Aller au contenu

Photo

Bioware and Lady Hawke and screenshots


372 réponses à ce sujet

#201
tmp7704

tmp7704
  • Members
  • 11 156 messages

Tirigon wrote...

I would go as far as to say that this kind of clothing is a sign of strength and freedom for women, opposed to the Burqua women have to wear in muslim countries.
Naked Skin = Freedom. Or what do you think why the hippies made mini skirts popular?
"Modest" clothing has always been a sign of oppression, while showing skin was a way to show freedom and power.

You are missing what's been continually pointed out -- when the outfit is created/enforced on the character by a male designer it tends to be viewed exactly as "oppressive" as these more covering clothes you mention. Because it has nothing to do with character exercising their "freedom" but a lot with a guy getting kick out of viewing a female the way he likes to see them.

Or to put it differently, do you think a woman who is wearing skimpy outfits because her boyfriend tells her to is "showing her freedom"?

Modifié par tmp7704, 18 juillet 2010 - 05:39 .


#202
Guest_slimgrin_*

Guest_slimgrin_*
  • Guests
Tirigon, I seem to remember you and another member derailing a thread while back, talking about sexual exploits. Something about thanksgiving and stamina...

Was that you?

Modifié par slimgrin, 18 juillet 2010 - 05:50 .


#203
HoonDing

HoonDing
  • Members
  • 3 012 messages

TMZuk wrote...

2. I assume you have heard of Joan'd Arc?

Joan of Arc didn't fight. She drove around on a horse parading with a banner. She was a symbol meant to inspire the French.

And, ironically, in the end she was burnt for 'heresy', i.e. wearing men's clothes. 

Modifié par virumor, 18 juillet 2010 - 05:47 .


#204
Saibh

Saibh
  • Members
  • 8 071 messages

Tirigon wrote...

Seriously, I start getting offended now. You´re just too dumb to see reason if it hits you on the head, right?

Your point comes down to "Skimpy armor sucks, and if you don´t agree you´re sexist and dumb!" and that´s it. Everything you said is just that, only with more words around.....:sick:


For the 4th time now:PREFER MY FEMALE CHARACTERS TO WEAR HEAVY PLATEMAIL.
Get it in your head after all, will you?

i am simply arguing against your whining and crying to see sexism where there is none. As a matter of fact many people like their characters and the NPCs to look slu7ty, and THAT`S WHY IT`S DONE. SEX SELLS! Ever heard of that? It´s the rule by which our economy works........

And fyi, I agree with your sentiment that it´s ridiculous if armor shrinks magically; I would go even further and say that armor shouldn´t change at all but instead there should be male and female versions of it.

What me annoys, though, is your godawful seriousness instead of taking it with humour. Can´t you just laugh about it, if it´s so ridiculous? No you can´t. You HAVE to accuse the devs who make such stuff and everyone who likes it of sexism..... Seriously, don´t you have better things to do than whine and cry?

Last but not least you should note that women are never shown in as inferior to men - on the contrary, these skimpy clothed warrior ladies are heroes who beat every man in just about everything. I would go as far as to say that this kind of clothing is a sign of strength and freedom for women, opposed to the Burqua women have to wear in muslim countries.
Naked Skin = Freedom. Or what do you think why the hippies made mini skirts popular?
"Modest" clothing has always been a sign of oppression, while showing skin was a way to show freedom and power.
Just for once, try looking at it like this.
And THIS is why I think it´s men who are discriminated in video games, not women.

Please be so nice and read this, and then think about it before you answer. I have not yet given up the hope you might understand after all.


And yet...no one here is seeing where you're not being sexist. So...again, you fail to see all the counterpoints I or others have raised and just charge on with you face towards the ground. Never once, not once, have I said that wearing skimpy clothing in an every day situation is ****ty and demeaning and bad. But in a fantasy RPG setting where these women are fighting for there lives, that's where the problem comes in. But, yet again, you don't bother to read, or at least are incapable of understand, my points. I've already mentioned this fact several times.

