Saibh wrote...
Games4ever wrote...
Rubbish Hero wrote...
Braag wrote...
- Fox News controversy was total BS. They said ME has Full frontal nudity which it clearly has not. Then again it's fox news and it's their job to come up with bs.
- The DA:O love scenes were all ready toned down compared to ME 1. You see worse stuff in PG-13 movies.
- OP sounds kinda insecure.
Grand Theft Auto: Lost And Dammed had fullfrontal nuditity, you see a characters dingdong with pubic hair.
Pretty much no fuss made. Besides, everyone likes hot milf aliens with massive cleavage, it helps sell games.
Rockstar is not afraid to show adults the most natural in this world,it's one of the reasons so many buy and love their games.
You know, you're awfully concerned with seeing pixel and polygon nudity. The game absolutely doesn't need it; it makes a lot of people uncomfortable, it almost always brings the game down a few notches in "maturity" (not the fake kind), and it nets that abhorrent AO rating.
I would simply prefer to see better done romance scenes, if they're done at all. In cases like Isabela or Cammen and Gheyna, I don't think we need to see the scene in question. For roleplaying purposes, nothing is gained by seeing it. In a romance, seeing the romance scene is a payoff. No full-frontal needed.
If it's there, it better be done right.
I just don't understand why polygon nudity makes a lot of people uncomfortable? we are talking of people over 17 right? and I'm not talking about pornographic stuff,just two naked people that makes love without you need to see more than their naked body's.





Retour en haut




