décembre 2010 - 04:14 .


#3003
shumworld

shumworld
  • Members
  • 1 556 messages
If Big Ben Sniper is a bisexual option it's fine by me. My Femship Infiltrator would still hit that.

#3004
MisterDyslexo

MisterDyslexo
  • Members
  • 1 472 messages

Valagil wrote...

My FemShep can become intimate with a Turian (how this is even biologically possible is beyond me) yet MaleShep can not be intimate with another male. I don't understand this.


The Normandy's wizard, Mordin Solus, did it.

In their defense, thoough, it isn't a casual thing, and we don't even know if FemShep and Garrus actually did-the-do.

#3005
Guest_Phantom Actuality_*

Guest_Phantom Actuality_*
  • Guests

jlb524 wrote...
I do find it odd that ME2 is telling us that most species are open to inter-species dating (not just the asari) but their attraction still must follow the heterosexual norm. This baffles me.

It doesn't baffle me at all.  I would say it's pretty close to other futuristic fiction that I've seen.

#3006
Guest_Ms. Lovey Dovey_*

Guest_Ms. Lovey Dovey_*
  • Guests

Phantom Actuality wrote...

jlb524 wrote...
I do find it odd that ME2 is telling us that most species are open to inter-species dating (not just the asari) but their attraction still must follow the heterosexual norm. This baffles me.

It doesn't baffle me at all.  I would say it's pretty close to other futuristic fiction that I've seen.


Futuristic fiction written in a modern view. Ironic? Futuristic?

#3007
Eromenos

Eromenos
  • Members
  • 596 messages

Pacifien wrote...

Eromenos wrote...
It seemed to me that you were the one who believes a concept of fluid attraction is odd. I interpreted that as justification for the ME universe's rigid dismissal of M/M.

What? No seriously, what?


This is what you wrote prior-

You know, a character doesn't really have to be defined by his
sexuality. He doesn't have to bring sexual innuendo into every
conversation. Doesn't have to throw in feeders to see if another guy is
interested. He could simply not be interested in pursuing a romantic
relationship until the Reapers are on his very doorstep and he has an
epiphany that leads him to grab Big Ben Sniper Guy and kiss him
passionately before it's all over.

People complain that Shepard
is a wooden plank in the games, but the reason why is because it allows
great leeway for someone to roleplay the character, filling in the
blanks that are never explicitly covered within the game. If you
roleplayed Shepard as having no romantic interest in the first two
games, it's perfectly reasonable he would be "suddenly" gay in the
third game. That is fair.

If you did roleplay Shepard as some
hopeless romantic in need of companionship in the first two games, then
maybe his sudden turn of interest from the ladies to the men might seem
odd. That is the way you chose to roleplay it. There is no wrong way to
roleplay.


It sounded like you're saying that a John Shepard who loved Ashley but now loves Kaidan is somehow an oddity among men. Not because Shepard switched partners, but because he stepped outside his role as an otherwise "established" straight man. But established by what, default? I saw your statement as a defense for the homophobia committed by ME1, and by extent, ME2.

Modifié par Eromenos, 17 décembre 2010 - 04:22 .


#3008
Jagged Orchid

Jagged Orchid
  • Members
  • 457 messages

MisterDyslexo wrote...
The Normandy's wizard, Mordin Solus, did it.

In their defense, thoough, it isn't a casual thing, and we don't even know if FemShep and Garrus actually did-the-do.


This is true. We don't know what actually happened between FemShep and Garrus. I'm not even saying it was some casual one night stand. The point is, the romance was allowed to happen.

I still find a man falling in love with another man more realistic than a woman falling in love with a Turian. Can it happen? Sure, why not? However, if a romance like this can take place in the ME universe, there is no reason why a m/m romance should also not be able to exist.

Although, I have a feeling, this was never really up for debate.

#3009
Guest_Ms. Lovey Dovey_*

Guest_Ms. Lovey Dovey_*
  • Guests

Eromenos wrote...