You, on the other hand, keep flipflopping between it being badass and cool for women to wear skimpy outfits, but now you evidently "prefer" for women to wear heavy plate.

Listen to yourself. You think "naked skin = freedom"? Are you stupid? It's not "naked skin" it's the choice to bare your skin. These women don't have a choice--and our women, when given the choice, often don't feel the need to take it to prove just how "free" they are.

It's always nice to lump jokes into a debate since it prevents other sides from being angry--but you're just being offensive. You're entire argument has been pigheaded and offensive. Several people have stepped into to point out why and somehow it isn't enough.

"And fyi, I agree with your sentiment that it´s ridiculous if armor
shrinks magically; I would go even further and say that armor shouldn´t
change at all but instead there should be male and female versions of
it."


This has been my point the whole time. You have directly argued against it. You just keep changing your mind, depending on which way the wind is blowing or something.

Never once have I said "Skimpy armor sucks, and if you don´t agree you´re sexist and dumb!"
I have said, repeatedly, that I accept its existence in most video games, I just think it's unrealistic and demeaning--it never makes me hate a game or stop playing it. Let me put it this way: I don't like, but I accept it. I, and many others, have brought up several points why skimpy armor is ridiculous.

However.


I am not boycotting these games. I am not screaming at the developers--certainly not BioWare's devs, as I've already pointed out their strengths and the respect they have--nor am I throwing hissy fits all over the board. This has to do with you thinking its realistic for women to wear skimpy armor on a battlefield. Not light armor. Not thin, meneuvarable, clingy leather that shows off their curves. Skimpy not there chain mail underwear is what you think is good.

Did I object to Morrigan's presence? Miranda's? Jack's? No. I understand their purpose and am absolutely a-okay with their outfits and personas. You're the one who decided to try and turn yourself into the victim. There is no victim here. It's not that tragic that video games do this. What's tragic is the way you think.

virumor wrote...

And, ironically, in the end she was burnt
for 'heresy', i.e. wearing men's clothes. 


Well. She was burnt because England needed an excuse to kill a powerful war leader. At least, that was the given reason. In any case Ferelden =/= medieval Europe.

#205
LiquidGrape

LiquidGrape
  • Members
  • 2 942 messages

Tirigon wrote...
[...] you should note that women are never shown in as inferior to men - on the contrary, these skimpy clothed warrior ladies are heroes who beat every man in just about everything.


...Within a context which at the same time renders them pleasure creatures; thus making these acts of strength seem more like vain attempts at justifying the incongruity of their design.

I would go as far as to say that this kind of clothing is a sign of strength and freedom for women, opposed to the Burqua women have to wear in muslim countries.


Interesting that you'd mention burquas.(which aren't exclusively a muslim phenomenon, by the way)
You are aware that some nations are actively attempting to prohibit women from wearing these garments? Liberation by means of further oppression. Freedom indeed.
I'm not saying I approve of the cultural perception that women need to "hide" their features; but neither do I approve of the notion that the amount of skin you've got on display is a direct manifestation of your independence.
It's a patriarchal delusion. In short: Women; get them tops off; it's for the sake of your human right to expose yourselves.


"Modest" clothing has always been a sign of oppression, while showing skin was a way to show freedom and power.


...or a means to convey submission and helplessness. It's a matter of perspective; something you ought to take into account if you are going to define the socio-sexual mechanics of clothing.

#206
Sol Nox

Sol Nox
  • Members
  • 503 messages

LiquidGrape wrote...
...or a means to convey submission and helplessness. It's a matter of perspective; something you ought to take into account if you are going to define the socio-sexual mechanics of clothing.

Or it's damn cold out and mama didn't raise no fool.

#207
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

slimgrin wrote...

Tirigon, I seem to remember you and another member derailing a thread while back, talking about sexual exploits. Something about thanksgiving and stamina...

