Maybe but I'm still applying sunscreen on my skin everytime I have to go outside.iTomes wrote...
oh hey global warming! like that topic... one of the biggest political hypes of all time imo and only created for politicians to make some PR^^
Who wants to bet male romance options will be heterosexual only?
#751
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:21
#752
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:22
Tirigon wrote...
joriandrake wrote...
Exactly, if both partners know what they do, are mature enough to understand it, and neither of them are forced to it then it is not bad, with exception of the danger that their child may not be normal if one is born, this is atleast not a danger to homosexual couples and can be more at ease then them.
Not to mention, sometimes love just happens between relatives without their knowledge, this is especially true if they never met eachother before and only got to know about being relatives after they fell in love, or in a more dramatic situation: when they sign the marriage papers. Sometimes even then it may not be known despite having the same surname because there are many families with the same surname without being relatives, expecially in europe, names like "Smith" or "Baker" which came from the occupation of ancestors during the medievals are a good example of such misleading surnames.
Ok, maybe I overreacted a bit. But after I heard you talking about "abnormal" homosexuals I immediately thought you think on the line of "they´ll all burn in helll, these abominations".... Sadly, Ive read enough posters here who did indeed think like that so it´s not as far-fetched as one might think.
I only meant with the word "abnormal" non-normal, I didn't intend it to be an insult and I didn't find a better word to describe what I meant to say, I apologize if it caused confusion, but I have to say you preople reacted not that nicely neither, more like a pack of worgs
I guess this is again something like the word "nig ger" being an insult in english (except in weird cases where black people say it to black people) while in my language "néger" is not an insult but the only existing word to describe "black people"
EDIT: eh, it actually got censured
Modifié par joriandrake, 21 juillet 2010 - 04:23 .
#753
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:24
Tirigon wrote...
joriandrake wrote...
Exactly, if both partners know what they do, are mature enough to understand it, and neither of them are forced to it then it is not bad, with exception of the danger that their child may not be normal if one is born, this is atleast not a danger to homosexual couples and can be more at ease then them.
Not to mention, sometimes love just happens between relatives without their knowledge, this is especially true if they never met eachother before and only got to know about being relatives after they fell in love, or in a more dramatic situation: when they sign the marriage papers. Sometimes even then it may not be known despite having the same surname because there are many families with the same surname without being relatives, expecially in europe, names like "Smith" or "Baker" which came from the occupation of ancestors during the medievals are a good example of such misleading surnames.
Ok, maybe I overreacted a bit. But after I heard you talking about "abnormal" homosexuals I immediately thought you think on the line of "they´ll all burn in helll, these abominations".... Sadly, Ive read enough posters here who did indeed think like that so it´s not as far-fetched as one might think.
I don't think there's anything wrong with the term abnormal, it's just that it's nearly always used in a loaded fashion, one can be an abnormal painter & decorater in that you may not fit the definition society places on painters & decoraters?
Modifié par Bobad, 21 juillet 2010 - 04:24 .
#754
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:26
I'm black and in most cases black people say "nig ga" not "nig ger". But anyway we are talking about global warming now.joriandrake wrote...
Tirigon wrote...
joriandrake wrote...
Exactly, if both partners know what they do, are mature enough to understand it, and neither of them are forced to it then it is not bad, with exception of the danger that their child may not be normal if one is born, this is atleast not a danger to homosexual couples and can be more at ease then them.
Not to mention, sometimes love just happens between relatives without their knowledge, this is especially true if they never met eachother before and only got to know about being relatives after they fell in love, or in a more dramatic situation: when they sign the marriage papers. Sometimes even then it may not be known despite having the same surname because there are many families with the same surname without being relatives, expecially in europe, names like "Smith" or "Baker" which came from the occupation of ancestors during the medievals are a good example of such misleading surnames.
Ok, maybe I overreacted a bit. But after I heard you talking about "abnormal" homosexuals I immediately thought you think on the line of "they´ll all burn in helll, these abominations".... Sadly, Ive read enough posters here who did indeed think like that so it´s not as far-fetched as one might think.
I only meant with the word "abnormal" non-normal, I didn't intend it to be an insult and I didn't find a better word to describe what I meant to say, I apologize if it caused confusion, but I have to say you preople reacted not that nicely neither, more like a pack of worgs
I guess this is again something like the word "nig ger" being an insult in english (except in weird cases where black people say it to black people) while in my language "néger" is not an insult but the only existing word to describe "black people"
EDIT: eh, it actually got censured
EDIT: Wow that was censored as well lol.
Modifié par C9316, 21 juillet 2010 - 04:27 .
#755
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:27
I guess this is again something like the word "nig ger" being an insult in english (except in weird cases where black people say it to black people) while in my language "néger" is not an insult but the only existing word to describe "black people"
EDIT: eh, it actually got censured"
ahhh now i start hating the language barrier. see, in germany for example the word "abnormal" usually is quite negative (at least if you call a human abnormal).
#756
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:28
Bobad wrote...
Tirigon wrote...
joriandrake wrote...
Exactly, if both partners know what they do, are mature enough to understand it, and neither of them are forced to it then it is not bad, with exception of the danger that their child may not be normal if one is born, this is atleast not a danger to homosexual couples and can be more at ease then them.
