MadCat221 wrote...
You only gotta pay for the turrets and bars once.
Maintenance (when it comes to the turrets).
Do you let the guard keep beating the prisoner?
Débuté par
Nightwriter
, juil. 19 2010 01:03
#126
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:07
Guest_Shandepared_*
Guest_Shandepared_*
-
- Guests
Maintenance (when it comes to the turrets).
Retour en haut
#127
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:09
AntiChri5
-
- Members
- 7 965 messages
Shandepared wrote...
AntiChri5 wrote...
But then he cant feed himself.
Yes he can. His fingers and arms are mangled but he can lick the slop off his fingers if he needs to.
And if he starves to death?
Who is the Warden going to have beaten this time? The officer who ordered his crippling, perhaps?
#128
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:10
AntiChri5
-
- Members
- 7 965 messages
thegreateski wrote...
If a turrent is hacked then that means you have no control over it.AntiChri5 wrote...
Turn it off.
I suppose you could have the OTHER turrents shoot it up but then that brings up the problem of multiple hackings.
and the need to replace those machines.
Bleh. My head hurts.
Cut the power to that turret.
#129
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:11
Costin_Razvan
-
- Members
- 7 010 messages
I almost never stop them, unless do want to see the renegade intimidate option.
You hear that guy who says he is in for small things like killing TWENTY people and he seems like a kind guy? Do you realize what kind of person we are talking about to be in there and kill someone? If you can't imagine then read the email you get after getting Jack from one of the prisoners....scary ****.
I don't judge people, as I feel only God can do that but man I would be hard pressed not to demand execution for a person like that.
You hear that guy who says he is in for small things like killing TWENTY people and he seems like a kind guy? Do you realize what kind of person we are talking about to be in there and kill someone? If you can't imagine then read the email you get after getting Jack from one of the prisoners....scary ****.
I don't judge people, as I feel only God can do that but man I would be hard pressed not to demand execution for a person like that.
Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 19 juillet 2010 - 05:12 .
#130
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:12
thegreateski
-
- Members
- 4 976 messages
Then you would have to fix the cables.
Meh. Guards are cheaper. Preferably a combination of guards and turrets.
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
Meh. Guards are cheaper. Preferably a combination of guards and turrets.
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
#131
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:13
AntiChri5
-
- Members
- 7 965 messages
thegreateski wrote...
Then you would have to fix the cables.
Meh. Guards are cheaper. Preferably a combination of guards and turrets.
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
Unplugging it wont break the cables.
Guards need to be fed.
Streamlining.
#132
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:14
Sursion
-
- Members
- 950 messages
thegreateski wrote...
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
There are. You first see them on Freedoms Progress.
#133
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:14
Guest_Shandepared_*
Guest_Shandepared_*
-
- Guests
AntiChri5 wrote...
And if he starves to death?
You mean if he goes on a hunger strike? If he does that we'll force him to eat.
#134
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:15
thegreateski
-
- Members
- 4 976 messages
I was under the impression that those were robotic drones.Sursion wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
There are. You first see them on Freedoms Progress.
#135
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:16
Sursion
-
- Members
- 950 messages
thegreateski wrote...
I was under the impression that those were robotic drones.Sursion wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
There are. You first see them on Freedoms Progress.
Well, if they're robotic, they're most likely automated.
#136
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:17
thegreateski
-
- Members
- 4 976 messages
1. Then couldn't someone just unplug every turret in the place?AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
Then you would have to fix the cables.
Meh. Guards are cheaper. Preferably a combination of guards and turrets.
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
Unplugging it wont break the cables.
Guards need to be fed.
2. Electricity aint cheap either.
#137
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:18
thegreateski
-
- Members
- 4 976 messages
Yes. But they're not turrets.Sursion wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
I was under the impression that those were robotic drones.Sursion wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
There are. You first see them on Freedoms Progress.
Well, if they're robotic, they're most likely automated.
Eh. My view of a turret is an armored, automated, machine gun that is attached to a wall, ceiling, or popping out of the floor.
Modifié par thegreateski, 19 juillet 2010 - 05:19 .
