Shandepared wrote...
I prefer to think of the Matrix as a wonderful standalone film.
I love how Neo's Godhood turns into just better Kung Fu in Reloaded.
Shandepared wrote...
I prefer to think of the Matrix as a wonderful standalone film.
I go for that "reject your reality and substitute my own" line of thinking as well.Shandepared wrote...
I prefer to think of the Matrix as a wonderful standalone film.
I always saw Bab5 as DnD in space, but with a writer who knew what he was doing.Pacifien wrote...
Or hey, watch Babylon 5.NICKjnp wrote...
If you want a rip off of LOTR... then read the Shannara books.
MadInfiltrator wrote...
Word.InvaderErl wrote...
Toy Story!
Onyx Jaguar wrote...
I do the same for the Alien movies
Hicks did not die
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
Any chance we could reach a concensus on what is actually the worst 'trilogy'?
Guest_Shandepared_*
Onyx Jaguar wrote...
I do the same for the Alien movies
Hicks did not die
Guest_Shandepared_*
Onyx Jaguar wrote...
Naked Gun trilogy?
NICKjnp wrote...
Onyx Jaguar wrote...
I do the same for the Alien movies
Hicks did not die
Neither did Ripley... wait.... oh yeah... they resurected her.
Onyx Jaguar wrote...
NICKjnp wrote...
Onyx Jaguar wrote...
I do the same for the Alien movies
Hicks did not die
Neither did Ripley... wait.... oh yeah... they resurected her.
Not even Ron Pearlman and the guy from Blu Velvet and one Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest could save that movie
BLADE TRILOGY DIDN'T HAVE A GOOD THIRD MOVIE
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
Onyx, will we do the same for Dragon Age when our favorite ending gets retconned?
Also, the Metroid Prime trilogy could not have ended any worse.
Onyx Jaguar wrote...
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
Onyx, will we do the same for Dragon Age when our favorite ending gets retconned?
Also, the Metroid Prime trilogy could not have ended any worse.
There are no heroes Dragon Age is daaaaaaark fantasy
Yeah
I am holding on to a thimble of optimism because Gaider's reply on this subject made zero sense
Pacifien wrote...
I go for that "reject your reality and substitute my own" line of thinking as well.Shandepared wrote...
I prefer to think of the Matrix as a wonderful standalone film.

Modifié par didymos1120, 12 juillet 2010 - 03:30 .
This answers so many unasked questions I have had.smudboy wrote...
I always saw Bab5 as DnD in space, but with a writer who knew what he was doing.
I know I'm just helping my thread steer off in the wrong direction, but I apply this logic to Predators. I only consider the original movie, and add the new one (Predators), as its only sequel.Pacifien wrote...
I go for that "reject your reality and substitute my own" line of thinking as well.Shandepared wrote...
I prefer to think of the Matrix as a wonderful standalone film.
Yes, but what exactly would that do? The cake analogy is simple, but it still shows the futility of what one's doing is pointless. We've no idea what these individual soldier's role will be in stopping the bad guys. They're simply there, or not? It is senseless. More intel is required before an actual plan can be constructed. At that point, you can then acquire said characters, and give them specific roles to enact a plan, as opposed to having them sit around while the intel comes available. Cart before the horse.theelementslayer wrote...
I think its more "Id rather have the people and not need them, or at least have someone there even if it is the wrong people, then have no one there when the reapers come" kind of approach. And I think TIM knows more then he lets on, just he always seems right. WIth the collectors, with Horizon, the derilict repear ect.
didymos1120 wrote...
Pacifien wrote...
I go for that "reject your reality and substitute my own" line of thinking as well.Shandepared wrote...
I prefer to think of the Matrix as a wonderful standalone film.
i think they replace themselves. They are from a while before, the cycle before the Protheans I believe. But we may see some in zany forms yet un-thought-of.Palathas wrote...
I have no issue with the story and how everything flows, but I have just one issue. The part where each new Reaper takes on the appearance of the race that made it. So far I haven't seen a whole lot of Reapers but the ones I have seen have all looked the same, except the "Human Reaper". So far I've seen Sovereign, the derelict and an obscured Harbinger, you also get a reasonable view of the Reaper fleet and they all looked pretty much the same to me.
So why did the Human Reaper look like a Terminator wanna be? That is my only sticking point, it just didn't fit for me, it looked really out of place. One thing I have to point out though is that the Human Reaper was in a very early stage of it's development so it's overall look may have changed to something a little different. It's hard to say when you don't have a full view of where it was supposed to be heading. Maybe we will find out in ME 3.
smudboy wrote...
Yes, but what exactly would that do? The cake analogy is simple, but it still shows the futility of what one's doing is pointless. We've no idea what these individual soldier's role will be in stopping the bad guys. They're simply there, or not? It is senseless. More intel is required before an actual plan can be constructed. At that point, you can then acquire said characters, and give them specific roles to enact a plan, as opposed to having them sit around while the intel comes available. Cart before the horse.theelementslayer wrote...
I think its more "Id rather have the people and not need them, or at least have someone there even if it is the wrong people, then have no one there when the reapers come" kind of approach. And I think TIM knows more then he lets on, just he always seems right. WIth the collectors, with Horizon, the derilict repear ect.