This is what you wrote prior-


You know, a character doesn't really have to be defined by his
sexuality. He doesn't have to bring sexual innuendo into every
conversation. Doesn't have to throw in feeders to see if another guy is
interested. He could simply not be interested in pursuing a romantic
relationship until the Reapers are on his very doorstep and he has an
epiphany that leads him to grab Big Ben Sniper Guy and kiss him
passionately before it's all over.

People complain that Shepard
is a wooden plank in the games, but the reason why is because it allows
great leeway for someone to roleplay the character, filling in the
blanks that are never explicitly covered within the game. If you
roleplayed Shepard as having no romantic interest in the first two
games, it's perfectly reasonable he would be "suddenly" gay in the
third game. That is fair.

If you did roleplay Shepard as some
hopeless romantic in need of companionship in the first two games, then
maybe his sudden turn of interest from the ladies to the men might seem
odd. That is the way you chose to roleplay it. There is no wrong way to
roleplay.


It sounded like you're saying that a John Shepard who loved Ashley but now loves Kaidan is somehow an oddity among men. Not because Shepard switched partners, but because he stepped outside his role as an otherwise "established" straight man. But established by what, default? I saw your statement as a defense for the homophobia committed by ME1, and by extent, ME2.


You don' think you took that a little too out of context?

#3010
Pacifien

Pacifien
  • Members
  • 11 527 messages

Eromenos wrote...
It sounded like you're saying that a John Shepard who loved Ashley but now loves Kaidan is somehow an oddity among men. Not because Shepard switched partners, but because he stepped outside his role as an otherwise "established" straight man. But established by what, default? I saw your statement as a defense for the homophobia committed by ME1, and by extent, ME2.

Uh, I also said you took it out of context and I didn't believe that at all?

#3011
Walrusninja

Walrusninja
  • Members
  • 753 messages
Once words like "Homophobic" start getting chucked around you start dealing in extremes and dividing things. This is obviously a worth while thread with some quality stuff in it. I'm only a guest, but come on people don't derail the thread into sides.

Modifié par Walrusninja, 17 décembre 2010 - 04:31 .


#3012
Guest_Phantom Actuality_*

Guest_Phantom Actuality_*
  • Guests

Ms. Lovey Dovey wrote...

Phantom Actuality wrote...

jlb524 wrote...
I do find it odd that ME2 is telling us that most species are open to inter-species dating (not just the asari) but their attraction still must follow the heterosexual norm. This baffles me.

It doesn't baffle me at all.  I would say it's pretty close to other futuristic fiction that I've seen.

Futuristic fiction written in a modern view. Ironic? Futuristic?

You could say the same thing about hundreds, maybe thousands, or more, of stories, shows, and movies.  There is no litmus test that has to be passed in order for a writer to write a story.   It's fiction. 

Modifié par Phantom Actuality, 17 décembre 2010 - 04:33 .


#3013
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages

Phantom Actuality wrote...

Ms. Lovey Dovey wrote...

Phantom Actuality wrote...

jlb524 wrote...
I do find it odd that ME2 is telling us that most species are open to inter-species dating (not just the asari) but their attraction still must follow the heterosexual norm. This baffles me.

It doesn't baffle me at all.  I would say it's pretty close to other futuristic fiction that I've seen.

Futuristic fiction written in a modern view. Ironic? Futuristic?

You could say the same thing about hundreds, maybe thousands, or more, of stories, shows, and movies.  There is no litmus test that has to be passed in order for a writer to write a story.   It's fiction. 


But the context in which said fiction is written in is important.  The 'futuristic' fiction is written with 'modern' views on such things as homosexuality or women's rights.  Hence, the irony.

#3014
Guest_Phantom Actuality_*

Guest_Phantom Actuality_*
  • Guests

jlb524 wrote...
But the context in which said fiction is written in is important.  The 'futuristic' fiction is written with 'modern' views on such things as homosexuality or women's rights.  Hence, the irony.

