Aller au contenu

Photo

Calibrations: Garrus Love and Turian Discussion


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
29107 réponses à ce sujet

#5201
Guest_mashavasilec_*

Guest_mashavasilec_*
  • Guests
 *panics*

#5202
Nilfalasiel

Nilfalasiel
  • Members
  • 1 741 messages

Alexine wrote...

Give in to temptation. He is calibrating the apple.


Fixed Posted Image

Calibrated apple = even less chance to resist

#5203
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

I agree that it is probably sensationalist advertising. Bioware advertising is not for hardcore fans so it usually just freaks us out or confuses us. That's why I mostly try not to take it too seriously.

As for rocky parts to Garrus' relationship, I may be in the minority but I would love that. I like a pretty hefty amount of angst so long as it doesn't get soapy and so long as it gets to be resolved in pretty good manner. I think old LI showing up could definitely cause some angst especially considering how Garrus seems really surprised that you pick him over the other potential LIs. I think it was ciaweth who said that Garrus would probably be surprised again if you keep him over your old LI. I could see some concern on his part about that. Granted Garrus is really private so I don't see him being confrontational.

Also, I can see him finally snapping if you have been flip-flopping on him. Say you renegade him in ME1 and ME2 and then you go all paragon in ME3. I could see him getting worked up over that or the opposite scenario as well.

If you meet his father, that definitely has the potential to cause angst or a rocky patch.

So does any kind of major anti-human or anti-turian sentiment from people disapproving of your relationship with him. I don't think he would care about getting his own feelings hurt, but I could see him being somewhat concerned about your reputation or about your relationship derailing the mission. If he thought harm to your reputation was making people not take you seriously and therefore be less effective at your job, I think it would bother him.

These are some great points. I think they'd provide some drama or troubles for the romance that don't stray into soap opera or overdramatic territory. They also seem very plausible and not fabricated out of thin air.

I actually "renegaded" Garrus both times, so it's interesting to see how he turns up in ME3. No telling whether I will paragon or renegade him again, if there is an option. Though, it may be time instead, in ME3, to just have Garrus respond to how you mentored him instead of steering him again.

#5204
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
@ Collider

I think so too. I think we will see some ultimate consequence where you can no longer sway Garrus one way or another. I don't really buy the "Garrus as betrayer" thing so many people do, but I think there is some potential in that idea. In certain circumstances I could see him reacting like Carth does to a Dark Side romanced Revan in KotoR. Carth doesn't really betray you, but he freaks and tries to save you from yourself. Given the devs have said ME3 has room for more variance since nothing has to be imported afterwards I think it is possible we might be able to see some more overtly sinister choices in ME3. If Garrus has been pushed very strongly paragon or renegade and then you go back on that in ME3, I could see him being concerned and trying to do something about it. Trying to save you from yourself as it were. It would make an interesting and fitting culmination to his character arc. We have always been his moral compass. Maybe now it's time for him to become ours.

#5205
Nilfalasiel

Nilfalasiel
  • Members
  • 1 741 messages

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

@ Collider
I think so too. I think we will see some ultimate consequence where you can no longer sway Garrus one way or another. I don't really buy the "Garrus as betrayer" thing so many people do, but I think there is some potential in that idea. In certain circumstances I could see him reacting like Carth does to a Dark Side romanced Revan in KotoR. Carth doesn't really betray you, but he freaks and tries to save you from yourself. Given the devs have said ME3 has room for more variance since nothing has to be imported afterwards I think it is possible we might be able to see some more overtly sinister choices in ME3. If Garrus has been pushed very strongly paragon or renegade and then you go back on that in ME3, I could see him being concerned and trying to do something about it. Trying to save you from yourself as it were. It would make an interesting and fitting culmination to his character arc. We have always been his moral compass. Maybe now it's time for him to become ours.


Yeah, except that only works if you do make a decision that's contrary to what you've been doing thus far: if you've been mostly Paragon and make an overtly Renegade choice, or the other way around.

If Shepard remains consistent, then there's no call for Garrus being their moral compass or saving them from themselves.

