280 réponses à ce sujet

[bcooper56]

I pray to god they are console screen shots.

What is wrong with
those god awful environments? Those are seriously some of the ugliest
environments I've ever seen.



I will say that I don't mind the human designs even if they are more
stylistic, but what in the hell were they thinking with the enemy
design?



That's why the enemies and environments are so
ridiculously spiky and lacking detail to make it seem more like an art
drawing.

Modifié par bcooper56, 19 juillet 2010 - 03:05 .

[andar91]

David Gaider said that in his opinion, the graphics already look better than they do in those screenshots. The desert threw me off too, but it might not be that bad when we see it with more current graphics.

[bcooper56]

andar91 wrote...

David Gaider said that in his opinion, the graphics already look better than they do in those screenshots. The desert threw me off too, but it might not be that bad when we see it with more current graphics.

David Gaider?

[Naughty Bear]

I'm more fascinated by the blood, are they decals or they actually have their own little physics? like toribash? If so, i will be amused for hours.

[andar91]

bcooper56 wrote...

andar91 wrote...

David Gaider said that in his opinion, the graphics already look better than they do in those screenshots. The desert threw me off too, but it might not be that bad when we see it with more current graphics.

David Gaider?

The lead writer for the game. Here's the thread with his comments.  http://social.biowar...ex/3108691&lf=8

[errant_knight]

bcooper56 wrote...

andar91 wrote...

David Gaider said that in his opinion, the graphics already look better than they do in those screenshots. The desert threw me off too, but it might not be that bad when we see it with more current graphics.

David Gaider?

The lead writer for DA:Origins and, one presumes, DA2.

I did think they were astonishingly ugly given how much PR they were putting out about them. Actually, I don't need to qualify that. I just plain thought they were astonishingly ugly. I can see them improving somewhat, like that plastic looking blood and ground, but I don't see the design style changing all that much--it seems to be what they want--although it might. One can only hope. I thought the people were every bit as bad as the environment and darkspawn. For one thing, it's very disconcerting to go from semi-realistic to comic book like.

Modifié par errant_knight, 17 juillet 2010 - 10:17 .

[Noobius_Maximo]

Judge the graphics when it comes out, and not when it is still in its early stages.

Edit: I fail at grammars.

Modifié par Noobius_Maximo, 18 juillet 2010 - 12:09 .

[andar91]

Sorry the link is messed up. Here's the thread; unfortunately I can't display just his comments, but they're in there. http://social.biowar...1/index/3108691

[Mad Method]

They need to post better screenshots asap.

This is hilarious. Bioware decided to show off how good their new game looks by posting screenshots that actually look worse. Retrograde motion ftw?

Modifié par Mad Method, 17 juillet 2010 - 10:26 .

[errant_knight]

Noobius_Maximo wrote...

Judge the graphics when the comes out, and not when it is still in its early stages.

They put them out to advertise the changes. Why shouldn't we judge them now? They said 'Wow! Better graphics!' and gave us those. They didn't say, 'Here's an early draft.' They may be, but you can't go on about how awesome they are and then not expect a reaction if they aren't.

[andar91]

Mad Method wrote...

They need to post better screenshots asap.

This is hilarious. Bioware decided to show off how good their new game looks by posting screenshots that actually look worse. Retrograde motion ftw?

I'm sure we'll see better ones soon; the game was only announced two weeks ago. I have a feeling that article was written a ways before it was actually released, which would make sense considering they have to format the magazine, figure out what else is going into it, and everything else that any print publication goes through (or so I would assume they go through).

[bcooper56]

andar91 wrote...

Sorry the link is messed up. Here's the thread; unfortunately I can't display just his comments, but they're in there. http://social.biowar...1/index/3108691

What page i really don't want look through it all.

[Dummkopf]

http://social.biowar...ex/3108691&lf=8

[andar91]

Dummkopf wrote...

http://social.biowar...ex/3108691&lf=8

lol, I couldn't get it to do that for some reason.

[Games4ever]

In my opinion they should postpone this game for several years until they are ready to meet today's graphics standards,what we have seen here is far below



unless something drastic happens with the graphics, it will only be the most loyal fans who will buy this, and with a bit luck it will sell around 500,000 max

[Naughty Bear]

Origin's did not have the best graphics and it sold more than Mass Effect 2.

[Games4ever]

Naughty Bear wrote...

Origin's did not have the best graphics and it sold more than Mass Effect 2.

In some areas even Dragon Age one looks better then what we have seen 

[Onyx Jaguar]

They should re-license the infinity engine



If for some reason they don't have the rights to it anymore

[Rubbish Hero]

Game look super cold.

[Johnny Shepard]

I dont think the graphics worse. Its just a different type of graphic.

[IronVanguard]

Doubt it's the end product.



Also, get over it. Oh, graphics. Whatever.

[Noobius_Maximo]

Johnny Shepard wrote...

I dont think the graphics worse. Its just a different type of graphic.

Really? Environment textures look really low-res.

[Games4ever]

It's a Mad World

[CakesOnAPlane]

I think the faces look better, it's just the bland area that makes it seem bad I think. Stick them in a forest and see what it looks like.