Still there was a fiddrence and a huge diffrence betyween the alpha and E3. The alpha was the first we ever saw. Thus we should all come down, now if in the future the game looks the same, then that would be crap.
That's why it was delayed. They showcased the game with the old design during E3 2008 in July, the game came out at the end of October 2009.Slidell505 wrote...
Borderlands completely changed its art design in the later stages of its production.
Arius23 wrote...
Still there was a fiddrence and a huge diffrence betyween the alpha and E3. The alpha was the first we ever saw. Thus we should all come down, now if in the future the game looks the same, then that would be crap.
I guess that's true, but dang, talk about not making a first good impression.
They should have way better in-game shots to present us with by now.
Exuro89 wrote...
So you agree that the E3 2009 trailer and the final game don't look all that different?kraidy1117 wrote...
Arius23 wrote...
kraidy1117 wrote...
dbankier wrote...
Estel78 wrote...
I dunno what you're on but i don't see any difference between the E3 2009 trailer and the 2010 trailer graphics wise.kraidy1117 wrote...
You just failed.
ME2 at GDC 2009.
ME2 at E3 2009
ME2 finish product, 2010
You do not know what your talking about.
The first clip doesn't even have texture mapping at the start, just an untextured checkerboard.
Don't bother with him. He is just like the rest of the DA2 haters that will bash anything.
You're smoking some good stuff dude. The 2009 and 2010 trailer aren't that much different. Take a look at the screens we've been presented with, with only about 8 months of development left (not including bug-testing, packaging, shipping, etc), and then take a look at the screens of the Witcher 2, which will probably come out around the same time.
I have a feeling those aren't "official" screenies though. I have faith that the game will look at least as good as ME2.
*gets on hands and knees and prays*
Still there was a fiddrence and a huge diffrence betyween the alpha and E3. The alpha was the first we ever saw. Thus we should all come down, now if in the future the game looks the same, then that would be crap.
As you can see in the GDC video, the took care to mark "early development footage" as such. The E3 trailer was not "early development footage" and it didn't have such mark.kraidy1117 wrote...
That's alpha and that was the first thing we saw of ME2. Until we see real gameplay vids that are not alpha, everyone should stop whining and complaining.
tmp7704 wrote...
As you can see in the GDC video, the took care to mark "early development footage" as such. The E3 trailer was not "early development footage" and it didn't have such mark.kraidy1117 wrote...
That's alpha and that was the first thing we saw of ME2. Until we see real gameplay vids that are not alpha, everyone should stop whining and complaining.
The screenshots released for DA2 aren't marked as "early development footage" either. You can read anything you want into that, but it's curious. It would be also curious decision to release the early alpha screens when they should have something better available, otherwise their statements how the DA2 graphics are much improved is based on... what exactly, wishful thinking?
sage_viper wrote...
So, hey, guys and gals, what do you think of the new Darkspawn? Pretty not Darkspawny, eh?
You're imagining things, there's no difference in graphic fidelity between the 2009 and the 2010 trailer. It's also difficult to make comparisons since both trailers are comprised of different shot. As for the GDC video, that wasn't even meant to be seen by the public, it was by developers for developers to show how they went about developing the levels, hence the placeholder objects, plus the video is in crappy quality thus comparisons are mood.kraidy1117 wrote...
*facepalm* if you can't tell the diffrence between the lighting and modals you need better eyes. Hell even the hud was diffrent then the one they where gonig to use at first. I have just proved you have no clue what your talking about, these are alpha shots and you have just made your self look like a moron.
Modifié par Estel78, 13 juillet 2010 - 01:58 .
Estel78 wrote...
You're imagining things, there's no difference in graphic fidelity between the 2009 and the 2010 trailer. As for the GDC video, that wasn't even meant to be seen by the public, it was by developers for developers to show how they went about developing the levels, hence the placeholder objects, plus the video is in crappy quality thus comparisons are mood.kraidy1117 wrote...
*facepalm* if you can't tell the diffrence between the lighting and modals you need better eyes. Hell even the hud was diffrent then the one they where gonig to use at first. I have just proved you have no clue what your talking about, these are alpha shots and you have just made your self look like a moron.
Modifié par Rubbish Hero, 13 juillet 2010 - 01:56 .
sage_viper wrote...
So, hey, guys and gals, what do you think of the new Darkspawn? Pretty not Darkspawny, eh?
Whatever, dude. Keep imagining things, i don't care...kraidy1117 wrote...
Orly? That's funny because people have showed what happens at the GDC for years now. Pleese stop embrasing yourself.
Rubbish Hero wrote...
Rubbish Hero wrote...
Modifié par Nosuchluck, 13 juillet 2010 - 02:05 .
Rubbish Hero wrote...
There is bump mapping on the characters, look closely.
Nosuchluck wrote...
Great. They've changed the ogre from a scary intimidating best in to something which just looks retarded. I didn't mind the orcish Darkspawn of the first game, the new designs make them look like pale goths you'd find in a nightclub.
There's also some form of lighting as well. You can see specular lighting in first shot on Hawke's arm, and characters' dynamic shadows in the second shot.Rubbish Hero wrote...
There is bump mapping on the characters, look closely.
Modifié par Rubbish Hero, 13 juillet 2010 - 02:08 .
Retour en haut