Aller au contenu

Photo

Calibrations: Garrus Love and Turian Discussion


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
29107 réponses à ce sujet

#2426
Andaius20

Andaius20
  • Members
  • 7 415 messages

Kim Shepard wrote...

Yeah, I just enjoy playing characters more. None of my Shepards or Wardens are like me. Well, MainShep and I like the same characters - that's why she's MainShep. I wouldn't have a MainShep who talks bad about my favorites. xD (The "Saren's Shepard" title really works for her, doesn't it? I still wonder what Saren would think about it though. "Your Shepard belongs to me?")

Sometimes it's hard to play the Shepards who say/do things I really disagree with, like making MaleShep insult Saren and talk about killing him. Or EvilShep, who will bring Morinth on his team.


I do the same thing. Mainshep is how I would do it personally if I was in the world. Then I explore other possibilities. with RPing different personalities.  


EDIT: Top of the page pic!
Posted Image

Modifié par Andaius20, 14 juillet 2010 - 04:55 .


#2427
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
I do a mix of those things. I couldn't play a character I blatantly disagreed with until quite recently. Then, I had a revelation. I write a lot of stories and obviously many of my characters in those stories are nothing like me at all. So I thought, what if I just import the personality of "character X" from my story and use him/her as a model for my Shepard? I have found this works beautifully. This way, I know the personality already and feel like I have a stake in it because it is a character I created, but I don't feel uncomfortable making the character say something I wouldn't. My mainshep (paragade) is basically me imported into the game. (A much more assertive, badass, charismatic me obviously. I mean our morals are the same.)

#2428
Andaius20

Andaius20
  • Members
  • 7 415 messages

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

I do a mix of those things. I couldn't play a character I blatantly disagreed with until quite recently. Then, I had a revelation. I write a lot of stories and obviously many of my characters in those stories are nothing like me at all. So I thought, what if I just import the personality of "character X" from my story and use him/her as a model for my Shepard? I have found this works beautifully. This way, I know the personality already and feel like I have a stake in it because it is a character I created, but I don't feel uncomfortable making the character say something I wouldn't. My mainshep (paragade) is basically me imported into the game. (A much more assertive, badass, charismatic me obviously. I mean our morals are the same.)


Same thinking comes into play for more RPer's you come up with a general Idea of who and how a character will be and make choices to tha tend :)

#2429
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
Yea, I know. It's just that if I didn't have a firm template in mind before I started playing, I tended to swing back towards playing as myself again. It's better if I really define the character first. I even write down a summary of the character's personality before I start. I can't just think "This guy is gonna be more renegade than my last one." I need more than that. I feel like I have to explain WHY he is more renegade. That's the only way I can make myself believe it. I can't work with generalities.

Modifié par Ragabul the Ontarah, 14 juillet 2010 - 05:07 .


#2430
Aricle

Aricle
  • Members
  • 428 messages

Kim Shepard wrote...

Aricle wrote...

It's making me think about what I do more than usual (which is enough as is) to go the RP route. I enjoy your take with Saren's Shepard. When you describe your Shepards' thought processes, it makes more sense to me. Like Goat, I tend to be me behind the RP, my feet show beneath the outfit.

I actually find myself not liking this new Shepard of late, which makes it easier to play a role rather than extension-me. The part of me that likes Kaidan wants her to be a good fit with him in the end, in ME3; she may not be, which will make that much more interesting. Nevertheless, she is going to be faithful to Kaidan in ME2.

Yeah, I just enjoy playing characters more. None of my Shepards or Wardens are like me. Well, MainShep and I like the same characters - that's why she's MainShep. I wouldn't have a MainShep who talks bad about my favorites. xD (The "Saren's Shepard" title really works for her, doesn't it? I still wonder what Saren would think about it though. "Your Shepard belongs to me?")

Sometimes it's hard to play the Shepards who say/do things I really disagree with, like making MaleShep insult Saren and talk about killing him. Or EvilShep, who will bring Morinth on his team.

My newShep just killed Helena Blake and that was not easy for me- those little screen summaries BW puts in are odd, this one says she 'dies smiling at me wryly (paraphrase)'. Helena Blake wasn't *as bad* as her cohorts but this Shep isn't much on shades of gray when it comes to who's on the right or wrong side of the law.  She also had the Alliance keep Nerali Bhatia's body b/c that is a resource that could save future lives, as she tells Bhatia.

Modifié par Aricle, 14 juillet 2010 - 05:10 .


#2431
Goat_Shepard

Goat_Shepard
  • Members
  • 11 117 messages
Hey Andaius welcome back.

ciaweth wrote...

