centauri2002 wrote...
lolwut666 wrote...
Sounds more like you're in denial.
Can't say anything back, so you have to retort to emoticons and smug dismissal.
Have it your way. I can't really takes seriously someone who thinks that psycho-lesbian/gay (don't know that individual's gender) rants make for logical argumentation.
If you're trying to get a rise out of me, it won't work. I can say plenty back, I just won't resort to that because that's not the kind of person I am. I, at least, try to remain respectful.
Very well, since you're pushing the point, why don't you give examples of these "psycho-lesbian/gay" rants and whilst you're at it you can define what a logical argument is. I'd love to see your definition of it.
How about this:
Siansonea II wrote...
lolwut666 wrote...
Siansonea II wrote...
lolwut666 wrote...
To be fair, there were never any options to make Shepard act gay on any of the games because homosexualism had been scrapped before release.
You can't say that something is "canon" just because of executive meddling.
lolwut?
Who exactly are you responding to? There's this feature called "quoting" that makes this clear to everyone, just FYI.
Also FYI: There's no such word as "homosexualism". The word you're looking for is "homosexuality".
And please, by all means, define the phrase "act gay" for us. Inquiring minds want to know.
I fixed it.
I'm not used to quoting because not long ago I was posting on GameFAQs, and you can't quote there.
As for "act gay", I mean showing attraction for the same sex and all that jazz.
Anyway, I won't even bother with you because you seem like one of those neurotic people, picking every little thing apart and aching to start a fight.
Spoiling for a fight? Moi? You know what thread you're in, right? Fight for the Love?
If you aren't prepared to present your side of an argument, to give the community some logical premise to discuss, why ARE you here?
So, because Shepard never had the opportunity to show attraction for other dudes, he couldn't possibly have those feelings? If it pleases the court, I would like to substitute "other dudes" with "quarians" in that sentence and recast it in light of the Tali romance in Mass Effect 2. Shepard never said anything remotely flirtatious to Tali, AN ALIEN, in the first game. They just prattled on incessantly about geth and other boring stuff, like the fact that she can't eat human food because of her DNA chirality, the fact that her immune system is so weak that she could die of infections extremely easily, etc. Then, suddenly, in the second game, there was this entirely new dynamic between Tali and Shepard. Shepard wanted to crack open that helmet and lay one on that mug of hers. Even though SHE'S AN ALIEN. And SHE CAN'T EVEN EAT HUMAN FOOD. And even though SHE COULD DIE. I didn't hear a lot of kids complaining about this 'sudden' shift in personality on Shepard's (and Tali's) part. But go ahead, give us a litany of reasons why 'maybe' that change makes sense. Give us a list of examples in the first game of exchanges between Tali and Shepard that you think might have been flirtatious. Than I will point out the rather obvious point that you could say all those same things about KAIDAN. Oh, and he's a human that could share a meal with Shepard, and wouldn't have to shoot himself up with antibiotics just for a few minutes of heavy petting.
Did not even TRY to understand what I said. I was OPPOSING what that taliefer fellow said. Simply choose to assume that I'm some kind of bigot.
And when called out on it, didn't even had the descency to admit to her/his/its mistake. Simply acted like a, as I had said before, "douche".
Logical argumentation? How about exposing opinions and facts in an unbiased way, without making assumptions or putting words on other people's mouths, and certainly not by making crazy rants?
Look, you're pathetic. Can say plenty back? Like what? You're gonna stick your head up your ass until I submit?
You give a bad name to the cause you defend. Who is going to pay attention to someone so self-righteous? Irrational?
Modifié par lolwut666, 16 avril 2011 - 07:37 .