42753 réponses à ce sujet

[Goodwood]

Another tweaked wallpaper:

[Captain Crash]

Arghh DA2 is making me lose track of this thread 

Great looking wallpaper Goodwood 

Really good eye too akodo!  Noticing that was the Normandy was really impressive :happy:

[Goodwood]

Thanks, but Goodwood likes the one from the last page better.

[Shadow_Soul]

Hm...Arrival out on March 29th, yay! I have been dying to see Hackett. Maybe it has Ashley/Kaidan in it as well.

On another note, I have to thank  M3cHr3p71| for getting me pics of Lili and Lia.

Edit: Gah! The pics won't show up. (Help, please.)

Modifié par Shadow_Soul, 18 mars 2011 - 11:47 .

[thompsmt]

Really like that we've finally got a date for Arrival, and hopefully the marketing blitz for ME3 will get up and running during the summer, so we can have more screenshots to agonize over for plot scraps.

[NM7]

A bit late, but yay new DLC!

Nice to see Bishop Hackett will be making an appearance and Hrist will finally be rid of that useless, Mickey Mouse outfit called Cerberus that she was railroaded in to working with. Double win!

[TheMarshal]

AkodoRyu wrote...

Probably somebody already noticed this, but considering there isn't any more copies of this room in the game, Hackett will be a guest on the Normandy

Angle is a bit off, but hell. I wonder if Marge will burst on him a little bit of this "alliance dissapointment", that seems to eat her a bit.

The lighting is completely different.  Hackett is lit - and well lit - from his left (our right) and Shepard is much darker and only lit from above and to her right (our left).  Along with the blurring of the background, despite the similar range of focus, my guess is that they just dropped the bust of Hackett against a different backdrop so they didn't use anything which would give a plot point away.

[Captain Crash]

Those words will come back and haunt you Marshall im sure.   Bioware isnt going to all that effort to cover up Hacketts location.  Why would they want to too begin with?  Too much effort and I doubt they would have thought it would have been noticed regardless.


Remember this picture of the arc projector?  That was released on 9th March and the inadvertantly showed the Kestral Armour.  That wasnt released until 6th July.  During that whole period Bioware was quiet about the armour, even though we knew it existed.  My point being Bioware can make mistakes.  This isnt a mistake but something an observant fan figured out.  Well done again Akodo  


Anyway if anyone wants to discuss this issue further move it to the Arrival thread now.  Its gone a little offtopic


Back to femshep!   I have thing for femshep and Garrus at the moment 

[MizzNaaa]

Hackett!!!


Gosh I'm so excited for this DLC!

Hi ladies...haven't been on here in a while, what's up?

[MizzNaaa]

And here's some Jennifer Shepard for the heck of it...

[Cyansomnia]

Captain Crash wrote...

I have thing for femshep and Garrus at the moment 

/funny comic snip

As do I.  Moira would probably just walk into that store brazen as you please.  She honestly doesn't care who knows what she does in the bedroom... and that she does it with a turian.

TheMarshal wrote...

The lighting is completely different.  Hackett is lit - and well lit - from his left (our right) and Shepard is much darker and only lit from above and to her right (our left).  Along with the blurring of the background, despite the similar range of focus, my guess is that they just dropped the bust of Hackett against a different backdrop so they didn't use anything which would give a plot point away.

The lighting doesn't really matter.  There are times during conversations where the lighting will completely change.  For example, when you talk to Garrus the lighting always gets brighter and more flattering.  If you zoom out and watch with flycam you can see it swapping back and forth.  They do a lot of crazy things with convos and cutscenes you don't notice. Mostly with lighting, depth of field, teleporting and sometimes just moving models of characters around into weird places so you can't see them anymore.

Modifié par Aislinn Trista, 19 mars 2011 - 02:55 .

[Influ]

TheMarshal wrote...

The lighting is completely different.  Hackett is lit - and well lit - from his left (our right) and Shepard is much darker and only lit from above and to her right (our left).  Along with the blurring of the background, despite the similar range of focus, my guess is that they just dropped the bust of Hackett against a different backdrop so they didn't use anything which would give a plot point away.

The reason the background is blurred is likely due to the shot with Hackett is taken from a cutscene. That's why there is a Depth of Field effect present. That would also explain the difference in lighting, because it is handled differently in cutscenes.