See, and that's why it bugs me when people paint Miranda as a Cerberus lapdog. She's just not.

So I can hate her as a person. Sweet! B)

Kim Shepard wrote...

Aricle wrote...

It's making me think about what I do more than usual (which is enough as is) to go the RP route. I enjoy your take with Saren's Shepard. When you describe your Shepards' thought processes, it makes more sense to me. Like Goat, I tend to be me behind the RP, my feet show beneath the outfit.

I actually find myself not liking this new Shepard of late, which makes it easier to play a role rather than extension-me. The part of me that likes Kaidan wants her to be a good fit with him in the end, in ME3; she may not be, which will make that much more interesting. Nevertheless, she is going to be faithful to Kaidan in ME2.

Yeah, I just enjoy playing characters more. None of my Shepards or Wardens are like me. Well, MainShep and I like the same characters - that's why she's MainShep. I wouldn't have a MainShep who talks bad about my favorites. xD (The "Saren's Shepard" title really works for her, doesn't it? I still wonder what Saren would think about it though. "Your Shepard belongs to me?")

Sometimes it's hard to play the Shepards who say/do things I really disagree with, like making MaleShep insult Saren and talk about killing him. Or EvilShep, who will bring Morinth on his team.


Yep, I had once intended to have such diverse Shepards, each playthrough unique to their background. Turns out all of my PTs are the same :lol: But hey, I'm still not bored, so don't give me that "your gaming is dull" bs.

But not even one Shepard is exactly like you? You have powerful willpower, my friend.

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...
And to make this vaguely Garrus related.  I tried Jacob as squad leader for the first time last night and he sounds all stressed out on the radio.  Garrus is the only guy who elicits no protests as leader and then makes the job sound smooth as butter on the radio.  He's awesome.


Really? Cuz all I heard when I chose Jacob as 2nd team was "Yeah!". His confidence is why I enjoyed choosing him. Hmm...I wonder if they give different dialogue based on certain factors of your PT. Odd indeed. After I found out Garrus can lead 1st and 2nd distraction team, I do just that from now on :D

"Nobody gets through that door!"

and of course nobody looks better for this scene:
Posted Image

Posted Image

Modifié par Goat_Shepard, 14 juillet 2010 - 05:10 .


#2432
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
My Shep is pure paragade on paper, a pretty confirmed moral absolutist (just like me.) However, in practice when a person is right in front of her begging for their life or explaining why they did what they did, she softens. It's like what Garrus says of Sidonis. "but when I had him in my sights I just couldn't pull the trigger." She does that a lot. Really hard in rhetoric. Not so hard in application. Sometimes she does suck it up and shoot them anyway though (Rana Thanoptis, Elnora, sometimes Sidonis.)

#2433
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
@ Goat



Yea, Miranda says of Jacob "let's see if your ready for command, Taylor." And over the radio he said "We're behind schedule. We'll try to make it up." and he sounded stressed. Later he said "We're at the doors but we're under heavy fire" and it sounded worried. When Garrus said that, he almost sounded like being pinned down wasn't a big deal. He sounded less worried and more frustrated. But then again Garrus tends to respond to stress with anger. Stressed Garrus is going to look pissed off not worried so maybe he was quite stressed there.

#2434
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
I tried all 3 team leaders, and Garrus was easily the best. Jacob comes off as fake since before the suicide mission we have no indication that he would be a good leader. Miranda has a somewhat similar problem but not quite as much as Jacob. The squad also has problems with trusting her.



Garrus: (accusatory, pointing) "I don't want you leading the second team! Half of us don't even trust you."

#2435
Goat_Shepard

Goat_Shepard
  • Members
  • 11 117 messages

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

Yea, I know. It's just that if I didn't have a firm template in mind before I started playing, I tended to swing back towards playing as myself again. It's better if I really define the character first. I even write down a summary of the character's personality before I start. I can't just think "This guy is gonna be more renegade than my last one." I need more than that. I feel like I have to explain WHY he is more renegade. That's the only way I can make myself believe it. I can't work with generalities.


Exactly, that's my problem too. And I don't just wanna be "pro human" or "kill everyone you can", but I can't think of a good character to roleplay as. Talk about laziness lol

Sometimes she does suck it up and
shoot them anyway though (Rana Thanoptis, Elnora, sometimes
Sidonis.)

Nowai! :o

#2436
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests

Goat_Shepard wrote...

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

Yea, I know. It's just that if I didn't have a firm template in mind before I started playing, I tended to swing back towards playing as myself again. It's better if I really define the character first. I even write down a summary of the character's personality before I start. I can't just think "This guy is gonna be more renegade than my last one." I need more than that. I feel like I have to explain WHY he is more renegade. That's the only way I can make myself believe it. I can't work with generalities.


