. Again, probably wouldnt work so well but it'd be interesting to see none the less
Modifié par Aradace, 21 juillet 2010 - 09:35 .
Poll: What type of combat do you want for the Console changed version
Débuté par
Haexpane
, juil. 21 2010 12:15
#26
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 09:34
Aradace
-
- Members
- 4 359 messages
You know...although it wouldnt work probably, my closets "vote" would be 6....Except instead of full blown turn based combat, make it more like FFXIII's ATB/Paradigm system . Again, probably wouldnt work so well but it'd be interesting to see none the less
. Again, probably wouldnt work so well but it'd be interesting to see none the less
Retour en haut
#27
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 09:38
MonkeyKaboom
-
- Members
- 238 messages
All attacks and abilities should be button triggered, including melee and arrow shots.
And LOL at anyone thinking DA combat was, "strategic." All you had to do was set your companions' AI's and you could sit back and just move your character point to point while stuffing your face with the other hand with beer and cheesy poofs. This game had no strategy.
And LOL at anyone thinking DA combat was, "strategic." All you had to do was set your companions' AI's and you could sit back and just move your character point to point while stuffing your face with the other hand with beer and cheesy poofs. This game had no strategy.
Modifié par MonkeyKaboom, 21 juillet 2010 - 09:50 .
#28
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 11:08
Hulk Hsieh
-
- Members
- 511 messages
How about "BG: Dark Alliance" or "Marvel: Ultimate Alliance"?
Modifié par Hulk Hsieh, 21 juillet 2010 - 11:08 .
#29
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 11:14
V-time
-
- Members
- 18 messages
Well my vote would go for Demon Souls style of combat but that doesn´t really lend itself towards party based games.
#31
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 11:17
thejshman
-
- Members
- 43 messages
An improved version of the last games combat system would be fine with me.
#33
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 05:04
Johnny Shepard
-
- Members
- 1 492 messages
Where is the link to the poll?
#34
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 05:37
Blackbaron15
-
- Members
- 224 messages
Lets keep it dragon age style please. I have not a clue why you should take cover in dragonage the only thing that would be good against is arrows.
#35
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 05:41
Grommash94
-
- Members
- 927 messages
MonkeyKaboom wrote...
All attacks and abilities should be button triggered, including melee and arrow shots.
And LOL at anyone thinking DA combat was, "strategic." All you had to do was set your companions' AI's and you could sit back and just move your character point to point while stuffing your face with the other hand with beer and cheesy poofs. This game had no strategy.
I disagree. On Nightmare some of the fights were particularly tough on the consoles, because you couldn't position your companions properly/and targetting was horrible.
#36
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 06:15
Valente11
-
- Members
- 125 messages
err so I guess the whole "Baldur's Gate spiritual successor" idea is being left behind with DAO huh? I'd prefer BG's strategic combat, but it seems that dream is getting more and more unlikely.
#37
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 08:14
Haexpane
-
- Members
- 2 711 messages
Thomas9321 wrote...
^ The Bioware team did come up with KOTOR combat.
A hybrid of KOTOR and Dragon Age combat would be lovely, and really suit the consoles strengths.
One thing the console version needed was more ability to swap between sets of abilities. For example you could set three abilities, then press a button to swap to another set. I appreciate that I'm not presenting my point well here, what I'm getting at is a more intuitive version of the spell swapping from the original Fable.
.
I agree, Everquest Online for the PS2 had a very easy to use branching system. And it worked w/ 1 button.
You press R2 or L2 (can't remember) and then 4 options popped up. 1 of the options was Drill down to another 4. You could customize this completely.
Need a spell? Press circle OR hold L2 and Dpad select deeper and deeper. It worked extremely well.
In fact it worked so well, many people used it for chatting as it was faster and more efficient than keyboard. You could hotkey your targets and phrases for raids and such.
#38
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 08:15
Haexpane
-
- Members
- 2 711 messages
MonkeyKaboom wrote...
And LOL at anyone thinking DA combat was, "strategic." All you had to do was set your companions' AI's and you could sit back and just move your character point to point while stuffing your face with the other hand with beer and cheesy poofs. This game had no strategy.
No, you are talking about the game on medium/hard for no boss fights. I hit a random encounter at level 18 while the screen was loading I went upstairs for something. Came back down a few minutes later and saw a bunch of dead darkspawn and ogres.
I was not even watching and my party wiped out a bunch of darkspawn on auto AI
Blame the scaling issues
#39
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 08:15
Haexpane
-
- Members
- 2 711 messages
Johnny Shepard wrote...
Where is the link to the poll?
IDK, I didn't see a poll option when I posted
#40
Posté 21 juillet 2010 - 08:16
Haexpane
-
- Members
- 2 711 messages
Grommash94 wrote...
I disagree. On Nightmare some of the fights were particularly tough on the consoles, because you couldn't position your companions properly/and targetting was horrible.
Yes, Gakang the Unbound can be tough on consoles because controlling the party is problematic. Once I positioned everyone, I set them all to "ON HOLD" you cant set individuals on the console version