[ADLegend21]

aww I wish I had a thing for garrus Femshep, ut I've lost my interest for it, mainly cuz of Garrus. in actuality Kallen's Jacob romance was actually her Garrus romance PT, but she broke up with him after the SM for Jacob (who led the fire teams). I know, I'm a weirdo.

[drwells123]

Aislinn Trista wrote...

As do I.  Moira would probably just walk into that store brazen as you please.  She honestly doesn't care who knows what she does in the bedroom... and that she does it with a turian.

Yeah. If mine wanted to go shopping in there and one of her squadmates was hanging back, she'd snap, "What is this, high school?"

[Ty2011]

 How do you guys take such awesome screenshots of your Femsheps? I'm guessing you're all PC users? I'd love to share my amazing Femshep but I'm on Xbox. 

[Arokel]

The FemShep does not exist! Face the truth, FemShep is only there to satisfy the Hale fans!

jk jk

[JeanLuc761]

Lia Shepard says hi once more.

[GuardianAngel470]

Ty2011 wrote...

 How do you guys take such awesome screenshots of your Femsheps? I'm guessing you're all PC users? I'd love to share my amazing Femshep but I'm on Xbox. 

Get a capture card for your PC and set your PC up by your Xbox. It works, but is harder.

[Yakko77]

Goodwood wrote...

Goodwood thinks this could get quite interesting.

I  can't put my finger on it but something about that armor makes Kaiden look.... chubby.  LOL!

As for femshep, she looks ready for action.  Glad she's on our side.

Great pic.

[Kaltrec]

Arokel wrote...

The FemShep does not exist! Face the truth, FemShep is only there to satisfy the Hale fans!

jk jk

You better be

[GuardianAngel470]

Yakko77 wrote...

Goodwood wrote...

Goodwood thinks this could get quite interesting.

I  can't put my finger on it but something about that armor makes Kaiden look.... chubby.  LOL!

As for femshep, she looks ready for action.  Glad she's on our side.

Great pic.

I think he's actually getting distorted by the Field of View.

[GuardianAngel470]

TheMarshal wrote...

AkodoRyu wrote...

Probably somebody already noticed this, but considering there isn't any more copies of this room in the game, Hackett will be a guest on the Normandy

Angle is a bit off, but hell. I wonder if Marge will burst on him a little bit of this "alliance dissapointment", that seems to eat her a bit.

The lighting is completely different.  Hackett is lit - and well lit - from his left (our right) and Shepard is much darker and only lit from above and to her right (our left).  Along with the blurring of the background, despite the similar range of focus, my guess is that they just dropped the bust of Hackett against a different backdrop so they didn't use anything which would give a plot point away.

It should be noted that ME2 has a variable number of cinematic lights. You can have 1, 2, or 3 cinematic lights used to light your character's face. It's in the video settings options.

[Influ]

GuardianAngel470 wrote...

TheMarshal wrote...

AkodoRyu wrote...

Probably somebody already noticed this, but considering there isn't any more copies of this room in the game, Hackett will be a guest on the Normandy

Angle is a bit off, but hell. I wonder if Marge will burst on him a little bit of this "alliance dissapointment", that seems to eat her a bit.
*picsnip*

The lighting is completely different.  Hackett is lit - and well lit - from his left (our right) and Shepard is much darker and only lit from above and to her right (our left).  Along with the blurring of the background, despite the similar range of focus, my guess is that they just dropped the bust of Hackett against a different backdrop so they didn't use anything which would give a plot point away.

It should be noted that ME2 has a variable number of cinematic lights. You can have 1, 2, or 3 cinematic lights used to light your character's face. It's in the video settings options.

Those only affect lighting during cutscenes, conversations and such. As I pointed out earlier, the Hackett shot is likely from a cutscene while the one with Shepard is not.

[AkodoRyu]

Practically what Influ says. During most of the convos in the game light changes, and the FOV is at 45 I guess. I took my pic of Shepard with the flycam, so the FOV is "default" and the face is not lit. Hackett's face is even more lit that during convos Shepard - Chakwas, but the characteristic for this place blue-greenish shadows are the same.

The room is the sickbay by the way, where the door is an exit.

Modifié par AkodoRyu, 19 mars 2011 - 08:47 .