Was that you?


I did once talk about sex, but it was in the "Nudity in Mass Effect" thread, and I don´t remember anything about thanksgiving and stamina.

So, unless someone hacked my account, no, that was not me.

#208
LiquidGrape

LiquidGrape
  • Members
  • 2 942 messages

ColeMR wrote...

Or it's damn cold out and mama didn't raise no fool.


Occam's razor. I like.

#209
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

tmp7704 wrote...


You are missing what's been continually pointed out -- when the outfit is created/enforced on the character by a male designer it tends to be viewed exactly as "oppressive" as these more covering clothes you mention. Because it has nothing to do with character exercising their "freedom" but a lot with a guy getting kick out of viewing a female the way he likes to see them.

Many designers are female.

Or to put it differently, do you think a woman who is wearing skimpy outfits because her boyfriend tells her to is "showing her freedom"?

No she isn´t.
However, I doubt a warrior princess who can kill 100 men easily is wearing skimpy clothes because her boyfriend forces her to do so. After all, she coud simply behead him:devil:




The Dark elves, for example, from Heroes of Might and Magic, of whom I posted pics a few pages ago, come from a society were the highest power belongs to women, and men are equal at best, if not inferior, to women.

Modifié par Tirigon, 18 juillet 2010 - 06:08 .


#210
Guest_slimgrin_*

Guest_slimgrin_*
  • Guests
 Burquas....:ph34r:

Now there's a way to explode a thread.

#211
Aryck the One

Aryck the One
  • Members
  • 1 265 messages

SirOccam wrote...

I imagine she'll look similar to Bethany (assuming that the one in the picture is indeed Bethany):
Image IPB

I don't think I'll customize Hawke's appearance. Personally I love that above picture. I think that is a great look. I love the hair, I love the tattoo (which you can't see in that pic but can elsewhere), I love the skin tone and the dark eyes and how well they match between the two characters.

With ME I didn't customize Shepard, but that was more because only the default seemed to look somewhat natural. I dunno, anything else just seemed...off. But with this...it's because I specifically want my Hawke to look like that.


Wierd, that girl looks a lot like Katara from Avatar:The Last Airbender TV show. The hair style is exactly the same, fro what I can see in this screenshot...

#212
Quercus

Quercus
  • Members
  • 592 messages
Enough said.

Image IPB

Modifié par Shiroukai, 18 juillet 2010 - 06:20 .


#213
Sol Nox

Sol Nox
  • Members
  • 503 messages

Aryck1095 V2 wrote...
Wierd, that girl looks a lot like Katara from Avatar:The Last Airbender TV show. The hair style is exactly the same, fro what I can see in this screenshot...


I'm going to let you in on a secret: Long brown hair was around long before that cartoon.
Historically speaking, at least a a year or so, eh.

#214
Estelindis

Estelindis
  • Members
  • 3 699 messages
Don't have time to read the whole thread at this exact minute, so just posting this in case it hasn't already been posted:



Lady Hawke by Aimo

#215
Finiffa

Finiffa
  • Members
  • 470 messages
All this discussion about clothing has driven us away from the question the OP has posed:

Why is it that we AGAIN (see ME2) only get to see the standard male Hawke and the female Hawke AGAIN seems nothing but an afterthought from the PR-departement?  It is really disappointing considering that the writers did a good job in Dragon Age about giving male/female equality and DA:O had a neutral outset.......

Even if you do not like the looks of male Hawke it is clear that BioWare has put effort in creating him. If this goes the ME2-way then again we will not see an equally created femHawke. And again female gamers that do not follow these forums but only look in shops for games will think there is no femHawke...

I never was aware there was femShep because I did not follow the ME2-forums. My husband bought ME2 and I found out there was one after all.....Image IPB

To have SOME screenshots and SOME footage featuring a femHawke would really be appreciated BioWare!

