Gegenlicht wrote...
Valthaur wrote...
But deeper is always better
*ahem*
Depth does not necessarily equal quality. Nerve ends stop at some point.
What?
Mike Hawke would like to have a word with you.
Deeper Friendships in DA2?
Débuté par
moteh
, juil. 10 2010 09:37
#101
Posté 11 juillet 2010 - 11:04
LPPrince
-
- Members
- 54 954 messages
Mike Hawke would like to have a word with you.
Retour en haut
#102
Posté 11 juillet 2010 - 11:06
Gegenlicht
-
- Members
- 317 messages
LPPrince wrote...
Gegenlicht wrote...
Valthaur wrote...
But deeper is always better
*ahem*
Depth does not necessarily equal quality. Nerve ends stop at some point.
What?
Mike Hawke would like to have a word with you.
In private?
#103
Posté 11 juillet 2010 - 11:10
Gill Kaiser
-
- Members
- 6 061 messages
Exactly. The whole point is that it's adaptive. Above a certain, token length, it's not particularly important. Too much can be... well, too much.Gegenlicht wrote...
Valthaur wrote...
But deeper is always better
*ahem*
Depth does not necessarily equal quality. Nerve ends stop at some point.
What?
#104
Posté 11 juillet 2010 - 11:11
LPPrince
-
- Members
- 54 954 messages
Gegenlicht wrote...
LPPrince wrote...
Gegenlicht wrote...
Valthaur wrote...
But deeper is always better
*ahem*
Depth does not necessarily equal quality. Nerve ends stop at some point.
What?
Mike Hawke would like to have a word with you.
In private?
In his Appreciation Group.
#105
Posté 11 juillet 2010 - 11:12
LPPrince
-
- Members
- 54 954 messages
Gill Kaiser wrote...
Exactly. The whole point is that it's adaptive. Above a certain, token length, it's not particularly important. Too much can be... well, too much.Gegenlicht wrote...
Valthaur wrote...
But deeper is always better
*ahem*
Depth does not necessarily equal quality. Nerve ends stop at some point.
What?
God, I read that in the wrong way.
#106
Posté 11 juillet 2010 - 11:26
Gegenlicht
-
- Members
- 317 messages
I thought we were generally being ambiguous to begin with?
Edit:
And Gill's right. There's only so much depth you can stomach, after that it's waisted and just for bragging rights.
For some reason, this edit hasn't been showing up.
Edit:
And Gill's right. There's only so much depth you can stomach, after that it's waisted and just for bragging rights.
For some reason, this edit hasn't been showing up.
Modifié par Gegenlicht, 11 juillet 2010 - 11:28 .
#107
Posté 11 juillet 2010 - 11:31
Gill Kaiser
-
- Members
- 6 061 messages
...or did you?LPPrince wrote...
Gill Kaiser wrote...
Exactly. The whole point is that it's adaptive. Above a certain, token length, it's not particularly important. Too much can be... well, too much.Gegenlicht wrote...
Valthaur wrote...
But deeper is always better
*ahem*
Depth does not necessarily equal quality. Nerve ends stop at some point.
What?
God, I read that in the wrong way.
#108
Posté 11 juillet 2010 - 11:33
LPPrince
-
- Members
- 54 954 messages
Gill Kaiser wrote...
...or did you?LPPrince wrote...
Gill Kaiser wrote...
Exactly. The whole point is that it's adaptive. Above a certain, token length, it's not particularly important. Too much can be... well, too much.Gegenlicht wrote...
Valthaur wrote...
But deeper is always better
*ahem*
Depth does not necessarily equal quality. Nerve ends stop at some point.
What?
God, I read that in the wrong way.
AWW GAWD.
