9243 réponses à ce sujet

[Ramirez Wolfen]

I don't know if the correct term is monogendered know that I think about it. I thought that asari actually didn't have a gender.

[Centauri2002]

Ryzaki wrote...

Monogendered means "one" gender.

That one gender? 

Female.

Why do we have to keep explaining this? D:

I guess he's right about one thing, they're not really bisexual. They're more omnisexual since they can mate with most things, whether they're defined by sex or not.

Ramirez, they're an all-female race. And it doesn't diminish your point of cheapening her character, since all Shepards still have access to her. Whether you agree with the definition of sex or not.

Modifié par centauri2002, 24 avril 2011 - 10:08 .

[Jademoon121]

Ramirez Wolfen wrote...

@Cootie I never said Liara is a cheap romance, as Liara is already available to both Shepards from the start.

Also, Liara isn't really bisexual, Liara is monogendered. I know she looks female, but doesn't the lore say that they are monogendered?

Tali and Garrus weren't, but you still don't seem to have a problem with that despite your stances.
The Codex desrcribes the Asari as "an all female race". They're monogendered all right.

Modifié par Jademoon121, 24 avril 2011 - 10:09 .

[Cootie]

AngelicMachinery wrote...

Hey!  Leave the blue lady alone,  or, or...  I'll steal your ham.

You will NOT! It is mine, all of it!

centauri2002 wrote...



*snip*



Anyhoo, it doesn't cheapen it for me. Why? Because, to me, Liara is only romanceable to my Shepard. They are faithful to one another. Why should I care what happens in someone else's game? 

Exactly! I agree with you on every point. I just wish people'd stop being so... entitled. Blah.

catabuca wrote...

KnightOfTwo wrote...

Ramirez Wolfen wrote...
You could say the same about the Tali and Garrus romance. But that already happened. Mass Effect has enough problems already if you ask me, and adding to that list of problems would mess with my view of the game, hence ruining it even more for me.

I believe the bolded part says it all. To which I counter, not doing anything regarding s/s would mess with my view of the game, hence ruining it even more for me. See the flaw in the arguement?

Exactly.

HAH!
The correct answer to that question would be "Yes, yes I do."

YOU SUCK! 
YOU SUCK SO BAD!







*sob*

[KnightOfTwo]

Ramirez Wolfen wrote...

@Cootie I never said Liara is a cheap romance, as Liara is already available to both Shepards from the start.

Also, Liara isn't really bisexual, Liara is monogendered. I know she looks female, but doesn't the lore say that they are monogendered?

Tali and Garrus weren't available to any Shepard from the start. Does that make them cheap? 

Also, sex and gender aren't the same thing. Asari are sexually female, don't confuse the two. Liara pursuing both a male and female Shepard, when she is part of an all sexually female race, makes her bisexual.

Modifié par KnightOfTwo, 24 avril 2011 - 10:10 .

[Ryzaki]

centauri2002 wrote...
Why do we have to keep explaining this? D:

I guess he's right about one thing, they're not really bisexual. They're more omnisexual since they can mate with most things, whether they're defined by sex or not.

True.






Asari are female.

Straight from the codex.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 24 avril 2011 - 10:10 .

[JediMB]

Ramirez Wolfen wrote...

Also, Liara isn't really bisexual, Liara is monogendered. I know she looks female, but doesn't the lore say that they are monogendered?

Bisexuality is being attracted to persons of either sex. Are Asari attracted to persons of either sex?

Yes. Yes, they are.

Also, they are monogendered. They have one gender. That gender is female.

Modifié par JediMB, 24 avril 2011 - 10:10 .

[Centauri2002]

@Cootie: I know you agree with that, I was just putting that out there for people who don't. That, and I was desperately trying to stay on-topic whilst still indulging the silly.

[Biotic_Warlock]

Ryzaki wrote...

centauri2002 wrote...
Why do we have to keep explaining this? D:

I guess he's right about one thing, they're not really bisexual. They're more omnisexual since they can mate with most things, whether they're defined by sex or not.

True.


*double snip*

Asari are female.

Straight from the codex.

Daymn straight!

[Ryzaki]

Are Garrus and Tali's romances cheaper than Ashely's and Kaidan's?

[catabuca]

Cootie wrote...


HAH!
The correct answer to that question would be "Yes, yes I do."

YOU SUCK! 
YOU SUCK SO BAD!







*sob*

*takes the sugary things away from Cootie*

There, there. Come on now. It'll all be okay.

[AngelicMachinery]

JediMB wrote...

Ramirez Wolfen wrote...

Also, Liara isn't really bisexual, Liara is monogendered. I know she looks female, but doesn't the lore say that they are monogendered?

Bisexuality is being attracted to persons of either sex. Are Asari attracted to persons of either sex?

Yes. Yes, they are.

Also, they are monogendered. They have one gender. That gender is female.

Gender has become a social construct,  sex is what you have between your legs just saying. 

[JediMB]

AngelicMachinery wrote...

JediMB wrote...

Ramirez Wolfen wrote...

Also, Liara isn't really bisexual, Liara is monogendered. I know she looks female, but doesn't the lore say that they are monogendered?

Bisexuality is being attracted to persons of either sex. Are Asari attracted to persons of either sex?

Yes. Yes, they are.

Also, they are monogendered. They have one gender. That gender is female.