#216
Saibh

Saibh
  • Members
  • 8 071 messages

Tirigon wrote...

tmp7704 wrote...


You are missing what's been continually pointed out -- when the outfit is created/enforced on the character by a male designer it tends to be viewed exactly as "oppressive" as these more covering clothes you mention. Because it has nothing to do with character exercising their "freedom" but a lot with a guy getting kick out of viewing a female the way he likes to see them.

Many designers are female.


Some designers are female, and I promise you the reason they're being told to make armor like that is to appeal to the male demographic, not because they thought it would be "realistic". I'm not saying they're wrong to, I'm just saying that's damn stupid logic.

However, I doubt a warrior princess who can kill 100 men easily is wearing skimpy clothes because her boyfriend forces her to do so. After all, she coud simply behead him:devil:




The Dark elves, for example, from Heroes of Might and Magic, of whom I posted pics a few pages ago, come from a society were the highest power belongs to women, and men are equal at best, if not inferior, to women.



Again, you missed the point! It's the fact that female gamer doesn't get a choice in what she's wearing. The devs designed armors that are skimpy and we have the choice between going naked or wearing that, guess what we'll pick? There is no reason, beyond appealing to men, for plate armor to only cover her naughty bits when it doesn't do the same on men.

The Dark Elves thing was a choice on the male designers to make women who dress like that. The gamer has no choice one whether or not they choose to wear that type of armor. And, again, why should the exact same armor model change? If the Dark Elves choose to dress like that in an every-day clothing sense, okay. But it's ridiculous they wear armor that looks like that.

#217
Finiffa

Finiffa
  • Members
  • 470 messages

Estelindis wrote...

Don't have time to read the whole thread at this exact minute, so just posting this in case it hasn't already been posted:

Lady Hawke by Aimo

Thanks for the link!!

#218
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages
[quote]Saibh wrote...

You, on the other hand, keep flipflopping between it being badass and cool for women to wear skimpy outfits, but now you evidently "prefer" for women to wear heavy plate.[/quote]
Let me elaborate: Yes, I think warriors in skimpy outfits are badass, and I´d be more scared if an almost-naked girl with a bloodstained sword tries to kill me then if a medieval knight does.
I prefer my characters to wear heavy armor for the simple reason that I think it looks better.
I know, I´m strange in that aspect, but I find these metal bikinis terribly ugly, while a nice platemail like the one I posted before looks great.

[quote]Listen to yourself. You think "naked skin = freedom"? Are you stupid? It's not "naked skin" it's the choice to bare your skin. These women don't have a choice--and our women, when given the choice, often don't feel the need to take it to prove just how "free" they are.[/quote]
For the hippies, the right to show skin (or to be completely naked:innocent:) WAS freedom, yes. Of course, choice matters.
Skimpy armor in games WOULD be sexist if the heroine was forced to wear it by a man. Alas, that is not so. She wears it because she wants.

[quote]It's always nice to lump jokes into a debate since it prevents other sides from being angry--but you're just being offensive. You're entire argument has been pigheaded and offensive. Several people have stepped into to point out why and somehow it isn't enough.[/quote]
I did not mean to offend. I can´t help, though, if you find opposite opinions offensive.

[quote][quote]"And fyi, I agree with your sentiment that it´s ridiculous if armor
shrinks magically; I would go even further and say that armor shouldn´t
change at all but instead there should be male and female versions of
it."[/quote]

This has been my point the whole time. You have directly argued against it. You just keep changing your mind, depending on which way the wind is blowing or something.[/quote]
No i have NOT argued against that. I have argued against the statement revealing "armor" is generally ridiculous. I said multiple times that it should not change.
I don´t find it offensive, though, if it changes. it´s better than what happens if a man wears Morrigan´s robes, for example. (The entire body is invisible).

