I know this sounds silly but it would be really handy for groups if you guys added an update news to for leaders of groups this way when a leader makes an announcement everyone will get a small update to let them know what the leader was asking and this way a leader doesn't have to waist posting in a discussion box. Is this even possible?
A new feature to add to groups.
Débuté par
Tooneyman
, juil. 14 2010 08:23
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 14 juillet 2010 - 09:54
Hel
-
- Members
- 420 messages
The groups are current missing the current functionality:
- Sub-forums in the group's discussion forum.
- Ability to add a usable link in the group's description.
- Gametags under the members' portraits.
- Signatures are apparently disabled altogether, which isn't bad per se.
- When creating or editing a post there's no editor available, i.e. no formatting or smilies, unless you know the codes.
- Editing a post has a dodgy workflow to it:
-- First you press edit.
-- Then you change your post.
-- When finished you click outside of the textbox, to submit the changes.
-- And finally you have to press CTRL+F5 to get the page to render properly.
Those are the ones I can think of at the moment. :innocent:
- Sub-forums in the group's discussion forum.
- Ability to add a usable link in the group's description.
- Gametags under the members' portraits.
- Signatures are apparently disabled altogether, which isn't bad per se.
- When creating or editing a post there's no editor available, i.e. no formatting or smilies, unless you know the codes.
- Editing a post has a dodgy workflow to it:
-- First you press edit.
-- Then you change your post.
-- When finished you click outside of the textbox, to submit the changes.
-- And finally you have to press CTRL+F5 to get the page to render properly.
Those are the ones I can think of at the moment. :innocent:
Modifié par Helekanalaith, 14 juillet 2010 - 10:05 .
#4
Posté 20 juillet 2010 - 07:56
TemplariDM
-
- Members
- 14 messages
Add to the list that the spell check for most windows systems that auto checks in websites is not working or enabled or something.
#5
Posté 20 juillet 2010 - 07:59
Tooneyman
-
- Members
- 4 416 messages
TemplariDM wrote...
Add to the list that the spell check for most windows systems that auto checks in websites is not working or enabled or something.
Yeah, but then you have to worry about cookies. I like Biowares site because it doesn't have tracking cookies. My virus system to this day hasn't given me one pop-up yet of cookie danger which I like. I hate cookies they are virus potiental so maybe lets not worry about that. Bioware already has a feature to edit what you wrote. Nothing wrong with going to another link and checking the spelling there.
#6
Posté 22 juillet 2010 - 09:07
TemplariDM
-
- Members
- 14 messages
Ok, For blog's
I think the search is defaulting to the search that does Any one of the words instead of all the phrase.
Also 10 results seems to be the maximum which in itself is flawed, what if the one your looking for isn't in the 10?? AND because its searching for the keywords using an -any- of the words, rather then -all- the words its flawed.
Example. I search for Epic I get 10 results
I search for Epic Anglashell I get 10 results because they have epic in there but not necessarily the word Anglashell
I search for Anglashell and I get 1 result.
I think the search is defaulting to the search that does Any one of the words instead of all the phrase.
Also 10 results seems to be the maximum which in itself is flawed, what if the one your looking for isn't in the 10?? AND because its searching for the keywords using an -any- of the words, rather then -all- the words its flawed.
Example. I search for Epic I get 10 results
I search for Epic Anglashell I get 10 results because they have epic in there but not necessarily the word Anglashell
I search for Anglashell and I get 1 result.
#7
Posté 23 juillet 2010 - 02:30
Tooneyman
-
- Members
- 4 416 messages
Yeah, I know some times I search a word and get nothing at all. Even though I'm looking for a crap through all the forms. This does need to be looked at.
