55 réponses à ce sujet

[Wishpig]

odiedragon wrote...

I've heard that Morrigan's story will be continued, but that's been more rumor than anything.  I haven't heard anywhere that the other characters will come back.

I know what I need to know about DA2.  It will be a new story.  Some of our decisions will impact it, but not in any meaningful way.

No we heard morrigan's story will continue in some form from the devs.

We also heard old characters will come back... from the devs.

Niether are rumors, and obviously you do not know what you need to know about DA2. As either most of your main points are false or nobody knows yet. Being you've tended to be wrong or jumping to conclusions how in the world do you know what you need to know when you obviously know so little?

Whatever, pass your judgements, just don't spread this false s*** around. There's enough people raging over what they don't know or off some rumors... don't add to the fire please.

And yes you don't need to answer every response. But your clearly ignoreing some posts with damn good responses... when you make an OP and when people respond directly to you, don't wave them off because they make you look bad.

It's good you admitted where you were wrong, most people can't do that. But by your own admission you admit how f*ed up your first post was, yet you also admit how you feel/your attitude remains the same. That is not right. Many of the problems you have with the game have been proven false or unjust. That SHOULD change your opinion if only a little. If I say I HATE DA2 BECAUSE I HAVE TO PLAY AS AN ELF... and am then told you play as a human... I should shut my trap and admit I judged to harshly. I don't have to have a 180 turn in opinion, but I should admit I was wrong and be more open.

Modifié par Wishpig, 15 juillet 2010 - 05:33 .

[jjkrogs]

Regardless of where things are going now, anyone who suggests the title "Origins" meant something other than the origin of your PC in a greater story, then you weren't paying attention to the constant promotion of the concept pre-release.



Now it may have melded itself into the 'origin' of the franchise, thus giving BioWare an escape route into new characters and stories, but I have no doubt this was a significant change in concept from their initial intentions.



The question is 'why', and no one knows, nor likely will we ever know why they went in another direction. But ME2's success would probably be my first suspect.

[Narreneth]

Wishpig wrote...

In Exile wrote...

The game was called Dragon Age. That was the title it was designed under. That was the title it was announced under. That was the title that we who followed the game for four years.

It was changed to Dragon Age: Origins. Bioware never explicitly said why. We debated whether it was because it was the start of the Dragon Age story, an emphasis on the gameplay feature, etc.

But at no point was the game designed under the auspices of "Origin" as an origin story for the Warden.

Godd*** this thread is full of so much failure it hurts my skull.

Quick side note though- It was called Origins because a major selling point was the multiple origins at the start of the game. Jesus... it's not any deeper then that.

They told us before the game was released that Dragon Age: Origin's was not the start of some continueing story line like in ME... or at least not necessarly. They told us not to expect a constant single story like.

This thread is full of failure because you have no freakin idea what will happen in DA:2. Infact some of your points are flat out incorrect. Such as Morrigan... they told us her story WILL BE ADRESSED. They told us characters WILL RETURN from DA:O. Jesus put 2 and 2 together would you. If she doesn't appear in DA:2 she will appear at some point.

It's clear you've done little no no research on what information the devs have been telling us. Most of your conclusions are either unknowible at this point or false.

Stoping wasteing space.

Other side note- OP, I love how your picking and chosing what you respond to so as not to admit how horribly wrong you were/are.

I love you and I want to run away to Paris with you.

[Jimmy Fury]

I responded to this (the OP) on another thread but I see you've moved to your own so I will do it once again. Mind you I'll be cutting it down to the very core of my point because I don't feel like copying and pasting.

I fully respect your stance and I can understand why you feel the way you do. With that said I have only one question.
What we know, for an absolute fact, about the plot for DA2 is this:
Refugee flees lothering, becomes champion of Kirkwall.
That's it. We have some tidbits of info about Kirkwall but that's setting and we have no idea how it relates to the plot. We know Flemeth comes back but, again, not how it relates to the plot.
So here's my question:
Based on the only information we know at this point, how do you come to the conclusion that none of those plot points you mentioned will be involved?

[Bugzehat]

odiedragon wrote...

You can be angry over not getting what you want without feeling that you were owed it in the first place.  I even said in my original post that it was irrational.  It's still how I feel, however.

I was hoping for somethign different than what we're being told about the direction DA2 is leaning.  I can be angry about that without having entitlement issues.

What really angers me is, as I've touched on already, is the "Sorry, but you're an idiot" that's so prevalant on this forum.  I'm not even sure why I'm still posting here honestly.  An inability to just let go I suppose.

You said that being angry was irrational, yeah, but you've spent the entire thread trying to defend it. You've consistently presented your concerns as justification for being angry -- the point being that It's All BioWare's Fault. "It's just how I feel" -- fine, but what are we supposed to do about that? All we can do is tell you you're being irrational, which you apparently agree with, but when we do that you take offense and think you're being called an idiot.

Like I said, disappointment is fine. Discussion of your concerns for the sequel is fine. Being angry, though, either makes you look entitled or irrational, and neither of those things is going to help you win an argument.

[Stanley Woo]

We've already got a thread discussing DA2 being different than DAOP. Please take your conversation there. We don't need everyone with a strong opinion creating their own new, separate thread on this. Thank you.



End of line.