#138
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:24
AntiChri5
-
- Members
- 7 965 messages
thegreateski wrote...
1. Then couldn't someone just unplug every turret in the place?AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
Then you would have to fix the cables.
Meh. Guards are cheaper. Preferably a combination of guards and turrets.
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
Unplugging it wont break the cables.
Guards need to be fed.
2. Electricity aint cheap either.
Only if they were in your central security hub, from where these things are controlled, at which point they can turn off life support so your screwed anyway.
Hmmmm....or maybe we can install a system where you need two officers to put in passwords before you can cut the power to a turret?
2 Cheaper than clothing, feeding, arming, armouring, training and keeping guards.
#139
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:25
PPF65
-
- Members
- 288 messages
This thread is great, Interesting moral debate (imo).
Personally, I usually stop the beating, because I don't think is right to torture a person like that, and because I dislike Kuril from the onset, and don't care for his finances very much.
If the guy is as bad as we are informed, then the Shepards who think he deserves the beating should have the option to throw down the proverbial gauntlet and challange the prisoner to a fight, and just kill him and get it over with.
Personally, I usually stop the beating, because I don't think is right to torture a person like that, and because I dislike Kuril from the onset, and don't care for his finances very much.
If the guy is as bad as we are informed, then the Shepards who think he deserves the beating should have the option to throw down the proverbial gauntlet and challange the prisoner to a fight, and just kill him and get it over with.
#140
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:36
thegreateski
-
- Members
- 4 976 messages
Of course you'd have to keep a few guards and other staff to watch the cameras, fix things, and look after the prisoners health.AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
1. Then couldn't someone just unplug every turret in the place?AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
Then you would have to fix the cables.
Meh. Guards are cheaper. Preferably a combination of guards and turrets.
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
Unplugging it wont break the cables.
Guards need to be fed.
2. Electricity aint cheap either.
Only if they were in your central security hub, from where these things are controlled, at which point they can turn off life support so your screwed anyway.
Hmmmm....or maybe we can install a system where you need two officers to put in passwords before you can cut the power to a turret?
2 Cheaper than clothing, feeding, arming, armouring, training and keeping guards.
You'd be really fuxored if someone managed to detonate an EMP bomb near the station though . . .
#141
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:40
AntiChri5
-
- Members
- 7 965 messages
thegreateski wrote...
Of course you'd have to keep a few guards and other staff to watch the cameras, fix things, and look after the prisoners health.AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
1. Then couldn't someone just unplug every turret in the place?AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
Then you would have to fix the cables.
Meh. Guards are cheaper. Preferably a combination of guards and turrets.
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
Unplugging it wont break the cables.
Guards need to be fed.
2. Electricity aint cheap either.
Only if they were in your central security hub, from where these things are controlled, at which point they can turn off life support so your screwed anyway.
Hmmmm....or maybe we can install a system where you need two officers to put in passwords before you can cut the power to a turret?
2 Cheaper than clothing, feeding, arming, armouring, training and keeping guards.
You'd be really fuxored if someone managed to detonate an EMP bomb near the station though . . .
The EMP would also knock out the life support, killing all prisoners.
Not much of a rescue.
#142
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:45
thegreateski
-
- Members
- 4 976 messages
Well it's not like the the life support going off is going to kill everyone immediately. Plenty of time to get what you came for.AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
Of course you'd have to keep a few guards and other staff to watch the cameras, fix things, and look after the prisoners health.AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
1. Then couldn't someone just unplug every turret in the place?AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
Then you would have to fix the cables.
Meh. Guards are cheaper. Preferably a combination of guards and turrets.
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
Unplugging it wont break the cables.
Guards need to be fed.
2. Electricity aint cheap either.
Only if they were in your central security hub, from where these things are controlled, at which point they can turn off life support so your screwed anyway.
Hmmmm....or maybe we can install a system where you need two officers to put in passwords before you can cut the power to a turret?
2 Cheaper than clothing, feeding, arming, armouring, training and keeping guards.
You'd be really fuxored if someone managed to detonate an EMP bomb near the station though . . .
The EMP would also knock out the life support, killing all prisoners.
