blu_skye wrote...
Ha, they already are trying to grab yer cash. Looks like you can pre-order from the EA store. After the Awakening debacle, I'm just going to wait.
I'm a rogue, they can't pick my pocket, that easily.
blu_skye wrote...
Ha, they already are trying to grab yer cash. Looks like you can pre-order from the EA store. After the Awakening debacle, I'm just going to wait.
Modifié par element eater, 10 juillet 2010 - 07:45 .
As someone who's played Baldur's Gate, I think you're overreacting. "Rich, diverse, and immersive" aren't limited to D&D simulators with silent heroes, listed conversation options, and multiple playable races.Wivvix wrote...
Why do you care? Why are you even bothering to respond? You clearly don't fall into the category of RPG gamers from BG days who care for rich, diverse and immersive fantasy RPG's with traditional character building development. Judging from your post Bioware can do no wrong, hence your opinion is about as critically considered as one of those dolts who think Gears of War is the best FPS EVAR!!1!1!!11!
Plenty of the Baldur's Gate crowd was upset with Origins as well, for rapid health regeneration, a lack of permadeth, simplified towns and dungeons, less freedom and a smaller relevant cast, but I digress...The fact of the matter is that the fantasy RPG crowd won't run out and pick it up. They would have, if it followed the same formula as Origins...
It's a wheel instead of a list, and it's voiced. If that's a 'step backward,' then I must be underestimating how fragile this genre is. Do shapes determine what's 'rich, diverse, or immersive' now?...because of the significant changes to dialogue...
The only indication of any change to this has been that you are a human. Racial perspective is minimized, but the depth at which you can customize your character, both visually and through feats and skills hasn't been addressed in the slightest. For all any of us know, it may very well be even deeper....character selection, customisation...
...with respect to what? Is this regarding the conversation wheel again? Because the article details how your actions more readily shape the world around you, actually broadening your interaction with the story rather than seeing such consequences only unfold in a text epilogue....and storyline interaction...
With all due respect, you're deciding a great deal from a wheel and a race....most are in fact likely to wait for the reviews to come in, and shed light on whether these changes have been made for the better.
Modifié par pitchblaq, 10 juillet 2010 - 07:57 .
blu_skye wrote...
One of the great things about Bioware games was that you could be "anything you wanted to be."
Modifié par Riona45, 10 juillet 2010 - 08:21 .
pitchblaq wrote...
Plenty of the Baldur's Gate crowd was upset with Origins as well, for rapid health regeneration, a lack of permadeth, simplified towns and dungeons, less freedom and a smaller relevant cast, but I digress...
Tezzajh wrote...
how the heck can you call this a sequal? it's not , a sequal is a carry on and without your warden from origins or awkening your not carrying on the story, Look at halo for example it was called halo 1 2 and 3 cause it follows the cheif then they named others ODST AND REACH cause it dont follow the same character .
unless they rap up the warden in dlc or expansion or even if carry DA2 to DA3 i think this is stupid
I'm sure the same can be said of most RPGs. Relatively speaking, only a handful of RPGs really carry over your character from the previous iteration; most use the opportunity to add to the world in ways that the first character wouldn't or can't and tell a story in the same world from a different perspective.Avilan II wrote...
Well, you have classic games such as Fallout 1 and Fallout 2, which are about totally different characters.
Modifié par sonlockdon, 10 juillet 2010 - 10:39 .
Tezzajh wrote...
how the heck can you call this a sequal? it's not , a sequal is a carry on and without your warden from origins or awkening your not carrying on the story, Look at halo for example it was called halo 1 2 and 3 cause it follows the cheif then they named others ODST AND REACH cause it dont follow the same character .
unless they rap up the warden in dlc or expansion or even if carry DA2 to DA3 i think this is stupid
Riona45 wrote...
Hawke isn't necessarily male, or a "fixed character."
LaurenceEM wrote...
"You can play only as a human" definately sounds like some kind of fixing to me.
Modifié par Riona45, 11 juillet 2010 - 12:19 .
ECV Press wrote...
Sad about the inability to be elf or dwarf, but at least I get to play a woman. Can't get into a game unless I can play my own sex.
Modifié par caffinefiend23, 11 juillet 2010 - 05:56 .
People are jumping all over this because you cant do a few things in DA2 you did in DA:O.