Not to mention, sometimes love just happens between relatives without their knowledge, this is especially true if they never met eachother before and only got to know about being relatives after they fell in love, or in a more dramatic situation: when they sign the marriage papers. Sometimes even then it may not be known despite having the same surname because there are many families with the same surname without being relatives, expecially in europe, names like "Smith" or "Baker" which came from the occupation of ancestors during the medievals are a good example of such misleading surnames.
Ok, maybe I overreacted a bit. But after I heard you talking about "abnormal" homosexuals I immediately thought you think on the line of "they´ll all burn in helll, these abominations".... Sadly, Ive read enough posters here who did indeed think like that so it´s not as far-fetched as one might think.
I don't think there's anything wrong with the term abnormal, it's just that it's nearly always used in a loaded fashion, one can be an abnormal painter & decorater in that you may not fit the definition society places on painters & decoraters?
I myself tend to park my car in an abnormal way, police doesn't like it (my wallet neither)
#757
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:31
iTomes wrote...
"I only meant with the word "abnormal" non-normal, I didn't intend it to be an insult and I didn't find a better word to describe what I meant to say, I apologize if it caused confusion, but I have to say you preople reacted not that nicely neither, more like a pack of worgs
I guess this is again something like the word "nig ger" being an insult in english (except in weird cases where black people say it to black people) while in my language "néger" is not an insult but the only existing word to describe "black people"
EDIT: eh, it actually got censured"
ahhh now i start hating the language barrier. see, in germany for example the word "abnormal" usually is quite negative (at least if you call a human abnormal).
hm, I didn't speak or read german in a while except for playing venetica, but I think the best word would be anders/different for this case then
#758
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:34
If the canon Hawke is straight that doesnt mean you wont get your gay romance. And I dont see the point about complaining about Zeveran his character was done great I believe and I dont think he is of any stereotype beside the "elves are all backstabbing wussies"
#759
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:35
#760
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:36
Blackbaron15 wrote...
Ugh I'v seen so many threads like this please just suck it up.
If the canon Hawke is straight that doesnt mean you wont get your gay romance. And I dont see the point about complaining about Zeveran his character was done great I believe and I dont think he is of any stereotype beside the "elves are all backstabbing wussies"
oh boy, you don't know what you walked into
#761
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:37
#762
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:41
RETURN FIRE!!!iTomes wrote...
TAKE COVER!!
#763
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:43
#764
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:46
joriandrake wrote...
Is that an Advanced Plasma Rifle?
Bobad wrote...
Perhaps but the inclusion of a cloak/anorkak should keep all happy.
?
#765
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:52
#766
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:53
iTomes wrote...
well, this thread reached a whole new level of scientific greatness. neurologists from all countrys are uniting to discover the so called "negative brightness". it is a well known scientific fact that making a bunch of clever people reading this thread will make them lose every mental skill they ever had. the army included itself into this amazing new project, following rumors theyre working on a whole new mass-destruction weapon, aka the "stupidity-bomb".
in the footsteps of Spaceballs!
#767
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:56
#768
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:58
joriandrake wrote...
iTomes wrote...
well, this thread reached a whole new level of scientific greatness. neurologists from all countrys are uniting to discover the so called "negative brightness". it is a well known scientific fact that making a bunch of clever people reading this thread will make them lose every mental skill they ever had. the army included itself into this amazing new project, following rumors theyre working on a whole new mass-destruction weapon, aka the "stupidity-bomb".
in the footsteps of Spaceballs!
Spaceballs? I love Spaceballs, they are so soft and fluffy.
#769
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 04:59
Pointless, the stupidity cannot be stoped, people would either go to a new topic, or wait until the next "Will there be gaymance-thread" pops up, which takes usually less than 24 hours.Malira wrote...
... That's it, I'm voting for closing down this thread...
#770
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 05:00
Wittand25 wrote...
Pointless, the stupidity cannot be stoped, people would either go to a new topic, or wait until the next "Will there be gaymance-thread" pops up, which takes usually less than 24 hours.Malira wrote...
... That's it, I'm voting for closing down this thread...
and they called me offensive
Modifié par joriandrake, 21 juillet 2010 - 05:05 .
#771
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 05:08
joriandrake wrote...
and they called me offensive
How's a slowpoke fruit in a forum about gay romances not stupid?
#772
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 05:10
#773
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 05:10
Malira wrote...
... That's it, I'm voting for closing down this thread...
awww.... bioware forums aren't a democracy silly
It's a strictly pagan theorcracy where Priestly (the trickster), Woo (lord of the hammer), Gloom (ender of all musics), and the other mods are our loving if occasionally maniacal gods
but i think we learned a few pages back that the gods have forsaken this particular thread.
#774
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 05:12
Malira wrote...
joriandrake wrote...
and they called me offensive
How's a slowpoke fruit in a forum about gay romances not stupid?
my comment was directed towards wittand's post
#775
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 05:12
What is offensive about my post ?joriandrake wrote...
Wittand25 wrote...
Pointless, the stupidity cannot be stoped, people would either go to a new topic, or wait until the next "Will there be gaymance-thread" pops up, which takes usually less than 24 hours.Malira wrote...
... That's it, I'm voting for closing down this thread...
and they called me offensive
This thread is stupid, that is a fact or do you want to argue about that ?
Homosexual romances are an important feature for part of the community,including myself, so a thread about them tends to be opened pretty fast if there is no open thread, another fact proven by the history of this forum.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




