Shinian2 wrote...
The Edge wrote...
So... to what extent could Flemeth be involved with Hawke (like a party member, or just some reoccuring figure)?
I think she'll be an advisory figure like at the start of DAO
The Edge wrote...
So... to what extent could Flemeth be involved with Hawke (like a party member, or just some reoccuring figure)?
link?filetemo wrote...
source of the screenshot please?
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
I just came.
That's over 200hrs of gameplay. 
Modifié par PARAGON87, 21 juillet 2010 - 04:37 .
PARAGON87 wrote...
I really don't understand how DA2 can be 3x longer than DA:O. That's over 200hrs of gameplay.
I liked DA:O, I really did. But still the pull you by the shirt mechanic, of:
Go to Redcliffe, but after you have to go to the Circle Tower, but then you have to go into the Fade, then back to Redcliffe, then to Haven, then the Gauntlet, then back to Redcliffe, then back to the Fade, ad nauseum.
If DA2 has this type of story mechanic at work I might as well kiss my life goodbye and devote it to DA2.
javierabegazo wrote...
Despite what DAO advertised, it was never a 80 game. I played on Nightmare my first time, did every sidequest, talked to every single NPC, read everything in the codex and I clocked at about 48 hours. But all the same, I expect DA2 to not be more than 70 at the very very most.
PARAGON87 wrote...
javierabegazo wrote...
Despite what DAO advertised, it was never a 80 game. I played on Nightmare my first time, did every sidequest, talked to every single NPC, read everything in the codex and I clocked at about 48 hours. But all the same, I expect DA2 to not be more than 70 at the very very most.
True, I think my longest playthrough was 56 hours, and I took my tme, obviously. But still, I'm at maybe my 4th playthough and my 4th different origin character, and I honestly don't know how I can beat the game another two more times before I start to grow grey hair!
Guest_Capt. Obvious_*
NKKKK wrote...
Once again, the major question, is she sexable?
NKKKK wrote...
Once again, the major question, is she sexable?
I did all the stuff you said, and my first playthrough took about 77 hours. My second playthrough took around 60.javierabegazo wrote...
PARAGON87 wrote...
I really don't understand how DA2 can be 3x longer than DA:O. That's over 200hrs of gameplay.
I liked DA:O, I really did. But still the pull you by the shirt mechanic, of:
Go to Redcliffe, but after you have to go to the Circle Tower, but then you have to go into the Fade, then back to Redcliffe, then to Haven, then the Gauntlet, then back to Redcliffe, then back to the Fade, ad nauseum.
If DA2 has this type of story mechanic at work I might as well kiss my life goodbye and devote it to DA2.
Despite what DAO advertised, it was never a 80 game. I played on Nightmare my first time, did every sidequest, talked to every single NPC, read everything in the codex and I clocked at about 48 hours. But all the same, I expect DA2 to not be more than 70 at the very very most.
link?javierabegazo wrote...
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
I just came.
lol, these forums would not be complete without you dear
Gill Kaiser wrote...
I did all the stuff you said, and my first playthrough took about 77 hours. My second playthrough took around 60.javierabegazo wrote...
PARAGON87 wrote...
I really don't understand how DA2 can be 3x longer than DA:O. That's over 200hrs of gameplay.
I liked DA:O, I really did. But still the pull you by the shirt mechanic, of:
Go to Redcliffe, but after you have to go to the Circle Tower, but then you have to go into the Fade, then back to Redcliffe, then to Haven, then the Gauntlet, then back to Redcliffe, then back to the Fade, ad nauseum.
If DA2 has this type of story mechanic at work I might as well kiss my life goodbye and devote it to DA2.
Despite what DAO advertised, it was never a 80 game. I played on Nightmare my first time, did every sidequest, talked to every single NPC, read everything in the codex and I clocked at about 48 hours. But all the same, I expect DA2 to not be more than 70 at the very very most.
joriandrake wrote...
link?javierabegazo wrote...
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
I just came.
lol, these forums would not be complete without you dear
So is this actually going to be "simplified and abstract" or "very detailed, just stylized"? Because that kind of makes it sound they want to have very much the opposites somehow simultaneously.Sauronych wrote...
More info:
3) Matt Goldman, the art director, lists two major inspirations for the new art style.
(a more simplified and abstract background to concentrate viewer/player's attention on the characters and important details)
Matt also made a remark that this doesn't mean the whole game will have simple environments like the desert we have seen. Everything is still very detailed, just more stylized.
Modifié par tmp7704, 21 juillet 2010 - 05:31 .
tmp7704 wrote...
So is this actually going to be "simplified and abstract" or "very detailed, just stylized"? Because that kind of makes it sound they want to have very much the opposites somehow simultaneously.
Retour en haut