#5206
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

@ Collider
I think so too. I think we will see some ultimate consequence where you can no longer sway Garrus one way or another. I don't really buy the "Garrus as betrayer" thing so many people do, but I think there is some potential in that idea. In certain circumstances I could see him reacting like Carth does to a Dark Side romanced Revan in KotoR. Carth doesn't really betray you, but he freaks and tries to save you from yourself. Given the devs have said ME3 has room for more variance since nothing has to be imported afterwards I think it is possible we might be able to see some more overtly sinister choices in ME3. If Garrus has been pushed very strongly paragon or renegade and then you go back on that in ME3, I could see him being concerned and trying to do something about it. Trying to save you from yourself as it were. It would make an interesting and fitting culmination to his character arc. We have always been his moral compass. Maybe now it's time for him to become ours.

That's a fantastic idea. It's definitely a plausible alternative to the "betrayal" stuff. I would like, if Garrus feels that Shepard isn't acting like herself, Garrus being concerned and voicing his opinion against certain actions.

#5207
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages

Nilfalasiel wrote...

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

@ Collider
I think so too. I think we will see some ultimate consequence where you can no longer sway Garrus one way or another. I don't really buy the "Garrus as betrayer" thing so many people do, but I think there is some potential in that idea. In certain circumstances I could see him reacting like Carth does to a Dark Side romanced Revan in KotoR. Carth doesn't really betray you, but he freaks and tries to save you from yourself. Given the devs have said ME3 has room for more variance since nothing has to be imported afterwards I think it is possible we might be able to see some more overtly sinister choices in ME3. If Garrus has been pushed very strongly paragon or renegade and then you go back on that in ME3, I could see him being concerned and trying to do something about it. Trying to save you from yourself as it were. It would make an interesting and fitting culmination to his character arc. We have always been his moral compass. Maybe now it's time for him to become ours.


Yeah, except that only works if you do make a decision that's contrary to what you've been doing thus far: if you've been mostly Paragon and make an overtly Renegade choice, or the other way around.

If Shepard remains consistent, then there's no call for Garrus being their moral compass or saving them from themselves.

Well, I don't know. My Shepard is mostly Paragon, but has done some renegade decision. I usually prefer to play more mixed alignment Shepards. And I "renegaded" Garrus (technically, it's just agreeing with him on things, but all the same).

So, I might see my Shepard doing a "paragon" action and Garrus saying perhaps, he doesn't deserve to live, or we can't be bogged down by the rules. I'd love to see something like that happen - so we get a sense that mentoring Garrus really did something.

#5208
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests

Nilfalasiel wrote...

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

@ Collider
I think so too. I think we will see some ultimate consequence where you can no longer sway Garrus one way or another. I don't really buy the "Garrus as betrayer" thing so many people do, but I think there is some potential in that idea. In certain circumstances I could see him reacting like Carth does to a Dark Side romanced Revan in KotoR. Carth doesn't really betray you, but he freaks and tries to save you from yourself. Given the devs have said ME3 has room for more variance since nothing has to be imported afterwards I think it is possible we might be able to see some more overtly sinister choices in ME3. If Garrus has been pushed very strongly paragon or renegade and then you go back on that in ME3, I could see him being concerned and trying to do something about it. Trying to save you from yourself as it were. It would make an interesting and fitting culmination to his character arc. We have always been his moral compass. Maybe now it's time for him to become ours.


Yeah, except that only works if you do make a decision that's contrary to what you've been doing thus far: if you've been mostly Paragon and make an overtly Renegade choice, or the other way around.

If Shepard remains consistent, then there's no call for Garrus being their moral compass or saving them from themselves.


Unless a decision finally appears where Garrus' opinion is unshakable regardless of what you have done with him.  I don't really want to get back on the immutable quality debate but I do think he has some.  I could see something like this happening for certain choices.  After all, Carth doesn't always freak on you.  He only freaks if you go Dark Side.  Light Side Revan never encounters freak out Carth.  So I think "possible freak out Garrus in some circumstances" is plausible.

Modifié par Ragabul the Ontarah, 26 juillet 2010 - 11:39 .


#5209
Christmas Ape

Christmas Ape
  • Members
  • 1 665 messages
I get the feeling the Thane "I don't feel anything" is the best they could cram his "My body is a weapon, my mind is my own, I am at peace with my death" philosophy into a short trailer.

#5210
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
I wonder what the end game choice of ME3 will be.

#5211
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
Bioware actually does have a bit of a track record with this. Carth did and under certain circumstances Alistair will also do it.

#5212
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
ME2 had a small amount of it, too, if I remember correctly. If you paragon Garrus in ME1, he says something like that he thinks Shepard may not approve of what he wants to do with sid, for example. Also, when my Shepard agreed with Garrus about Sidonis, Garrus said something like "I learn from the best."

