728 réponses à ce sujet

[HopHazzard]

In Exile wrote...
It's the Dragon Age sequel. I don't know where "Origins" came from, but that was tacked on very close to release. For those of us who followed the game from way early on, it was just Dragon Age. There was a lot of outcry, in fact, when Origins was added on.

That's interesting. I didn't come to the forum until after I finished the game. What was the issue? Just curious.

[Falls Edge]

Ryllen Laerth Kriel wrote...

Falls Edge wrote...

Riloux wrote...

And this is a Dragon Age: ORIGINS (Emphasis) sequel, how? If you're going to take the biggest fantasy RPG element out, please don't brand it a fantasy RPG so I know what to avoid.

I hate playing humans in video games. This is a big reason why I love fantasy games and hate first person shooters. I can play as an elf or dwarf, and I do. Forcing me to play a human in a fantasy RPG is just shameful. I really hope the story and gameplay is enough to redeem this outstandingly awful decision.

I have to ask, have you played Planescape torment?

I would think the difference here would likely be that Planescape Torment wasn't a sequel, so it had not expectations from a previous game to meet whereas DA 2 follows 2009's RPG of the year where players could have a slew of options for their characters, and in the sequel those character options are missing.

No, I was just asking because I thought she might like to play it judging from her post.

[lRavenl]

disapointing :/ , im sure Hawke's story will be a good one, although, I liked the choice we had in Origins / awakening with several different races :/ gave you a different point of view, made your character more personnal. This seems like a step in the wrong direction.

[Seb Hanlon]

Please don't necro seven-month-old threads.



[#import "lock.h"]