Does the no-reload thread belong in the "official campaigns" forum or are supposed to use Dark-Lauron's thread for that?
Where should the no-reload thread be posted?
Débuté par
corey_russell
, juil. 13 2010 08:11
#1
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 08:11
#2
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 08:13
Official campaigns I guess. My group (see signature below) was only a bridge between the old forums and the social site. With the forums up, it's practically useless now. Of course, if someone wishes, it's still open for posting.
#3
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 08:19
Definitely "official campaigns". We want our no-reload feats on proud display so the plebs may be suitably impressed
#4
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 08:47
Well spoken Irrbloss!
#5
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 08:59
Ok, very good. I have a no-reload dwarven fighter in BG 2 at the moment and his chance of completing his run before the old forums close is close to zero. Just way too much content in BG 2 to breeze through, plus when I post updates like to include pictures of the interesting parts (like the PC being clobbered) because they seem more fun to read that way, though of course takes more time for me to do so.
ONE MORE QUESTION:
Forgot to ask, should the no-reload thread be a single thread for everyone like before, or separate for each run like Dark-Lauron's group?
ONE MORE QUESTION:
Forgot to ask, should the no-reload thread be a single thread for everyone like before, or separate for each run like Dark-Lauron's group?
Modifié par corey_russell, 13 juillet 2010 - 09:04 .
#6
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 09:11
I'd say it's easier to have them all in a single thread but that's just my opinion.
#7
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 09:13
If you start a new no-reload thread, make sure to link back to the last thread in the old forum.
(Note: For some reason I can’t use the text editor in Opera.
)
(Note: For some reason I can’t use the text editor in Opera.
#8
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 09:14
Yeah, a single thread is probably the most appropriate. It's the "official campaigns" forum and not the "no-reload" forum, after all.
#9
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 09:22
You mean a single thread for both games? Well, I guess that could work, yes. Although it would get a bit filled much faster. Your call though
#10
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 09:30
No. I meant like we currently do it; one thread for BG1 and another for BG2, each in their own forum. Hopefully we can get semi-regular locks on them though (say, every 50 pages or so), so we don't get those humongous monster threads.
Modifié par Irrbloss, 13 juillet 2010 - 09:32 .
#11
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 09:36
I don't know. Have you seen the Mass Effect Tali thread? The thing has 9200+ pages... which means over 230 thousand posts in one single thread. I guess one could decide to start reading that thread when he's 10 and not finish it until death.
#12
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 09:45
But maybe no one in that thread ever thought to ask the moderator to lock it so they could create a new one. : )
#13
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 09:52
I think this is more a fault of the moderators. They should at least check back once in a while and take action.
#14
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 09:58
Screenshots? Stories? Where can I find all this old beauty
?
#15
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 10:00
My guess that whoever even TRIES to lock the Talimancer source no.1 thread, that specific moderator is a dead man. You ever met those fanatics? No, wait, fanatics is a compliment. Lunatics perhaps. You say Tali is ok, they kill you... literally.
Still, we have still our comprehensive, dare I say, best moderator of the forums, and I guess we could ask him to lock the thread every N posts.
Still, we have still our comprehensive, dare I say, best moderator of the forums, and I guess we could ask him to lock the thread every N posts.
#16
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 10:01
Okidoki! Welcome and yes, a single thread for the BG1 and another for the BG2 no-reloads will be fine. I'll try to lock 'em up for a refresh whenever y'all feel they are getting overwhelmed.
#17
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 10:33
Another question is, do we start at 1 again or go on with the 25th no-reload thread?
#18
Posté 13 juillet 2010 - 11:21
Guess whoever makes the no-reload thread first will get the final say, but I don't personally why not to call it "25th No-Reload", especially if that's the way it's been done since the 1st one. I don't see a reason not to continue traditions as long as they aren't harmful.
#19
Posté 14 juillet 2010 - 06:16
Irrbloss wrote...
Definitely "official campaigns". We want our no-reload feats on proud display so the plebs may be suitably impressed
Hi! Pleb here.
Modifié par Seagloom, 14 juillet 2010 - 06:18 .
#20
Posté 14 juillet 2010 - 08:05
Somewhere where I wouldn't see it.
What? I gotta resist somehow!
What? I gotta resist somehow!





Retour en haut