Exactly, that's my problem too. And I don't just wanna be "pro human" or "kill everyone you can", but I can't think of a good character to roleplay as. Talk about laziness lol

Sometimes she does suck it up and
shoot them anyway though (Rana Thanoptis, Elnora, sometimes
Sidonis.)

Nowai! :o


Well how about Garrus?  He makes a great model.  Or if you don't like that.  Think the Punisher or Batman.  Those are great good characters that still have some renegade in them.

#2437
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests

Goat_Shepard wrote...

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

Yea, I know. It's just that if I didn't have a firm template in mind before I started playing, I tended to swing back towards playing as myself again. It's better if I really define the character first. I even write down a summary of the character's personality before I start. I can't just think "This guy is gonna be more renegade than my last one." I need more than that. I feel like I have to explain WHY he is more renegade. That's the only way I can make myself believe it. I can't work with generalities.


Exactly, that's my problem too. And I don't just wanna be "pro human" or "kill everyone you can", but I can't think of a good character to roleplay as. Talk about laziness lol

Sometimes she does suck it up and
shoot them anyway though (Rana Thanoptis, Elnora, sometimes
Sidonis.)

Nowai! :o


Well, sometimes she figures that such people are just too dangerous to be left alive or she thinks someone else deserves avenging and that since she is the only person who can bring them to justice, she has an ethical responsibility to do so.  Since she is strong and knows she can take the guilt, she figures she should pull the trigger as the next person might not be able to cope with it so well.


Sorry about splitting my post like that.  I'm lazy.

Modifié par Ragabul the Ontarah, 14 juillet 2010 - 05:23 .


#2438
Kim Shepard

Kim Shepard
  • Members
  • 3 257 messages
@ Andaius: Well, MainShep is only like me in character preference, not personality/choices/appearance. xD None of my Shepards/Wardens/future Hawkes are like that. (Most of my Shepards have DA counterparts though.)

I come up with an idea for the character, develop the idea by getting their personality major choices straight before I even start the game with them, and then the minor details are figured out after I start to play.

@ Aricle: I think MaleShep left her alive... but I will have to replay again anyway. What she's doing doesn't bother him, since he did similar things back on Earth.

@ Goat: I'm sure I won't get bored with Mass Effect after my Shepards start repeating decisions either. I have 15+ planned out... but Mass Effect is my favorite game series ever. :) I probably won't get bored replaying MaleShep even though I just played through ME1 with him. (Liara romance trap stopped him from moving on.)

And MainShep has fun helping Garrus kill Sidonis. I mentioned that she can relate to revenge, even Saren-level hate of an entire species.

#2439
J4N3_M3

J4N3_M3
  • Members
  • 2 308 messages
wow, lots to catch up on xD

Good morning everyone :)

I play Adept all the time, tried Vanguard once, decided that Charge is not my type of skill. Love my warp and singularity skills too damn much xD

I went totally Paragon on my current playthrough. Never did that before. It's just wow! I am so ignoring all the Renegade interrupts wherever I can and it's really interesting to see where this gets me.

#2440
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
Some of those renegade interrupts are almost impossible to ignore like shooting mechs that are about to attack me. How the heck is that renegade? A) It's a non-sapient machine. B) It's about to attack me! Other hard to ignore renegade interrupts include: giant krogan pulls a gun on me and sabotaging mech may save Archangel's life (and kills a bunch of mercs I would have shot anyway.) How are those renegade? Since when are"paragon" and "pushover" interchangeable terms? Yes, I know lots of sarcastic answers from renegade players are forthcoming. I've heard them all before. Believe me.

Modifié par Ragabul the Ontarah, 14 juillet 2010 - 05:34 .


#2441
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
Generally speaking, Paragon is inclined towards more diplomatic or non-lethal approaches. Renegade on the other hand is more hostile, aggressive, and inclined towards lethal force. Kind of, Paragon = Ends do not justify the means, Renegade = Ends do justify the means

#2442
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
So paragon should just stand around and let the krogan shoot her? I get the general idea but even paragon isn't wary about shooting people. Paragons still gun lots of people down. And how can you be diplomatic with a mech? Isn't that like trying to reason with an answering machine?

Modifié par Ragabul the Ontarah, 14 juillet 2010 - 05:38 .


#2443
J4N3_M3

J4N3_M3
  • Members
  • 2 308 messages

Ragabul the Ontarah wrote...