So I think they could implement something like that in ME3, but on a larger scale.

edit: lol typo

Modifié par Collider, 26 juillet 2010 - 11:51 .


#5213
Nilfalasiel

Nilfalasiel
  • Members
  • 1 741 messages

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

Unless a decision finally appears where Garrus' opinion is unshakable regardless of what you have done with him.  I don't really want to get back on the immutable quality debate but I do think he has some.  I could see something like this happening for certain choices.  After all, Carth doesn't always freak on you.  He only freaks if you go Dark Side.  Light Side Revan never encounters freak out Carth.  So I think "possible freak out Garrus in some circumstances" is plausible.


But that's exactly what I'm saying: it won't always happen. So it won't work as a conclusion to Garrus' story arc for all Shepards. I can't really think of any situation where Garrus would freak out on Shepard the way Alistair does if you spare Loghain, unless it's something completely outrageous like murdering a roomful of hostages for no good reason or something. He might not always agree with what Shepard does, but trusting that she/he knows best will still take him a long way. Garrus does have a tendency to put the goal of the mission first, so as long as Shepard doesn't engage in gratuitous murder, she/he can always justify what she/he does by saying it was for the good of the mission.

Then again, considering ME2 Garrus mysteriously became averse to collateral damage, even if Renegaded in ME1, maybe he would also pipe up if something Shepard does results in too many civilian victims. But still, it would have to be something pretty damn huge and have a measure of the unnecessary about it.  

Modifié par Nilfalasiel, 26 juillet 2010 - 11:56 .


#5214
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests

Collider wrote...

ME2 had a small amount of it, too, if I remember correctly. If you paragon Garrus in ME1, he says something like that he thinks Shepard may not approve of what he wants to do with Garrus, for example. Also, when my Shepard agreed with Garrus about Sidonis, Garrus said something like "I learn from the best."

So I think they could implement something like that in ME3, but on a larger scale.


He also expresses surprise if you renegade him in ME1 and then go paragon in ME2, which is what I do.  He says something like "I'm surprised you'd ask that.  You're the one who taught me killing was the best solution."

There is a "confused" version of Garrus as well in ME1 that lots of people miss.  If you flip-flop back and fourth on what you tell him, a gmish of renegade and paragon, then it's not always enough to sway him one way or the other.  I actually got this a lot on my first few playthroughs because my opinion was paragon, but he seemed so disappointed that I turned out like C-Sec in some areas that it made me tell him some of what he wanted to hear.  The result was I just confused the poor guy.  If you do this, he doesn't say anything about either joining C-Sec or the Spectres.  The last conversation where he thanks you for bringing him along just kinda peters out.  He says something like "just....thanks, Commander" and that's about it.

#5215
Christmas Ape

Christmas Ape
  • Members
  • 1 665 messages

Nilfalasiel wrote...

Then again, considering ME2 Garrus mysteriously became averse to collateral damage, even if Renegaded in ME1, maybe he would also pipe up if something Shepard does results in too many civilian victims. But still, it would have to be something pretty damn huge and have a measure of the unnecessary about it.

I'm guessing you mean Saleon's hostages? I get the impression Garrus considered them either already dead or better off dead, given Saleon's predilections.

#5216
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages

Christmas Ape wrote...

Nilfalasiel wrote...
Then again, considering ME2 Garrus mysteriously became averse to collateral damage, even if Renegaded in ME1, maybe he would also pipe up if something Shepard does results in too many civilian victims. But still, it would have to be something pretty damn huge and have a measure of the unnecessary about it.

I'm guessing you mean Saleon's hostages? I get the impression Garrus considered them either already dead or better off dead, given Saleon's predilections.

Agreed.

#5217
Nilfalasiel

Nilfalasiel
  • Members
  • 1 741 messages

Christmas Ape wrote...

I'm guessing you mean Saleon's hostages? I get the impression Garrus considered them either already dead or better off dead, given Saleon's predilections.


Saleon's hostages and the collateral damage to the Citadel. Remember that his order to blow up Saleon's ship was also revoked because it was too close to the Citadel and would've caused casualties, either from the explosion or from the debris, I guess.

#5218
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests

Nilfalasiel wrote...