Not much of a rescue.
Of course this is pointless because the craft would likely be shot down before it even got close.
Modifié par thegreateski, 19 juillet 2010 - 05:46 .
#143
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:50
AntiChri5
-
- Members
- 7 965 messages
thegreateski wrote...
Well it's not like the the life support going off is going to kill everyone immediately. Plenty of time to get what you came for.AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
Of course you'd have to keep a few guards and other staff to watch the cameras, fix things, and look after the prisoners health.AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
1. Then couldn't someone just unplug every turret in the place?AntiChri5 wrote...
thegreateski wrote...
Then you would have to fix the cables.
Meh. Guards are cheaper. Preferably a combination of guards and turrets.
Why are there no automated turrets in this game?
Unplugging it wont break the cables.
Guards need to be fed.
2. Electricity aint cheap either.
Only if they were in your central security hub, from where these things are controlled, at which point they can turn off life support so your screwed anyway.
Hmmmm....or maybe we can install a system where you need two officers to put in passwords before you can cut the power to a turret?
2 Cheaper than clothing, feeding, arming, armouring, training and keeping guards.
You'd be really fuxored if someone managed to detonate an EMP bomb near the station though . . .
The EMP would also knock out the life support, killing all prisoners.
Not much of a rescue.
Of course this is pointless because the craft would likely be shot down before it even got close.
Did i neglect to mention how my floating dungeon of doom was desinged?
Theonly oxygen in the room is that being pumped into it. A few seconds without it and you run out of air.
Aaaaand im off to bed.
Will answer any more questions tomorrow.
Modifié par AntiChri5, 19 juillet 2010 - 05:51 .
#144
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:57
asaiasai
-
- Members
- 1 391 messages
I do not as it is none of my bussiness. I have no information as to why the prisoner is there, nor do i have any information as to why the guard feels it is necessary to single him out for some extra lovin.
Some people need to have thier walking around priviledges revoked then there are some who need thier breathing priviledges revoked.
Asai
Some people need to have thier walking around priviledges revoked then there are some who need thier breathing priviledges revoked.
Asai
#145
Guest_raptor1906_*
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 05:58
Guest_raptor1906_*
Guest_raptor1906_*
-
- Guests
Why would you even give a **** about criminals? They deserve to be punished befitting their crime and it is only fair that they suffer. Infact they should be used as human test subjects for Cerberus instead of innocent children like Gillian. So no I never convince the warden to stop beating him.
And from what I remember even if you choose the paragon option, that trash still sends you a threatening email after the mission.
And from what I remember even if you choose the paragon option, that trash still sends you a threatening email after the mission.
#146
Guest_wiggles_*
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 06:04
Guest_wiggles_*
Guest_wiggles_*
-
- Guests
Haha, this thread is awesome. The idea of beating someone's mental problems out of them is kinda like trying to grapple with a prime Fedor Emelianenko; you can try but it isn't going to get you anywhere.
#147
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 06:18
TheShogunOfHarlem
-
- Members
- 675 messages
Even my renegades tell the guards to stop. Being bad is one thing, but sadism is intolerable. (unless they really deserve it)
#148
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 06:18
thegreateski
-
- Members
- 4 976 messages
Nah. That E-mail was from the guy in the cell next to his. The one you talk to.raptor1906 wrote...
And from what I remember even if you choose the paragon option, that trash still sends you a threatening email after the mission.
#149
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 06:51
Docbrown777
-
- Members
- 86 messages
Who am I to tell the guard how to do his job? He doesn't come onboard the Normandy and look over my shoulder and tell me what to do.
#150
Guest_wiggles_*
Posté 19 juillet 2010 - 07:08
Guest_wiggles_*
Guest_wiggles_*
-
- Guests
Docbrown777 wrote...
Who am I to tell the guard how to do his job? He doesn't come onboard the Normandy and look over my shoulder and tell me what to do.
You tell 'em. Personally, I find it intrusive to tell a teacher to stop beating or molesting children who misbehave. I mean, I wouldn't like it if they came to my job & told me to fix up the cover sheets for my TPS reports.