Some of those renegade interrupts are almost impossible to ignore like shooting mechs that are about to attack me. How the heck is that renegade? A) It's a non-sapient machine. B) It's about to attack me! Other hard to ignore renegade interrupts include: giant krogan pulls a gun on me and sabotaging mech may save Archangel's life (and kills a bunch of mercs I would have shot anyway.) How are those renegade? Since when are"paragon" and "pushover" interchangeable terms? Yes, I know lots of sarcastic answers from renegade players are forthcoming. I've heard them all before. Believe me.


I didn't ignore those! Some couldn't be ignored at all, like the ones on Mordin's loyalty mission where you shoot the gas tank to blow up the Krogans. And I also did the renegade interrupt to take out the tech guy who was repairing the fighter when getting to Archangel. But most renegade interrupts I just ignore, like punching Palaven when doing the interview or pushing the guy off the Dantius tower. Or shooting Elnora or punching the locked in Salarian worker.

#2444
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
I agree that some of the things that are defined as paragon and renegade I don't really agree with. Though at it's core, paragon and renegade aren't really good versus evil. It's just two ways of doing the same thing.



I don't really stick to one alignment on principle, since my main Shepard is "myself" and I disregard what part of the wheel the choices are. I prefer to have Shepards who are not as one extreme or the other.

#2445
Kim Shepard

Kim Shepard
  • Members
  • 3 257 messages
I have a few Shepards planned for each class. MainShep is a Sentinel, MaleShep is a Vanguard, and the Renegade after them is an Adept.

I like the Renegade interrupts. Actually, the Renegade Adept/Shepard #3 won't take all of them. It's totally out of character for him to headbutt a krogan (that's my favorite interrupt too), and he'd rather interrogate the merc than push him out a window.

#2446
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests
Yea, I ignore those too. I was just commenting on how some interrupts are really hard to ignore. Do renegades have some paragon interrupts they find impossible to ignore? I can't say as I've never done a full renegade, but I imagine there would be a few I couldn't ignore including: hugging Tali, pushing woman out of way of gunfire on Jacob's loyalty mission, and telling that horrible racist volus what's what on the Citadel.

Modifié par Ragabul the Ontarah, 14 juillet 2010 - 05:46 .


#2447
Christmas Ape

Christmas Ape
  • Members
  • 1 665 messages
I don't think I've ever not shot Elnora. The first time it was almost accidental - had no idea you could spare her life and my headphones cut out as she started explaining herself, so all I saw was her reaching for her shotgun and the little Renegade Interrupt logo - I thought I was saving our lives.

After that it just kinda became habit, but I haven't played though 2 that many times.

#2448
J4N3_M3

J4N3_M3
  • Members
  • 2 308 messages
I tried ignoring the Renegade interrupt on Mordin's loyalty mission just to see what would happen but it was impossible because the Weyrloc guy kept talking and talking and talking....was interesting to hear though and made Mordin gulp a lot xD In the end, I was just tired and interrupted *rofl*

I'm really going for ignoring them most of the time just to see what happens. Can't say it always works out but mostly it does. Garrus was all "whoa, everyone else would have killed that guy" when I didn't push the Merc off the tower. Whenever I kicked him off, Garrus said, it was a bit harsh.

#2449
J4N3_M3

J4N3_M3
  • Members
  • 2 308 messages

Christmas Ape wrote...

I don't think I've ever not shot Elnora. The first time it was almost accidental - had no idea you could spare her life and my headphones cut out as she started explaining herself, so all I saw was her reaching for her shotgun and the little Renegade Interrupt logo - I thought I was saving our lives.
After that it just kinda became habit, but I haven't played though 2 that many times.


if you spare her life, you actually hear her tell about the Ardat Yakshi before Samara tells you about them which gives you another dialogue option when going back to Samara. You basically tell Samara then that she is hunting an Ardat Yakshi although she is not telling you yet that it's her daughter.

#2450
Guest_Raga_*

Guest_Raga_*
  • Guests

Collider wrote...

I agree that some of the things that are defined as paragon and renegade I don't really agree with. Though at it's core, paragon and renegade aren't really good versus evil. It's just two ways of doing the same thing.

I don't really stick to one alignment on principle, since my main Shepard is "myself" and I disregard what part of the wheel the choices are. I prefer to have Shepards who are not as one extreme or the other.


My complaint with those interrupts is that they have no moral consequences at all.  They are completely neutral actions yet they are defined as renegade.  It's like classifying tying your shoe as renegade.  And paragon is highly combative at times.  The pure paragon options given about Cerberus are very "in your face."  When I play my full paragon character who is all about diplomacy and "give everyone a fair chance" I actually have to pick the neutral options when talking to TIM because the paragon options are highly confrontational and harsh.