It'll change, it already has, just won't happen overnight.  :)

#3015
Walrusninja

Walrusninja
  • Members
  • 753 messages
Yes there's irony, but it IS fiction. Same way as it's kind of ironic that our mobile phones are more powerful that a sort of "super computer in the year ......" in the original Star Trek. Fiction is written by people who are pretty much always going to be inspired by the world around them. There's division over homosexuality today, maybe that would change in the future, but maybe it wouldn't? maybe it'd swing the other way, even less acceptance? Fiction isn't really ever wrong, because it's made up.

#3016
Guest_Phantom Actuality_*

Guest_Phantom Actuality_*
  • Guests
Yes it is fiction, and fiction is never going to be reality.  It's really ironic if you compare ME to DA.  DA is in a fictional Dark Ages/Mideval Times fantasy type setting.  That period  in world history was quite hostile to homosexuality, to understate it, yet there it is in the game.  The Chantry?  Kinda reminds you of the Catholic Church, doesn't it?  If there's one setting that would be lacking open homosexuality, then that would be up there at the top of the list, I would think.  In neither DA or ME however, do you see homosexual couples together, except for the protagonist and his/her LI.  Same goes for the majority of fiction that I've seen.

Modifié par Phantom Actuality, 17 décembre 2010 - 05:04 .


#3017
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages

Phantom Actuality wrote...

jlb524 wrote...
But the context in which said fiction is written in is important.  The 'futuristic' fiction is written with 'modern' views on such things as homosexuality or women's rights.  Hence, the irony.

It'll change, it already has, just won't happen overnight.  :)


Well, the point of this thread is to try and change things.  You can't knock people for trying.

#3018
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages

Phantom Actuality wrote...

Yes it is fiction, and fiction is never going to be reality.  It's really ironic if you compare ME to DA.  DA is in a fictional Dark Ages/Mideval Times fantasy type setting.  That period  in world history was quite hostile to homosexuality, to understate it, yet there it is in the game.  The Chantry?  Kinda reminds you of the Catholic Church, doesn't it?  If there's one setting that would be lacking open homosexuality, then that would be up there at the top of the list, I would think.  In neither DA or ME however, do you see homosexual couples together, except for the protagonist and his/her LI.  Same goes for the majority of fiction that I've seen.



I know, and if you do see homosexuality (non protagonist) it's usually protrayed as a bad thing (see the Morinth/Nef example in ME2).  I think this is wrong and I am speaking out against it in hopes of a change.

#3019
Eromenos

Eromenos
  • Members
  • 596 messages

jlb524 wrote...

Phantom Actuality wrote...

Not a wide open choice

"We're not saying that one approach is better than the other. In our previous games, as we did in Jade Empire, as we did in KOTOR, as we did in Baldur's Gate, and many games before and in the future, we enable those kinds of choices, whereas in Mass Effect it's more about Shepard as a defined character with certain approaches and worldviews, and that's just who he or she is. So we constrain the choice set somewhat, but enable more tactical choices and enable a deeper, richer personality, because it's more focused around defining one character, it's not as wide open."


There's so much wrong here.  First off, during ME2, they marketed the game as allowing one to live their own space adventure via the cool game that is ME2.  That doesn't seem so pre-defined to me.    Also, there's a contraction.  If Shepard is 'pre-defined' to be straight, then why can the Female version be played as gay or bi?  For this to hold, either the female version needs to be cut from the game (and it's all about uber straight ManShep) or the female version cannot have any same-sex opportunities.  We know that both are untrue, as the female version of 'Shepard' is a part of the game and she can have two same-sex relationships (Liara and Kelly) as well as show an interest in Samara. 


It's because women are treated as jokes in ME2. The game is designed to appeal to the action-crowd, and for those who are accustomed to not dealing with women characters except for say female bosses who strip for you after they're defeated in Metal Gear Solid 4(I think), it's no stretch at all for BioWare to tailor most of the female squadmates into needy princesses so long as Shepard keeps at them. There are many things I admire in most of our female squadmates, but they were all tarnished by fanboy appeasement compelling them to give it up easily. BioWare operates on the assumption that most players want to "get with" the wimmin at the exclusion of all other approaches to a R-P-G. That is the primary reason for why it's easier than ever for ME2 players to accidentally lapse into unwanted romantic encounters.

