adneate wrote...
JamieCOTC wrote...
I like the quote, btw.
If I recall correctly it's Japanese in Origin, part of the Bushido tradition of the Samurai in which self-sacrifice is a large part of a warrior's lifestyle.
You do recall correctly.
adneate wrote...
JamieCOTC wrote...
I like the quote, btw.
If I recall correctly it's Japanese in Origin, part of the Bushido tradition of the Samurai in which self-sacrifice is a large part of a warrior's lifestyle.
Modifié par Killjoy Cutter, 07 octobre 2010 - 02:51 .
Sable Phoenix wrote...
Re: numbers beating the reapers, let's consider the Battle of the Citadel. That was one Reaper. Yes, the geth fleet helped, but even so, that battle cost, if I remember correctly, twenty turian and eight human cruisers, unknown numbers of frigates and fighters, plus, depending on Shepard's actions, the Destiny Ascension, the largest and most powerful ship in known space. Almost all the Alliance vessels were personally destroyed by Sovereign when it lit up those molten-metal particle beams. This gives us approximately a twenty-eight to one ratio necessary to take on the Reapers and win, and that's with top of the line warships, not refitted cargo vessels like the quarians employ. Sovereign claimed that the Reaper fleet would "darken the skies of every world".
Somehow, I doubt superior numbers are going to make a significant difference. That's why I don't get it when people say they want to see space combat in the third installment. It's not possible to beat the Reapers in a stand-up fight. It will take investigation, ingenuity and a lot of luck.
The dark energy tie-in is obvious in ME2. I think that Shepard's machine-ness will be a less obvious but even more critical one.
f1r3storm wrote...
But they were also pretty much surprised at the citadel and now they have an idea of what weapons the reapers use and they might work to build proper defenses against them.
Delerius_Jedi wrote...
@JamieCOTC: Up to and including
that video you posted I found the Jacob romance almost passable. It's
what happens after this scene that ends up making the whole thing
terrible. But in general I just think that BioWare needs to separate the
character development from the romance plots and they need to do it
fast. Dragon Age: Origins completely pummels ME1 and ME2 in this area,
so it can be done.
lastpatriot wrote...
@ JamieCOTC,
I just finished reading over your “long” post and I really appreciate your comments and the level of detail you went into explaining your point of view. The great aspect of this thread is that we all have the same basic hope which is that we can continue to build upon the “soul” (as you call it) of our own Shepard based upon her background and personality.
In my run for LotSB, my Shepard wasn’t a huge fan of Liara but she respected her knowledge and considered her a friend (my Shep is very loyal to her crew). In ME:1, my Shepard had issues with Liara in that she considered her too emotional and unwilling to pull the trigger when necessary. This is mainly because my Shep was a colonist with the more ruthless personality due to the horrific conditions she was forced to deal with combined with an almost uncontrollable rage towards Batarians (Bringing Down the Sky) and slavers in general. However, as events of ME:2 unfolded, she grew to respect Liara’s new found strength and Shepard had to admit that she may have misjudged her former crew-mate. By the end of the DLC, their friendship became something that my Shep considered to be priceless because of not just the experiences they went through, but the ability to break down those emotional walls they both had. In the end, Shepard found that she and Liara were much more similar than she would have believed.
My point is similar to yours in that with any good RPG, I want my Shepard to be, well, mine! We all will play the character how we feel but in the end, my experience and yours should be different and that should reflect in the character as well.
Sable Phoenix wrote...
Somehow, I doubt superior numbers are going to make a significant difference. That's why I don't get it when people say they want to see space combat in the third installment. It's not possible to beat the Reapers in a stand-up fight. It will take investigation, ingenuity and a lot of luck.
The dark energy tie-in is obvious in ME2. I think that Shepard's machine-ness will be a less obvious but even more critical one.
Mox Ruuga wrote...
f1r3storm wrote...
But they were also pretty much surprised at the citadel and now they have an idea of what weapons the reapers use and they might work to build proper defenses against them.
"Ah yes, the Reapers..."
These finger quoting schmucks are the ones busy developing new defenses against a threat they have discounted?
Sable Phoenix wrote...
Re: numbers beating the reapers, let's consider the Battle of the Citadel. That was one Reaper. Yes, the geth fleet helped, but even so, that battle cost, if I remember correctly, twenty turian and eight human cruisers, unknown numbers of frigates and fighters, plus, depending on Shepard's actions, the Destiny Ascension, the largest and most powerful ship in known space. Almost all the Alliance vessels were personally destroyed by Sovereign when it lit up those molten-metal particle beams. This gives us approximately a twenty-eight to one ratio necessary to take on the Reapers and win, and that's with top of the line warships, not refitted cargo vessels like the quarians employ. Sovereign claimed that the Reaper fleet would "darken the skies of every world".
Modifié par Sable Phoenix, 07 octobre 2010 - 03:41 .
JamieCOTC wrote...
It’s interesting to note that both our girls are colonists however yours is (mostly?) renegade and mine is mostly paragon. How much of that is head-canon imagination and how much is the actual game, I don’t know, but you are right. Our Shepards should be our own.
Mox Ruuga wrote...
"Ah yes, the Reapers..."
These finger quoting schmucks are the ones busy developing new defenses against a threat they have discounted?

Modifié par Chignon, 07 octobre 2010 - 04:22 .
Guest_avalon30_*
Guest_LesEnfantsTerribles_*
Modifié par Chignon, 07 octobre 2010 - 04:04 .
Sable Phoenix wrote...
I'm just saying, if all Shep has to do is get a lot of races to band together with a lot of ships to win, I'm going to feel like she's kinda cheated out of the real ending where she makes the big difference. I mean, that's all pretty much set up in the first game by your actions with the krogan and rachni, plus add the quarians and geth in the second.
f1r3storm wrote...
That basically sums up my thoughts everytime when i see the ending of ME2.
Sable Phoenix wrote...
Also remember, Sovereign's shields remained impervious to weapons fire until Shepard killed the Saren cyberzombie. That was the one and only reason the Alliance and remaining Citadel fleets could actually damage it. I doubt the Reapers will be stupid enough to all make easily killable cyberzombies to drop their shields with.
Modifié par JamieCOTC, 07 octobre 2010 - 04:26 .
JamieCOTC wrote...
I can see it now, Cyberzombie Kaiden will be leading the Reaper attack!! This has to be in ME3!
Okay, Cyberzombie Kaiden may be a bit much, but still, CyberZombies!!! This has to be in ME3!
Chignon wrote...
JamieCOTC wrote...
I can see it now, Cyberzombie Kaiden will be leading the Reaper attack!! This has to be in ME3!
Okay, Cyberzombie Kaiden may be a bit much, but still, CyberZombies!!! This has to be in ME3!
No. Just no. I don't want to see an indoctrinated VS Cyberzombie. Ever. Virmire was hard enough without being forced into killing one of them yet again.
JamieCOTC wrote...
Okay, I was just kidding about the Kaiden Cyberzombie. Besides, he probably wouldn't fit into a dust pan and not even the Reapers are that all powerful.
Unless of course ... they got him out just in the nick of time ...

JamieCOTC wrote...
Video games are narcissistic enough w/out the main characters becoming godlike saviors.
JamieCOTC wrote...
Okay, I was just kidding about the Kaiden Cyberzombie. Besides, he probably wouldn't fit into a dust pan and not even the Reapers are that all powerful.