Aller au contenu

Photo

Calibrations: Garrus Love and Turian Discussion


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
29107 réponses à ce sujet

#8451
Kim Shepard

Kim Shepard
  • Members
  • 3 257 messages
I wouldn't mind if Garrus has opinions that can't be changed. That's normal for any person to have. If Garrus objected to Shepard doing something that could kill off a lot of turians, I think that would be realistic. (And I really hope this doesn't happen, because the only reason EvilShep would go out of his way to save civilians is if he knew the turians would owe him one, or an army.) But I think "moral guide" is going too far. Garrus has always trusted Shepard's decisions no matter what they are, to the point that he's fine working with an alien-hating organization for now. I agree that I don't think he would betray Shepard or stop being loyal, but I have a few Shepards who would consider it a betrayal if he tried too much to change their opinions.

And because I can't look at anything on deviantart without my computer getting a virus... here's my attempt at posting that link as an image. Edit: Okay, didn't work. xD

Modifié par Kim Shepard, 12 août 2010 - 08:02 .


#8452
Pedpickle

Pedpickle
  • Members
  • 47 messages
Posted Image
: >

Modifié par Pedpickle, 12 août 2010 - 08:17 .


#8453
Mresa

Mresa
  • Members
  • 717 messages
 Thank you.^^
I wonder if Velarn would destroy the Reapers in the end of ME3 with his dismissive air-quotes. :o

#8454
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
Pedpickle, you are awesome. I love how you dart out of the bushes, deliver something awesome, and then disappear again. You're like the Garrus thread ninja Santa Claus.

I like the "moral guide" idea but it is not something I would expect to come up except in certain rather rare circumstances. I do very much like the idea of getting to ask Garrus for advice though. In that case, if your Shep was sure of themself they just wouldn't ask anything. But for conflicted Sheps the option to ask would be a cool addition after giving advice for so long.

*Edit* Also, welcome Mresa.  Delurking is always encouraged around here.

Modifié par Ragabul the Ontarah, 12 août 2010 - 08:22 .


#8455
Kim Shepard

Kim Shepard
  • Members
  • 3 257 messages
Councilor Velarn can kill mercs with airquotes. xD Awesome.

I would like Shepard to have an "Ah yes, Reapers" dialogue choice in ME3. Just to taunt the Council, and then have the option to save them later.

Council: The Reapers are coming!
Shepard: Ah yes, "Reapers." I thought you dismissed that claim.
Council: Shepard!
Shepard: Just kidding. I'll send the fleet in.

@Ragabul: Shepard having the option to ask for squadmate opinions might be the best way to go. MaleShep is conflicted about a lot of things (genophage, quarian/geth, rachni - basically war decisions that he thinks would have been right at the time) and makes some decisions from paranoia alone (destroying the base and leaving the Cerberus crew to die), so I could see him asking Garrus "Am I crazy for doing this?" Then the Shepards who aren't conflicted at all would just never ask.

#8456
Xsause

Xsause
  • Members
  • 1 106 messages
Mordin will own the Reapers with his dancing skillz.



Posted Image


#8457
goofygoff

goofygoff
  • Members
  • 481 messages
Oh, man. Velarn is like the face crusher from Kids in the Hall.



Which is awesome.

#8458
Pedpickle

Pedpickle
  • Members
  • 47 messages
I'm honored to hold such a title! xD

I really admire your guys' abilities to analyze Garrus and everything he does in a way I hadn't thought about before. I'd comment more on how I felt, but it'd only be agreeing with everything you guys already said.
You guys are awesome. :wub:

Modifié par Pedpickle, 12 août 2010 - 11:17 .


#8459
kglaser

kglaser
  • Members
  • 7 341 messages

Aris Ravenstar wrote...

Okay, I know they probably took out the romance for Garrus because he references things like her being his only friend, him being someone she can trust, etc... But to me it's also solid proof that the relationship means more than it sounds like it does at first glance. If all Garrus and Shepard needed was to 'blow off steam', they'd do it regardless. What they have is clearly not a cheap fling, even if they talk about it like it is at first.


I know I'm late here, but this is just SO perfectly true, I had to agree.

jillyfae wrote (re: not recruiting Garrus in ME1):
And, except for getting a little extra Wrex dialogue? Totally not worth it. So, none of you should try it. *laughs*


Thanks to you, we never have to make that sizeable sacrifice...and I appreciate it! :D
So have a cupcake too:
Posted Image

Modifié par kglaser, 13 août 2010 - 12:07 .