Some of the women characters were lucky enough that they weren't called to perform to such extent this time, but all of them except Kasumi were forced to respond to some measure of verbal pawing.

Catsuits, heels, and cleavage in space-age combat. I haven't forgotten about those either. /slowclap, BioWare.

Modifié par Eromenos, 17 décembre 2010 - 05:12 .


#3020
MisterDyslexo

MisterDyslexo
  • Members
  • 1 472 messages

jlb524 wrote...

Phantom Actuality wrote...

Yes it is fiction, and fiction is never going to be reality.  It's really ironic if you compare ME to DA.  DA is in a fictional Dark Ages/Mideval Times fantasy type setting.  That period  in world history was quite hostile to homosexuality, to understate it, yet there it is in the game.  The Chantry?  Kinda reminds you of the Catholic Church, doesn't it?  If there's one setting that would be lacking open homosexuality, then that would be up there at the top of the list, I would think.  In neither DA or ME however, do you see homosexual couples together, except for the protagonist and his/her LI.  Same goes for the majority of fiction that I've seen.

 


I know, and if you do see homosexuality (non protagonist) it's usually protrayed as a bad thing (see the Morinth/Nef example in ME2).  I think this is wrong and I am speaking out against it in hopes of a change.


I remember Wade from DA:O (who makes the dragon armour) is in a "gay relationship" with Herren. As it turns out, when you do the DLC where you play as the darkspawn, you can see them fleeing in terror. Well, until Herren turns into a desire demon, put up a barrier, and teleports itself and Wade away.

Because thats... well, I'm not even sure how I should perceive that as :huh:

#3021
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages

Eromenos wrote...

It's because women are treated as jokes in ME2. The game is designed to appeal to the action-crowd, and for those who are accustomed to not dealing with women characters except for say female bosses who strip for you after they're defeated in Metal Gear Solid 4(I think), it's no stretch at all for BioWare to tailor most of the female squadmates into needy princesses so long as Shepard keeps at them. There are many things I admire in most of our female squadmates, but they were all tarnished by fanboy appeasement compelling them to give it up easily. BioWare operates on the assumption that most players want to "get with" the wimmin at the exclusion of all other approaches to a R-P-G. That is the primary reason for why it's easier than ever for ME2 players to accidentally lapse into unwanted romantic encounters.

Some of the women characters were lucky enough that they weren't called to perform to such extent this time, but all of them except Kasumi were forced to respond to some measure of verbal pawing.

Catsuits, heels, and cleavage in space-age combat. I haven't forgotten about those either. /slowclap, BioWare.


Yes, and that sucks.....lesbian women especially. 

#3022
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages

MisterDyslexo wrote...


I remember Wade from DA:O (who makes the dragon armour) is in a "gay relationship" with Herren. As it turns out, when you do the DLC where you play as the darkspawn, you can see them fleeing in terror. Well, until Herren turns into a desire demon, put up a barrier, and teleports itself and Wade away.

Because thats... well, I'm not even sure how I should perceive that as :huh:


Yeah, that's just a testament to how gays are portrayed in these game...not very well :pinched:

You should not perceive that very well, btw.

They won't dare show a positive and healty gay relationship outside of an optional romance.  An optional romance that most won't ever see.

#3023
Eromenos

Eromenos
  • Members
  • 596 messages

jlb524 wrote...

MisterDyslexo wrote...

jlb524 wrote...

I do find it odd that ME2 is telling us that most species are open to inter-species dating (not just the asari) but their attraction still must follow the heterosexual norm. This baffles me.


One of the reasons I stated that it would make sense that Tali could be 'manced by FemShep.

I don't get their logic either, for the record.


I agree.

We see human/turian pairs (Garrus/FemShep) and human/quarian(Tali/ManShep) and even a quarian/turian pair in the Eternity bar on Illium (though, the quarian was more interested in a male human).  All hetero.

