Collider wrote...
It's true. Paragon and Renegade in many cases cannot be properly defined. It can be all over the place. I think in hindsight "diplomatic" wasn't the right term. I suppose we could say that paragon is more "morally righteous"?
Yea, that's kind of how I define paragon as well. Paragon seems to be big on mercy, diplomacy where it's possible, and is not under any circumstances "the ends justify the means." Paragon is about doing things with the least damage or trauma possible. They will take chances and do things the long, hard way if they think it will avoid unethical behavior or harm to people. They also seem to buy into that idea that "I can't predict how people will act, but I can control how I will react." They seem to buy into some kind of purity of spirit thing. They won't work with terrorists period despite Cerberus doing good work this time. They won't keep the base because "it's dirty and people died there."
To me renegade can be defined several ways. Pure renegade is utilitarian, consequentialist, pro-human, and all about getting the job done. Mission comes first to a renegade and "how" the mission gets done doesn't matter so long as the mission gets done. Renegade also seems less likely to back down from a fight, and is in general not someone who will take orders. Renegades seem to like to assert themselves.
Note I'm talking "pure" paragon and renegade here. I recognize most people are more nuanced than that. For instance, lot's of renegades aren't anti-alien but that means you have to avoid some renegade decisions. You gotta go a little renegon to do that. Likewise some paragons won't back down from a fight, but you usually have to go paragade to do that.
Oh, and Garrus.