#8460
kglaser

kglaser
  • Members
  • 7 341 messages

Mresa wrote...

http://altiuso83.dev...ectre-174925473


<3EPIC WIN.:o

And Pedpickle, if you ever become an officer in Clan V., you already have a title--Garrus Thread Ninja Santa Claus.  :wizard:

Modifié par kglaser, 13 août 2010 - 12:17 .


#8461
Titanium Man

Titanium Man
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages

Pedpickle wrote...

Posted Image
: >


I TOLD you people he can cast Bigby's Condescending Air Quotes!

#8462
Timerider42

Timerider42
  • Members
  • 582 messages

JulianP wrote...

Finally a bit of time to check on this thread.  Sorry if I'm interrupting anything.

You guys have probably all seen this, but I just saw this:



It's a working Nerf Garrus-colored Mantis rifle!  Aw, how cute!  I wish I had a bunch of money I could spend experimenting with making and modding one of those.  Although I personally preferred the Viper when I did ME2; who needs a one-shot-kill when you can shoot twice in quick succession?  :P (But depending on my strategy, I may give the Mantis more time on the next playthough.)  I'm replaying ME1 as an Infiltrator instead of Vanguard, and for me, being able to use the sniper is totally worth the loss of the cool biotics.  Completely changed my combat style, and it's actually not bad at close range if one gets the hang of no-scoping.  No wonder Garrus loves his rifle.  Now if only it were actually possible to Nerf-snipe from 500 meters...





AWESOME.

#8463
Andaius20

Andaius20
  • Members
  • 7 415 messages
hey folks checking in since I've been gone for a few weeks. How's it all going?

#8464
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
Hey, Andaius. Long time no see.

It's kinda slow. Seems a lot of stuff has moved into Clan V. We are stalling for topics out here. All those walls of text have been our undoing. We have analyzed everything imaginable up, down, and sideways. I was just fishing for some relevant tidbit to bump the thread with. As soon as I think of something I will edit this post with it.

Okay, here's one.  Do you think the stick up the turian councilor's butt is his own doing?  Or do you think he is reflecting turian popular sentiment?  I wonder how turian politicians operate on that level.  Are they expected to be spokepersons or do they get some say in what they say? On one hand there is that "communal instinct" thing.  On the other they have "broad personal freedoms" and Joram Talid seems to suggest they can run for office under their own agenda.   Is the councilor speaking on behalf of Palaven?  The Primarchs?   How does he even get that position?  Is he elected?  Or appointed as lots of other turians seem to be?

I personally think a lot of his particular beef is personal.  Granted turians are conservative at large, but that guy goes beyond conservative.  He actually baits Shepard.  "This demonstrates just how fragile your mental state is."  And he almost seems to get worse AFTER Shepard saves the council.  He says some rather flattering things actually in ME1.  It's a weird turnaround.  Especially considering if you saved the Council, the news says that turian and human relations have improved.  Joram Talid seemed indicative of some upsurge in antihuman sentiment, but that seemed somewhat isolated to the Citadel to me.  Do you think the councilor is influenced by concerns on the Citadel itself more than stuff farther out in the colonies?  It's all pretty interesting to me.

Modifié par Ragabul the Ontarah, 13 août 2010 - 05:48 .


#8465
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
There are always more topics.

What do you think Garrus would do in this situation? Or this one?

Also, the fact that Garrus can only be romanced if recruited was a nice touch. I always thought that Garrus and Tali romances were the ones based around a heavy foundation of trust.

#8466
Andaius20

Andaius20
  • Members
  • 7 415 messages
Seems, we're taking after you now, since the fleet thread is out. Clan Zorah is the place to be now :P



Also ME 3 is looking a little different it seems:

Posted Image

#8467
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages

Okay, here's one? Do you think the stick up the turian councilor's butt is his own doing? Or do you think he is reflecting turian popular sentiment? I wonder how turian politicians operate on that level. Are they expected to be spokepersons or do they get some say in what they say? Is that guy speaking on behalf of Palaven? The Primarchs? How does he even get that position? Is he elected? Or appointed as lots of other turians seem to be?


I kind of take the council as plot devices for the most part - as well as archetypes of their races - which isn't unfitting because they are the "representatives" of their races. Velarn - the Turian councilor comes off with Turian sternness and as you said conservatism. I might also suggest that some of the coldness may be a reflection of the Turian-Human relations in the galaxy in general - there's a certain of mutual rivalry and dislike/distrust. Velarn is the avatar of that.

#8468
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests

Collider wrote...

There are always more topics.
What do you think Garrus would do in this situation? Or this one?
Also, the fact that Garrus can only be romanced if recruited was a nice touch. I always thought that Garrus and Tali romances were the ones based around a heavy foundation of trust.