[quote]Never once have I said "Skimpy armor sucks, and if you don´t agree you´re sexist and dumb!"
I have said, repeatedly, that I accept its existence in most video games, I just think it's unrealistic and demeaning--it never makes me hate a game or stop playing it. Let me put it this way: I don't like, but I accept it. I, and many others, have brought up several points why skimpy armor is ridiculous. [/quote]
So why am I sexist? If it´s not because I disagreed with you?

[quote]However I am not boycotting these games. I am not screaming at the developers--certainly not BioWare's devs, as I've already pointed out their strengths and the respect they have--nor am I throwing hissy fits all over the board. This has to do with you thinking its realistic for women to wear skimpy armor on a battlefield. Not light armor. Not thin, meneuvarable, clingy leather that shows off their curves. Skimpy not there chain mail underwear is what you think is good. [/quote]
Please, it´s a FANTASY GAME. NOT a history simulator. And if it fits to the story, then yes, it´s good.
If it doesnt, then I agree, it´s sh!t.

[quote]Did I object to Morrigan's presence? Miranda's? Jack's? No. I understand their purpose and am absolutely a-okay with their outfits and personas. You're the one who decided to try and turn yourself into the victim. There is no victim here. It's not that tragic that video games do this. What's tragic is the way you think.[/quote]
I have "turned myself into a victim" because you did it first. You (or maybe not you specifically but someone else who posted) called it sexist and said skimpy armor objectifies women. Thus, this person has turned herself in a victim. I did the same to show how stupid it is.
Apparently it worked, as you find my actions dumb:devil:

[quote][quote]virumor wrote...

And, ironically, in the end she was burnt
for 'heresy', i.e. wearing men's clothes. 

[/quote]

Well. She was burnt because England needed an excuse to kill a powerful war leader. At least, that was the given reason. In any case Ferelden =/= medieval Europe.
[/quote][/quote]
In any case, Joan d´Arc was a great woman who deserves our respect. But she was an exception, not the rule. Her fate is not representative for medieval women any more than Elizabeth Bathory´s fate is, who drunk the blood of 100s of virgins to keep her beauty.

#219
Quercus

Quercus
  • Members
  • 592 messages

Estelindis wrote...

Don't have time to read the whole thread at this exact minute, so just posting this in case it hasn't already been posted:

Lady Hawke by Aimo


Darn, tobad she isn't wearing a chainmail bikini.
Well, just have to wait for art like that to show up.

#220
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

LiquidGrape wrote...

Interesting that you'd mention burquas.(which aren't exclusively a muslim phenomenon, by the way)
You are aware that some nations are actively attempting to prohibit women from wearing these garments? Liberation by means of further oppression. Freedom indeed.



Indeed, you are probably referring to France (or are there more countries doing this?). It is stupid to prohibit a certain style of clothing, especially since in the same countries it´s forbidden to be naked in public.

But, politics is sadly a big No-no on these boards, so let´s skip this or PM me.:police:

#221
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

Estelindis wrote...

Don't have time to read the whole thread at this exact minute, so just posting this in case it hasn't already been posted:

Lady Hawke by Aimo


Thanks for the link.

Aimo´s art is great.

#222
tmelange

tmelange
  • Members
  • 546 messages

Tirigon wrote...

tmelange wrote...

Better to argue that the only thing that actually matters in-game is whether *whatever* a character is wearing generates the proper defense score, whether it's a cloak or a bikini. Internal consistency is what matters, and if the game designers have created a world where women wear scraps of armor into battle, that's the world in which we all play. Of course, that doesn't mean that someone can't argue that the internal consistency around a particular choice makes little practical sense and is, in fact, driven by concerns outside of the game's internal setting. A design objection doesn't necessarily have to be a feminist issue, though, obviously, it has gender and sexist underpinings that can't be denied.


I agree with this 100%, and I think it is valid to criticize the chainmail bikini armor because it is ridiculous that it offers protection. But this is a criticism of the game mechanics - I could also criticize that rogues can sneak without penalty while wearing full plate armor, and this would also be valid.