Even the asari (who are supposedly attracted to both genders of any species) are always shown with a male alien in game or are shown attracted to one, except for Morinth and Nef.

And, may I ask how the Morinth and Nef 'romance' ends....the young human female, confused about her sexuality and her attraction to another woman, is violently killed by her partner.  Hmmmm....what message does that send to the kiddies?


I'm glad you brought up Nef and Morinth. I made a note of Nef's journal entry wherein she treated her feelings for another female(Morinth) as an oddity from the "norm" of being attracted only to males. That's BioWare's handy apologist reinforcement to the belief that straightness is the standard and that other sexualities are no more than offshoots.

The whole Ardat-Yakshi thing was a sensationalistic exploitation of evil-lesbian stereotypes lumped in with token sympathy for the terrors faced by same-sex parents...all females of course, in ME-universe. Insulting attempt to appease justifiable protests against their branding of same-sex asari with pure villainy. Because, victimhood is so much preferrable. Villain and victim, the only roles allowed for established purebloods and their families. Similarities to any social class(s) we're familiar with?

As you also stated, the heterosexual parents of Ilium were shown happy and privileged to chat about petty things. The purebloods were reviled and or inhospitable. Samara was no exception. The bartender is friendly, but remarks about breaking it off with her pureblood mate and child. Same-sex lovers just can't be happy in ME, though BioWare would be quick to label them  mono-gendered.

Modifié par Eromenos, 17 décembre 2010 - 05:36 .


#3024
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages

Eromenos wrote...

I'm glad you brought up Nef and Morinth. I made a note of Nef's journal entry wherein she treated her feelings for another female(Morinth) as an oddity from the "norm" of being attracted only to males. That's BioWare's handy apologist reinforcement to the belief that straightness is the standard and that other sexualities are no more than offshoots.

The whole Ardat-Yakshi thing was a sensationalistic exploitation of evil-lesbian stereotypes lumped in with token sympathy for the terrors faced by same-sex parents...all females of course, in ME-universe. Insulting attempt to appease justifiable protests against their branding of same-sex asari with pure villainy. Because, victimhood is so much preferrable. Villain and victim, the only roles allowed for established purebloods and their families. Similarities to any social class(s) we're familiar with?

As you also stated, the heterosexual parents of Ilium were shown happy and privileged to chat about petty things. The purebloods were reviled and or inhospitable. Samara was no exception. The bartender is friendly, but remarks about breaking it off with her pureblood mate and child. Same-sex lovers just can't be happy in ME, though BioWare would be quick to label them  mono-gendered.


Damn, I'm just glad someone on this site agrees with me on this :happy:

*Though, others have agreed with me, but most think I'm nutso*

It's horrid.  And, don't even get me started on how Jack is portrayed. 

I think also that the fact that asari (for some reason) have to mate with other species besides their own is problematic.  Before, they were basically mating with themselves and were a bunch of 'happy lesbians' but we all know that can't last.  They must leave those wicked ways and seek out other species....which, seems to always end up being males of those other species.

Yeah, the Nef thing.... it's also a terrible message to send:  when poor young Nef finally gives in to her lesbian desires, she ends up dead.


But yeah, it seems BW is trying to draw parallels between asari 'purebloods' and human homosexuals, and it's quite troubling.

Modifié par jlb524, 17 décembre 2010 - 05:52 .


#3025
Crimmsonwind

Crimmsonwind
  • Members
  • 1 295 messages
Nef ended up dead because Morinth was a psycho-****.



I never got this vibe that "lesbians and same-sex parents are evil" in ME. Quite the opposite for me, in fact. The asari don't have to mate with other males to keep the A-Y from happening, they can mate with human females, quarian females, turian females, etc. It's a genetic issue, not unlike certain things that happen among humans. Certain regions and ethnicities are prone to certain diseases and illnesses. It's the same thing with the asari, just on a larger scale.



Honestly, I think you guys may be reading into something just for the sake of shaking your fist at Bioware. I love a lot of you, but come on.