Cruxie wrote...
WOW really? everyone is panning a game
announced A WEEK AGO
YES!.
We have many reasons to paininning this game and a lot of more:
a) Predefined character Mike Hawke insted of personalizable character (no race choice).
b)"Dynamic" action rpg combat style in a dragon age game.
c)All plot from dragon age origins is gone. Its none or few conection between dragon age origins and dragon age 2.
d)Turning into Dragon Effect. This game is gonna use mass effect diablog system and problaby some more features turning Dragon age in to a Mass Age.
e) The most important reason is that Dragon age 2 is gonna be realeased in 6-7 months. Dragon age origins taked bioware 6 years of desing. And now dragon age 2, 6-7 months?. OPEN YOUR EYES Mike Hawkee lovers, this is WRONG.
I am going to pick apart your post now, because what you said is asinine.
"a) Predefined character Mike Hawke insted of personalizable character
(no race choice). "
You still get to pick your gender, appearance, and class. You also will have a chance at giving your character a first name. The only thing being chosen for you is your last name and race. It looks (according to the info released) like you even get to pick the reason Hawke had for leaving Lothering. That *is* personalization. You didn't get to pick a surname *or* what people called you ("Thanks, Warden" etc) in DA:O. This is a very weak argument. I can understand being irked about not picking your race, but it's not game breaking, and it doesn't mean you don't get customization.
b)"Dynamic" action rpg combat style in a dragon age game.
No one said anything about the combat being totally different. What they said was that they are making it work in a way that works just as well on console as it does on PC. There are many different games that do this without being whatever the hell it is you're insinuating with this point. Also, the fact that you said "in a dragon age" game like Dragon Age has well-established standards. It's an IP in its infancy with only ONE game to its credit. There are no hard-set standards yet. I'm going to go ahead and assume this is just a weak attempt at furthering your future attempts at comparing Dragon Age to Mass Effect.
"c)All plot from dragon age origins is gone. Its none or few conection
between dragon age origins and dragon age 2."
If I were speaking to you verbally I'd say "I'm going to say this really slow so you can understand it" because it seems you don't understand *why* Dragon Age: Origins is called Dragon Age: Origins. In Thedas, the system they use for dating is based on Ages. (e.g The Exalted Age). The Dragon Age is just the Age that this story took place in. That's why it wasn't called "The Blight" or something equally specific to the storyline. The fact that this next story takes place in the Dragon Age gives it every bit of relevancy to the title. That said, your assertion that there is "few connections" to the story from the first game is completely unfounded. We already know the character was at Lothering. We also know Morrigan and/or Flemeth will be returning. Beyond that we have no idea what is going to be in the story. You have no basis to claim there is no direct link to the story in the first game. In fact, all evidence that exists points to the exact opposite of this. Again, terrible point.
"d)Turning into Dragon Effect. This game is gonna use mass effect diablog
system and problaby some more features turning Dragon age in to a Mass
Age."
Dialogue systems do not make a game what it is. Even if the dialogue system was identical to Mass Effect's (it won't be) this game is not Mass Effect. I don't really know what else to say on this point except to point out that Mass Effect's dialogue system exists because of the Paragon/Renegade morality system in place in the game. This system is not in place in Dragon Age, therefore, while there may end up being similarities, they will still be two completely different dialogue systems. It is more fair to compare the new dialogue system to Leliana's Song.
e) The most important reason is that Dragon age 2 is gonna be realeased
in 6-7 months. Dragon age origins taked bioware 6 years of desing. And
now dragon age 2, 6-7 months?. OPEN YOUR EYES Mike Hawkee lovers, this
is WRONG.
The fact that you seem to believe this game just started development is laughable. Even if the game *does* hit shelves exactly when predicted (which I'm willing to bet it won't) it has clearly been in development for a long period of time. What you see as far as screenshots and read as far as info will change between now and release fairly drastically. All you're doing is taking a very limited amount of information and filling in whatever you want in the multitudes of blanks that exist in what we currently know.
In conclusion: you have no idea what you're talking about.
Modifié par Narreneth, 13 juillet 2010 - 01:10 .
Retour en haut
.
)! I am angry over the fact that it's coming out too soon! Holy cow, BioWare isn't EA sports who decides to throw a sequel to a horrible game next year! BioWare isn't EA whoever made all those horrible, horrible Need for Speeds since 2003. So what, by 2020 we are seeing "DRAGON AGE 11!!!!!" ??