But that's exactly what I'm saying: it won't always happen. So it won't work as a conclusion to Garrus' story arc for all Shepards. I can't really think of any situation where Garrus would freak out on Shepard the way Alistair does if you spare Loghain, unless it's something completely outrageous like murdering a roomful of hostages for no good reason or something. He might not always agree with what Shepard does, but trusting that she/he knows best will still take him a long way. Garrus does have a tendency to put the goal of the mission first, so as long as Shepard doesn't engage in gratuitous murder, she/he can always justify what she/he does by saying it was for the good of the mission.

Then again, considering ME2 Garrus mysteriously became averse to collateral damage, even if Renegaded in ME1, maybe he would also pipe up if something Shepard does results in too many civilian victims. But still, it would have to be something pretty damn huge and have a measure of the unnecessary about it.  


Right.  I'm just saying that in order for a specific culmination for his arc to be in the game it doesn't have to be one that all Shepards would see.  Arc for paragon Shep would likely be something else altogether.  The devs have said that ME3 will have way more variance.

As for what might specifically set him off, I can't really predict it.  But I bet the devs could come up with something if they wanted to.  For one thing, part of renegade Shep is pretty pro-human.  There could come a point where that finally pushes things too far.  It might also be possible for Shep to fall into some kind of Saren-like role, of trying to save the galaxy by weird partnership with something horrid.  Unlikely I admit, but possible.  Depending on what the "something horrid" was Garrus might snap.  On the opposite side, a really paragon Shep that errs on the side of "give everybody the benefit of the doubt" and "killing is not the answer" might set him off in some places if he thought the thing being spared was too big a risk to the galaxy or something. Like imagine if something like the Architect from Awakening showed up.  I would not find it a stretch for Garrus to be VERY displeased about sparing something like that.   I'm not saying any of this will happen, but I think a scenario like this could be done if the devs wanted it.   And I think it would be really interesting.

#5219
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests

Nilfalasiel wrote...

Christmas Ape wrote...

I'm guessing you mean Saleon's hostages? I get the impression Garrus considered them either already dead or better off dead, given Saleon's predilections.


Saleon's hostages and the collateral damage to the Citadel. Remember that his order to blow up Saleon's ship was also revoked because it was too close to the Citadel and would've caused casualties, either from the explosion or from the debris, I guess.


I agree with Nil here.  I think Garrus really softens on collateral damage in ME2.  He seems to have more regard for trying to help random helpless people along the side of the road and I think he is a little less trigger happy.

#5220
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
Either way, Garrus should change depending on how you mentored him. Although, technically the "renegading" are mostly just Shepard just agreeing with him. At least that's how I played my Shepard.

#5221
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

Nilfalasiel wrote...

Christmas Ape wrote...

I'm guessing you mean Saleon's hostages? I get the impression Garrus considered them either already dead or better off dead, given Saleon's predilections.


Saleon's hostages and the collateral damage to the Citadel. Remember that his order to blow up Saleon's ship was also revoked because it was too close to the Citadel and would've caused casualties, either from the explosion or from the debris, I guess.


I agree with Nil here.  I think Garrus really softens on collateral damage in ME2.  He seems to have more regard for trying to help random helpless people along the side of the road and I think he is a little less trigger happy.

I imagine this is because he got to see the plight the people of Omega face under the criminal gangs. Suddenly those suffering under crimes are more in his face.

#5222
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
I agree on both counts, Collider. And I know that's a really lame hook for someone else to post, but what else do you say?

#5223
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
One of the things that gives me great hope for Garrus returning in ME3 is how ME2 was. The game pretty much assumes that Garrus was & is your best bud.

Modifié par Collider, 26 juillet 2010 - 12:18 .


#5224
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests

Collider wrote...

One of the things that gives me great hope for Garrus returning in ME3 is how ME2 was. The game pretty much assumes that Garrus was your best bud.


Given Xette's poll, that was not an inaccurate assumption.  That poll left me feeling nine kinds of happy.  I wish Morinth hadn't been in it though cause I think she kinda scewed the poll.  There are all of like 5 people who don't hate her so of course everyone picked her as their least favorite.

I have great hope for Tali and Garrus.  At least, if popularity means anything at all, I think they are both quite safe.

#5225
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
Garrus definitely has a lot of cross appeal. For dudes, he's your bro, for quite a few gals he's their LI (if not, probably their bro). I'd like to see him in a CG trailer for ME3. That would get me fired up for the game, certainly.



For my part, Garrus is definitely among the few my Shepard would really ever confide in. It's fitting since we get to talk about the suicide mission with Garrus, like they're two of a kind.