Aurgelmir wrote...
Its the pandering to a minority that I take particular issue with. If it suits the story, or if the story the designers are trying to tell work either way then maybe the occasional option or character here or there isn't a bad thing. Its when siginificant amounts of content are added to the game in order to appease a vocal minority, thats when I begin to think 'Was this the right design choice'. For me a large part of it is how much work the devs put in for which players.
My argument, and I often use this, is fem shep. I got the impression from looking around the forums that it was a popular choice however the metrics said otherwise, only 20% of players. Now when I think of the sheer amount of work in making that I have to wonder could there time not have been spent doing other things for everyone to enjoy.
Yeah. To me, this says that you think you're squarely in the majority. Also, that you think the majority should never have to give up dev resources for things they want, if there's a minority somewhere that might want something the majority doesn't care about. Which is a damned shame, because that sort of thing just ends up reinforcing existing expectations, and the vaunted majority never end up getting to try anything different or new. Like an MWarden/Zevran romance in DA, for example.
Let's do consider FemShep. The holy metrics said 80% of players played as MShep...NOT that 20% of players used FemShep. The number of people who played FemShep was unknown - we can assume 20% of players used FemShep exclusively, but
not that only 20% of players used her at all. Additionally, how many purchasers of the game fed their information back to BioWare? I know I didn't...I only play offline, and didn't allow for game feedback when I logged in for patches. I recall also that Soldier outstripped every other class - checking the Gamasutra screenshot, more people played Soldier than played every other class combined (the usage stats for Engineers were especially horrible). So, why have any other class?
Finally, I'll point out your last comment: "I have to wonder could there time not have been spent doing other things for
everyone to enjoy." Note the emphasis. You are not everyone. Neither am I. But you and I are part of 'everyone', just like gay and bi gamers are. Your prospective change - removing FemShep from the lineup because insufficient players are assumed to have used her - does not serve 'everyone.' Removing her for, say, additional levels or guns also doesn't serve 'everyone,' because if BioWare ever puts out a game where playing as a member of my own sex is not an option, I will neither purchase nor play that game. And as soon as I'm out - or anyone else, for that matter - you've lost the elusive 'everyone.'
At least have the decency to be honest. You don't care if 'everyone' is served...only that you are. You don't see the point in using dev resources for things you don't want to use, which is fine. I think most people on these forums don't, and they all think something different should be the focus. But don't indicate that people who want different things than you, who want those resources spent on things they would enjoy, are expecting BioWare to 'pander' to them, any more than you are. Because 'everyone' isn't served by the choices BioWare makes....only some of the people, some of the time. Which is pretty much all they can hope for.
Modifié par Temper_Graniteskul, 05 mars 2011 - 01:10 .