In that first situation, I don't think we have enough data to really say as neither of those scenarios is really obviously "paragon" and "renegade."  I would say one is more emotional and the other is more practical (getting the therapy) but even that is largely subjective.  We really just don't know Garrus' opinions on most social issues.  I mostly think he's the kind of guy who doesn't think about that stuff a lot.  To him thinking about the future equivalent of childhood vaccine concerns or something is probably a bit of a waste of time when there are slavers and pirates and murderers running around.  On the one hand, he is somewhat practical and unromantic.  On the other hand, he is impulsive and we know he does funny things when in grief.  So I guess it depends on if he was giving advice on that situation or whether HE was in that situation in himself.  With giving advice, I would guess he would err on the side of practicality.  If directly involved in some emotional way, I don't know for sure.

With that transmission, I think he would investigate, so long as he didn't have bigger fish to fry.  If there was something more important afoot he would push it aside.  Or do you mean what he do once he actually got out to the location?

Modifié par Ragabul the Ontarah, 13 août 2010 - 06:05 .


#8469
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
Yea, I agree that it's hard to know what he'd do in the first situation. Just wanted to see what people thought.



For the second, about what he'd do about the scientist/soldier.

#8470
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests

Collider wrote...
I kind of take the council as plot devices for the most part - as well as archetypes of their races - which isn't unfitting because they are the "representatives" of their races. Velarn - the Turian councilor comes off with Turian sternness and as you said conservatism. I might also suggest that some of the coldness may be a reflection of the Turian-Human relations in the galaxy in general - there's a certain of mutual rivalry and dislike/distrust. Velarn is the avatar of that.


But why does he become even more dismissive (or at least fails to tone things down at all) even when turian/human relations have improved?  That's kind of weird.  It's probably just a gameplay quirk, designed to ****** you off at the Council and make you feel empathy for Cerberus (which I think is stupid; there's no "prettying up" Cerberus for me-necessary evil, that is all.)  Anyway, I still think it is kinda strange.

Modifié par Ragabul the Ontarah, 13 août 2010 - 05:59 .


#8471
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
As for that scientist, I don't think Garrus would have any qualms letting Toombs shoot him. In fact, he might do it himself. I think he would be suspicious of exactly what happens if you spare him: Wade gets immunity in exchange for testimony. Garrus would want punishment and would think Wade too dangerous to leave alive for the same reason as Saleon and Saren. He'd be afraid they might escape again or strike a deal.

#8472
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
Well the Council in general are plot devices - they are supposed to be stubborn and dismissive - otherwise there'd be no Mass Effect. The games revolve around Shepard taking things in her own hands, which is why her actions are so important and far reaching. Cause she's among the only people actually doing something to help. Anyway, Velarn himself may still dislike humans either way.



I saw ME2 as both softening Cerberus up but making them worse at the same time.

#8473
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests

Collider wrote...

Well the Council in general are plot devices - they are supposed to be stubborn and dismissive - otherwise there'd be no Mass Effect. The games revolve around Shepard taking things in her own hands, which is why her actions are so important and far reaching. Cause she's among the only people actually doing something to help. Anyway, Velarn himself may still dislike humans either way.

I saw ME2 as both softening Cerberus up but making them worse at the same time.


Yea, but the other councilors are staunch without being provocative.  In fact, they actually make sensible arguments in some cases and seem genuinely grateful for your help.  Velarn has a stick up his ass.  I think he is designed to be annoying and for the players to project hatred onto.  The council can be frustrating without inciting open hatred (a la ME1.)  They don't have to be ****s for Shep to do her own thing.  I think it's kinda unneeded. I dunno, I almost felt like ME2 was trying to herd me into being renegade in some places or something.  That stuff with Velarn didn't help.  Do we even know for sure that is his name?  I mean couldn't that just as well be the salarian's name?

Modifié par Ragabul the Ontarah, 13 août 2010 - 06:13 .


#8474
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
We don't know for sure that's his name. It's just the name people have been using, so it sticks. Like i said, I saw each councilor as representing their race in some capacity. The Asari one for example is the "patient and wise" one. The Salarian is the most accepting of the choices with dire long term consequences, because Salarians think short-term.

#8475
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
Shouldn't Velarn be reserved, practical, and not prone to sensationalism then? That sounds like a typical turian. Instead, he seems aggressive, prone to grudge holding, and provocative. That seems more like a krogan.



Sorry. Dead horse is dead. This is a nonentity to discuss I know. Ah well, I'll saunter off and go read the nonsense on the DA2 boards for a while.