Gender has become a social construct,  sex is what you have between your legs just saying. 

Know that, but I figured I should stick to the terms used within the game.

[Clonedzero]

Ryzaki wrote...

Are Garrus and Tali's romances cheaper than Ashely's and Kaidan's?

yes, yes they are. by like a 1000% lol.

and as an overall post in this thread i support james sanders and unannounced possible new female squadmate as gay/bi romances!

but not established characters, that'd lead to bad writing and i hate bad writing!

new characters being bi/gay is cool though.

[Ramirez Wolfen]

I actually explained my points a bit better in the thread I made. I will provide a link shortly. Note though, that the thread is 68 pages long, so it would take a while to read.

[Cootie]

centauri2002 wrote...

@Cootie: I know you agree with that,
I was just putting that out there for people who don't. That, and I was
desperately trying to stay on-topic whilst still indulging the silly.

It's difficult to understand everyone. We tend to slip in and out of sarcasm-mode a lot in this thread.

I don't blame us. There's a huge wavelength-issue going on.

catabuca wrote...

*takes the sugary things away from Cootie*

There, there. Come on now. It'll all be okay.

It's easter. Let me have this!

[Centauri2002]

Biotic_Warlock wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

centauri2002 wrote...
Why do we have to keep explaining this? D:

I guess he's right about one thing, they're not really bisexual. They're more omnisexual since they can mate with most things, whether they're defined by sex or not.

True.


*double snip*

Asari are female.

Straight from the codex.

Daymn straight!

Actually, they're not straight. At all. 

@Cootie: Yep, it's very hard to gauge tone on a forum. Particularly when there are touchy subjects in the near vicinity. >.>

Modifié par centauri2002, 24 avril 2011 - 10:19 .

[Cootie]

Ramirez Wolfen wrote...

I actually explained my points a bit better in the thread I made. I will provide a link shortly. Note though, that the thread is 68 pages long, so it would take a while to read.

It would give you more credibility if you just summarised everything and explained yourself.
Having to provide a link to your opinion makes it seem very... lazy, and it removes some of your credibility and sincerity.

[Blacklash93]

Ryzaki wrote...

centauri2002 wrote...
Why do we have to keep explaining this? D:

I guess he's right about one thing, they're not really bisexual. They're more omnisexual since they can mate with most things, whether they're defined by sex or not.

True.

Asari are female.

Straight from the codex.

Didn't you make a thread arguing the exact opposite the other day?

Anyway, it just goes to show how little the doctors and Hudson know about their own IP. All they're concerned about when saying those things are making excuses.

Modifié par Blacklash93, 24 avril 2011 - 10:22 .

[thatguy212]

Cootie wrote...

Ramirez Wolfen wrote...

I actually explained my points a bit better in the thread I made. I will provide a link shortly. Note though, that the thread is 68 pages long, so it would take a while to read.

It would give you more credibility if you just summarised everything and explained yourself.
Having to provide a link to your opinion makes it seem very... lazy, and it removes some of your credibility and sincerity.

Turns out his reasons for no bisexuals was a copy paste from an old thread, so there goes some more credibility

[catabuca]

Ramirez Wolfen wrote...

I actually explained my points a bit better in the thread I made. I will provide a link shortly. Note though, that the thread is 68 pages long, so it would take a while to read.

Ramirez, please excuse me for saying, but reposting your old posts from a previous thread isn't going to answer our very specific questions in the context of this thread. It would be far better if you could engage on a post-by-post basis with each person who is asking you questions, doing your best to explain your position and defend it.

Otherwise you are going to keep getting endless replies, just like this one, asking for clarification, again, and again, and again.

[ADLegend21]

centauri2002 wrote...

Biotic_Warlock wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

centauri2002 wrote...
Why do we have to keep explaining this? D:

I guess he's right about one thing, they're not really bisexual. They're more omnisexual since they can mate with most things, whether they're defined by sex or not.

True.


*double snip*

Asari are female.

Straight from the codex.

Daymn straight!

Actually, they're not straight. At all. 

Some asari are.

[AngelicMachinery]

Blacklash93 wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

centauri2002 wrote...
Why do we have to keep explaining this? D:

I guess he's right about one thing, they're not really bisexual. They're more omnisexual since they can mate with most things, whether they're defined by sex or not.

True.

Asari are female.

Straight from the codex.

Didn't you make a thread arguing the exact opposite the other day?

It's because he's a big meany trying to crush lesbian/bi girls dreams!

[catabuca]

Blacklash93 wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

centauri2002 wrote...
Why do we have to keep explaining this? D:

I guess he's right about one thing, they're not really bisexual. They're more omnisexual since they can mate with most things, whether they're defined by sex or not.

True.

Asari are female.

Straight from the codex.

Didn't you make a thread arguing the exact opposite the other day?

(She was trolling)

[Ryzaki]

Blacklash93 wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

centauri2002 wrote...
Why do we have to keep explaining this? D:

I guess he's right about one thing, they're not really bisexual. They're more omnisexual since they can mate with most things, whether they're defined by sex or not.

True.

Asari are female.

Straight from the codex.

Didn't you make a thread arguing the exact opposite the other day?

Anyway, it just goes to show how little the doctors and Hudson know about their own IP.

I did. Just so people could rip the arguement to pieces.