But there is no reason to see sexism where there is none.


I think you can play the game and have two, equally valid, views about the cause and effect of certain design choices.

I could (and often do) play a female character and figure: If I can kick your ass while running around practically naked looking like a playboy bunny, cool. :)) In a lot of instances (and sometimes when dealing with men) sexuality is as good a weapon as anything. It might not bother me in a game that the reason why my character is designed this way isn't to empower me or to improve my gaming experience but because, as you said, sex sells (mostly for men), and women are the ones who are the usual sex objects.

However, it is equally valid for a female to play a female character and say: Wait a minute. Why do I have to play as if I have no common sense? Why do I have to be the over-ripe piece of eyecandy that has no ability to choose to wear something that might better protect me but will also hide my "assets"? I want my charcater to make as much sense to *me* as a male character makes to him. Because the developers are often objectifying the female character for the benefit of male players and the design is imposed upon the female player (rather than it being her choice to clothe or unclothe), it becomes an issue of gender inequality and sexism.

IMHO, I don't think you should discount one type of analysis in favor of another or spend too much time arguing that men are the real victims in the equation.

Of course, I suppose men could complain about design choices and sexism too. Why do most male heroes have to be tall, good-looking, straight, white, slim, muscular, American-ish etc. etc. Lots to argue about. LOL I guess a game developer can only do what it thinks will sell at the end of the day.

#223
Quercus

Quercus
  • Members
  • 592 messages
I hope Bioware will make some of the female armour look like something like this.

Image IPB

#224
RogueWriter3201

RogueWriter3201
  • Members
  • 1 276 messages

Estelindis wrote...

Don't have time to read the whole thread at this exact minute, so just posting this in case it hasn't already been posted:

Lady Hawke by Aimo


Well, dang it. I was just checking the forum to see if someone had posted a link to Aimo's outstanding Female Hawke; you beat me to it. (Snaps fingers) Well, just glad to see it's up. Given the heated debate this thread has sparked, it might be worth mentioning that Aimo has demonstraited a talent for depicting Female Dragon Age Heroes dressed to look both feminine (spelling? sorry), while mainting a realistic degree of armor and shielding. Also, they tend to look really quite Bad Ass. So, for those who think Fem Heroes need to be *barely* covered to be found appealing by guys who appreciate the female form, I point you in the direction of one of the most popular Artists not just on DeviantArt, but among the Dragon Age fan-base. An artist who was commmisioned by both BioWare and David Gaider himself.
Image IPB

#225
Tirigon

Tirigon
  • Members
  • 8 573 messages

Saibh wrote...

Again, you missed the point! It's the fact that female gamer doesn't get a choice in what she's wearing. The devs designed armors that are skimpy and we have the choice between going naked or wearing that, guess what we'll pick? There is no reason, beyond appealing to men, for plate armor to only cover her naughty bits when it doesn't do the same on men.


Finally we get to the point!

YOU don´t like it. And, this is your good right and a sentiment I fully understand. I agree 100% that there should be alternative outfits. I think it´s a valid criticism to want more possible choices how your char looks.
I do NOT think it´s valid to criticize such outfits as sexist; but as long as you don´t do that I fully support you.

On the other hand, the same goes for men. I would have loved to let Loghain fight in Stringtanga and waist-free shirt just for the lulz[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/devil.png[/smilie]

The Dark Elves thing was a choice on the male designers to make women who dress like that. The gamer has no choice one whether or not they choose to wear that type of armor. And, again, why should the exact same armor model change? If the Dark Elves choose to dress like that in an every-day clothing sense, okay. But it's ridiculous they wear armor that looks like that.

They do it for religious reasons, and because their fighting style consists in spells and attacking from the shadows so that the enemy is dead before he can hurt them (= no need for armor).
Now, I would really like to know whether the person who designed that was a man or a woman.
Unfortunately, you might just be right....